Concerns Rise as States Opt In to National Voucher Plan

The battle for K-12 education funding is on: 27 states sign onto Trump’s national school voucher program (ECCA), igniting concerns from public school advocates over underfunding and school closures.

Will Trump and the GOP Lose Gun Rights Votes in the Midterms?

The president’s comments after the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti are the latest reason.

DHS shutdown becomes Democrats’ leverage to curb ICE tactics after Minnesota deaths

Following two Minnesota deaths, Democrats leverage DHS funding to push ICE limits, raising questions about their influence in a GOP-controlled Congress.

Data and decisions: AI is changing how the military operates

Artificial intelligence is transforming how the Department of Defense operates while raising new questions about oversight, reliability and reliance on private tech firms.

‘Intentional Chaos’: Ankle Monitors Surge in ICE Supervision Program

Use of ankle monitors in immigration enforcement has spiked following a June 2025 internal ICE memo encouraging their use in the Alternatives to Detention program, raising concerns about transparency and the toll on immigrants.

Latest in Politics

DHS shutdown becomes Democrats’ leverage to curb ICE tactics after Minnesota deaths

WASHINGTON – For more than a month, Democrats have refused to fund the Department of Homeland Security while demanding that the agency limit Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in ten specific ways after federal agents killed two people during federal immigration operations in Minnesota in January.

“We will not continue to allow what we’re seeing on the streets. Thousands of Americans, of immigrants, of our neighbors from Chicago to Minneapolis are saying ‘enough is enough,’” said Rep. Delia Ramirez, D-Ill. 

Democrats’ push for immigration enforcement reform has fueled a funding standoff on Capitol Hill that triggered a partial shutdown of DHS in mid-February after lawmakers failed to reach a funding agreement. The shutdown followed their dispute over the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown, including the January deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis.

Amid the backlash, President Donald Trump announced the withdrawal of 700 federal agents from Minnesota and sent border czar Tom Homan to lead immigration enforcement, who later announced the wind down of the operation, but also stressed support for Trump’s goal of widespread deportation of undocumented immigrants.

“We are not surrendering the President’s mission on a mass deportation operation. If you are in the country illegally, if we find you, we’ll deport you,” Homan said at a press conference in Minneapolis last month.

On Capitol Hill, the budget standoff raised a broader question about whether Democrats can realistically use the DHS funding fight to force changes to federal immigration enforcement while Republicans control Congress.

Democratic leaders have made 10 demands in the DHS funding bill to restrict ICE officers’ aggressive tactics as a condition for funding Homeland Security. The demands include removing face coverings, identifying themselves during operations, and less aggressive force standards. 

“They have the leverage to withhold the funding, so the issue is what do you do with it?” Georgetown Law School supervising attorney Sophia Genovese told Medill News Service.

Genovese pointed to the shutdown in the fall when Republicans entered the negotiations expecting Democrats to eventually concede, and Democrats ultimately agreed to a deal without securing the policy changes they had demanded.

She said her concern is that if Republicans hold out long enough again, public attention could fade and Democrats could face similar pressure to fold.

“The public strongly supports this. This is an issue that’s going to keep coming up,” Genovese said. “But the fear is if they’re going to capitulate and fold and continue to allow this crisis to occur again.” 

In recent months, Democrats have also introduced a series of bills to advance their push for ICE accountability. 

At a news conference in February, Senator Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., and Reps. Andrea Salinas, D-Ore. and Derek Tran, D-Calif., introduced the “ICE and CBP Constitutional Accountability Act”, which would allow individuals to seek civil damages if U.S. Customs and Border Protection or ICE officers violate their rights.

Rep. Salinas criticized Trump’s 2025 budget bill that awarded more than $170 billion towards border and interior enforcement, and said the legislation would check ICE and CBP by targeting funds from the 2025 budget bill and using those funds to compensate victims.

“Without accountability, there are no consequences. And without consequences, they will keep violating the Constitution,” Salinas said.

That same month, Rep. Ramirez introduced the “Melt ICE Act”, a bill that would end funding for immigration detention and enforcement under DHS and redirect the money to community services. She said continued funding for DHS fuels human suffering and called for abolishing ICE.

“It must be dismantled piece by piece and we need something new, a system that actually honors our rights, a system based on dignity, humanity,” Ramirez said.

Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., said he hopes Democrats can secure significant reforms to how ICE operates, but he is skeptical that Trump will support meaningful change and would instead veto the bills.

“He’s had a very bad policy. He’s the person who appointed Noem during the rampage in Minneapolis, and he’s really politicized the whole issue so I don’t think he has confidence in reasonable reform,” Welch told Medill News Service. “ICE should be subject to all of the same standards in training, engagement, and warrants that apply to police enforcement in every community across the country.”

Genovese said the proposed legislation falls into several categories, including bills aimed at shrinking the immigration enforcement system and reducing deportations, measures that seek to reform agents’ conduct without limiting enforcement, and others she said would have little practical impact.

“Are all of these bills feeding into an overall reduction of the Department of Homeland Security’s enforcement apparatus, or are these pieces of legislation just simple appeasements for the public? And so that’s something the Democrats need to think critically about,” Genovese said.

Genovese argued that even some Republicans are beginning to recognize the need for limits on immigration enforcement.

“They are disappointed with the immigration enforcement actions they are seeing,” Genovese said. “Even if not every single bill passes, I think Democrats have a tremendous opportunity to get some of these bills passed.”

Indeed, in March, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem faced two days of sharp questioning from Republicans and Democrats on the House and Senate Judiciary Committees over her leadership and the administration’s immigration crackdown. 

“What we’ve seen is innocent people getting detained that turn out are American citizens,” Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said heatedly to Noem. “We’re beginning to get the American people to think that deporting people is wrong. It’s the exact opposite. The way you’re going about deporting them is wrong.”

Soon after the hearing, Trump fired Noem as homeland security secretary and nominated Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., as her replacement.

Rep. Ramirez told Medill News Service that both parties must ask whether they are standing up for their constituents, the rule of law, and the Constitution, and to take action without making excuses or delaying the work.

“Are they going to continue to make excuses and not have a spine and allow Donald Trump to continue to terrorize their communities? So I think it’s really important that right now, we’re building the case to be able to actually ‘melt ICE’,” Ramirez said.


Published in conjunction with The Fulcrum Logo

Why potential leaders are walking away from state legislatures

WASHINGTON — When Michigan state Rep. Laurie Pohutsky, D-Mich., filed her reelection paperwork this January, she wasn’t just considering policy goals. She was weighing her safety. For her, the decision to run for reelection was a calculated risk, one made easier only because the threats on her life had slowed. 

“I hadn’t had a really bad death threat in a while,” she said.

Like many public figures, Pohutsky has received several death threats throughout her seven years in office.

“At one point, I had the address for someone who had sent my office a death threat via email, and they said that all of the legislators – and this was during COVID – all of us should be shot and killed,” she said. “And I flagged that for law enforcement, and they said it wasn’t specific enough.”

As the 2026 midterms approach, and less than a year after a state legislator was killed in Minnesota, security and financial concerns trouble would-be contenders for state legislative offices. 

State deadlines to declare candidacy vary, so it will not be clear until July whether nerves over security risks or financial concerns have increased the number of uncontested races. Since 2016, 30% to 50% of state legislative candidates have had no opponent from the other major party. In 2024 alone, of the 5,087 seats up for election, ​​2,224 were uncontested.


Trading safety for service

While elected officials willingly chose to sacrifice their time and energy during legislative sessions, most did not realize they would also be sacrificing their sense of safety, both for themselves and for their families.

On June 14, 2025, Minnesota Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, were killed in their home in a targeted attack, which sent shockwaves through statehouses nationwide. The suspect, Vance Boelter, was indicted for their murders, as well as the shootings of state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette Hoffman.

State Rep. Erin Koegel, D-Minn., who was a friend and colleague of Hortman, not only endured her grief but also worried for her own safety, as she learned that she was on Boelter’s hit list of Democratic Minnesota lawmakers.

“I was, as far as distance from Melissa’s house, my house was probably the next closest,” Koegel said.

After the assassination, Koegel decided to stay at her mom’s house over that weekend. When she came back to her house that Monday, someone started sending pizzas to her doorstep.

“They ordered pizzas to my house the second I got home,” Koegel said. “They knew when I was home, and it was, like, hey, we know where you live, and we know that you’re there right now, and that totally freaked me out.” 

She called the police.  

These safety concerns often go beyond the state level, with many members of the U.S. Congress echoing those sentiments.

When former U.S. Rep. Debbie Muscarcel-Powell, D-Fla., served in office from 2019 to 2021, she and her colleagues in Washington were in a constant state of worry. 

“I’ve had conversations with members of Congress that have told me: I did not sign up to serve, to then be threatened; for my life to be threatened, or my family’s to be threatened,” she said.

In a 2023 survey, the Brennan Center for Justice found that more than 40% of state legislators in their study experienced threats of political violence, with 29% reporting that the seriousness of the incidents had only increased.

Incidents of politically targeted violence impose a significant emotional and physical toll on public officials and distract them from their responsibilities in serving their communities. 


Priced out of representation

The financial strain that accompanies state office further discourages candidates for budding legislators and the barriers to retention for lawmakers. 

According to the National Conference of State Legislators, the average annual salary for a state legislator in 2025 was $44,320. The lowest annual salary for New Hampshire state legislators is $100. While many states have part-time legislatures, some have full-time positions, with higher salaries. For example, in Michigan, the salary for full-time legislators starts slightly over $71,000.

Vermont state Rep. Mary-Katherine Stone, D-Vt., a legislator vocal about the financial struggles she faces as a working mother, has found the pay to be unsustainable in the long run. 

“I’m most likely not going to be able to continue to serve just because now I have another mouth to feed,” Stone said. “I have a little one, and it’s just a lot to only make, you know, $15,000 a year, and it’s a part-time legislative job, but you’re really working full-time for half a year.”

For legislators with children, low legislative pay is only one of their biggest concerns when serving in office and trying to support their families, as many struggle with the logistics of child care and the demands of their busy schedules.

“Right now, I don’t have daycare for my child. My husband is on parental leave from the Air Force for 12 weeks. So he was able to start his parental leave at the start of the session, but come the end of this month, I have no idea what I’m gonna do,” Stone said. “I’ve just been bringing the baby into work every day, but I’m gonna have to do that solo April through May.”

For many legislators with lower salaries, full-time jobs alongside their part-time legislative roles help keep them afloat. 

Matthew Foster, a government professor at American University, sees a silver lining in lawmakers handling full-time jobs outside their state offices. 

“You want your representatives to look beyond their own self-interest in their pocketbook,” Foster said. 

However, these financial barriers can also reduce the number of qualified candidates willing to run for little financial benefit. 

“Those that don’t have resources are kind of priced out, because they can’t get a salary to live off of,” Foster said. “It perpetuates the reality that those who get into politics tend to be more privileged economically.”


The growing recruitment gap

According to Foster, another cause of the lack of competition at the state level is the failure of the Democratic and Republican party committees to recruit qualified candidates.

“The first place you should point a finger at is the state party for not trying to do that recruitment,” Foster said. 

Organizations such as the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee and the Republican State Leadership Committee typically recruit candidates ahead of campaign seasons. 

“I think a lot of parties focus too much on the actual election, the advertising, the money and the campaigning, and not enough prep for the groundwork of cultivating this talent,” Foster said.

Legislators in office often bear recruitment responsibilities as well, especially when seeking young candidates to replace them when they retire.

“I tried to recruit somebody from our local school board,” said Koegel, who is not running for reelection. The candidate she attempted to recruit was a woman of color with experience in office. 

“And she was doubting herself, and she decided not to run,” Koegel added.

For Rep. Pohutsky, the stakes of fewer diverse candidates running are clear.

“If we are only represented by people who are independently wealthy or are retired,” then “it’s gonna result in bad policy,” she said.


Published in conjunction with TIMES UNION Logo

Latest in Education

Repubs and Dems clash over parental opt-out rights in education after Supreme Court ruling involving LGBTQ+ books

Seven months after a Supreme Court Case gave parents sweeping rights to remove their children from lessons that violate religious beliefs, Republicans conveyed concerns Tuesday about school districts ignoring the ruling while Democrats voiced fears that the ruling condoned discrimination. 

“In a world where new and controversial types of content are finding their way into classrooms, it is essential that parents maintain control over their child’s education,” Rep. Kevin Kiley, R-Calif., said in a congressional hearing of a subcommittee he chairs.

​In Mahmoud v. Taylor, the Court ruled Maryland parents had a First Amendment right to opt their children out of public school lessons involving LGBTQ+ themed storybooks that conflict with their religion. Tuesday’s hearing provided a venue for congressional Republicans and Democrats to reflect on how the ruling has changed classrooms.

Democrats voiced worries about the dangerous precedent it sets for censorship and exclusion.

​”Inclusion is not indoctrination,” the committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Suzanne Bonamici, D-Ore. said. “Differences exist in the world around us and part of a good education includes teaching students about tolerance and understanding.” 

Bonamici said Republicans are using parental rights as another means to undermine public education.

Assistant Professor of Law at Yeshiva University, Zalman Rothschild, said he fears the decision could have broad implications and could be disruptive for education.

​“I have no idea how in any sense this can be bounded,” Rothschild said. “For example, say a teacher tries to teach the value of nondiscrimination against religion and specifies its wrong to discriminate against Jews, or against Muslims and some parents have a problem with that because of their sincerely held religious beliefs, because Chapter 16 of Mark says that those who are not baptized are condemned.”

Adelita Grijalva, D-Ariz., urged her Republican colleagues not take the ruling as permission to turn public schools into the “latest front in a culture war.”​

Grijalva said Republicans were hypocritical to encourage federal involvement in education when they call themselves “the party that wants things to go back to the local level.”​

“I want us to continue to support our duly locally elected school districts to make decisions about school curriculum,” Grijalva said.

Rep. Summer Lee, D-Pa., held up a children’s picture book from the Montgomery curriculum, “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding,” while she questioned witnesses. The story follows a young girl as she learns that her favorite uncle is getting married to his partner, Jamie. 

Lee said providing holistic education to American children became harder after the ruling. 

“It’s about exploiting religious exemptions to shield children from the reality of queer people existing,”  

Conservative education groups, however, applauded the power shift in schools after the ruling.

“Two of the story books, not only “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding” but “Pride Puppy!”, addressed non-binary individuals, drag queens and pride parades. These are individuals who don’t have a clear sense of their identity regarding whether they want to be a firefighter or a fairy when they grow up. What we’re dealing with is a designed attempt to change minds on perspectives,” said Sarah Perry, vice president of Defending Education, a national advocacy group calling for more parental involvement in schools.  

Throughout the hearing, Bonamici tried to steer the conversation to “hearing topics that actually matter,” including ICE inflicting trauma in schools and the effects of the dismantling of the Department of Education. She pointed out that the committee had yet to hold a hearing on gun violence in schools and that just yesterday, a 16-year-old was shot at a Montgomery County Public School. 

“No one is arguing that parents should not be involved in their children’s education. We all agree on that,” Bonamici said. “Banning books or preventing students from learning about differences only serves to perpetuate a culture of hatred and fear.”


Published in conjunction with UPI Logo

House conflicted over One Big Beautiful Bill Act changes to federal student loans and solution to rising college costs

WASHINGTON — In a debate over how to best address rising college tuition, the Higher Education and Workforce Development Subcommittee discussed the consequences of recent changes to federal student loan policy on American families.  ​

At Wednesday’s hearing, Republicans blamed administrative bloat for the college affordability crisis. Democrats pointed to a lack of state and federal investment in higher education, unchecked privatization and for-profit colleges.

Average tuition for both public and private four-year colleges has essentially doubled over the last 30 years, after adjusting for inflation, according to CollegeBoard. Both parties emphasized the importance of higher education for a strong American workforce and economy.  

“We all agree there is a college affordability crisis in this country,” said Alma Adams, D-N.C., the subcommittee’s top Democrat. “Where we disagree is on the solution.”

Republicans praised their work to change federal loan policy in H.R. 1, now commonly referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act or The Working Families Act. The law imposes new borrowing caps, restructures the repayment system, reduces Pell Grant eligibility and reduces safety nets.

“The Working Families Tax Cuts simplified student loan repayment plans from over 50 options down to just two: a fixed ‘mortgage’ style plan and a ‘repayment assistance plan’ that provides targeted relief to borrowers in need,” committee Chairman Burgess Owens, R-Utah, said.

Owens said that the law will also hold schools accountable for student outcomes and ensure that their degrees improve their financial prospects. He said he is confident that restoring market incentives in higher education will lead to better pricing for students.

“The title of this hearing really should be about working families getting run over by the One Big Beautiful Bill,” Joe Courtney, D-Conn., said. “Again, I know they’re trying to rebrand the H.R. 1 to a different title, but the fact of the matter is, most people in this country have sort of figured out what a scam it is.”

Witness Julie Margetta Morgan is president of The Century Foundation and previously worked in the U.S. Department of Education. She said that the bill leaves students with two options: not attending college because it is too expensive or taking on risky private loans.

“These loans are going to have a higher interest rate, and they are going to have fewer options for people when they get in trouble on paying their loan,” Morgan said. “They don’t have the forgiveness option, they don’t have the income-based repayment options.”  

Columbia economics and education Professor Judith Scott-Clayton said, in general, federal student loans have been a safe option for students because they offer many protections, including income-based repayment options, interest rate subsidies and very low default rates.

“All that being said, I think we’re definitely at a moment right now where there is so much chaos going on in the student loan repayment world,” Scott-Clayton said.

Scott-Clayton said families’ hesitation and anxiety about taking on student debt are not unreasonable at this time.

She said universities are feeling pressured because they can’t necessarily count on a guaranteed supply of families willing to pay what they charge every year, especially since the education sector is under fire and students are very price-sensitive.  

​Wellesley College Economics Professor Phillip Levine created MyinTution, which gives families access to a projected cost of attendance once financial aid is factored in, called the net price.

“It relies on very basic financial characteristics, how much money did you make last year, a few basic asset categories, what do you have in the stock market, that sort of thing,” Levine said. “It is very valuable for the institution to make it possible for prospective students to get off of the sticker price.” 

Bob Onder, R-Mo., emphasized bipartisan legislation to improve college price transparency. His Student Financial Clarity Act creates a universal net price calculator and expands the college scorecard for students to compare costs across institutions. 

Evan Bertis-Sample is a Northwestern University student from a low-income family. He receives the maximum financial aid package from Northwestern and also takes out a subsidized federal student loan each quarter to cover housing costs.

“I’m a first-generation student, so no one in my family before me has really had to deal with this type of stuff,” Bertis-Sample said. “So I had no advice given to me, so navigating what student loans look like, what financial aid packages are, and how to interpret them was definitely a big struggle.”

The committee has approved the Student Financial Clarity Act, and Onder said he is hopeful the bill will be brought to the House floor soon.

Health & Science

Medical schools commit to increased nutrition education at RFK Jr.’s request

WASHINGTON – Fifty three medical schools will dedicate at least 40 hours of students’ degree requirements to nutrition education beginning next fall, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. announced on Thursday. 

In a survey of 133 U.S. medical schools, a 2015 study from the Journal of Biomedical Education found that medical students typically receive about 19 hours of nutrition education across the four years of their education.

The schools’ commitment to the initiative, which was developed with the Department of Education, marks the latest advancement of Kennedy’s “Make America Healthy Again” agenda. He said it is one of his “proudest days” at the Department of Health and Human Services. 

“Today represents a mutual recognition that HHS and leaders in American medicine can come together to advance shared goals and interests,” Kennedy said. 

In an August 2025 op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, Kennedy said he believes poor nutrition is the root of the “chronic-disease epidemic” and called on medical education organizations to include “rigorous” nutrition education in medical training.

Kennedy also said HHS will provide $5 million through a National Institutes of Health “nutrition education challenge” to support curriculum development and clinical training. The program will extend to medical schools as well as nursing residency, nutrition science and dietitian programs. 

Secretary of Education Linda McMahon echoed Kennedy’s statement that the initiative does not mean the Trump administration dictates what medical schools teach and said her department will “never mandate curriculum.” 

“That’s not our job,” McMahon said. 

American Medical Association President Bobby Mukkamala, who spoke at the event, told Medill News Service that he thinks the push for more nutrition education will spread “contagiously, in a good way.” 

“When I talk to people involved in medical education… it’s a no-brainer,” Mukkamala said. “It’s wonderful to be that aligned on something where (for) everybody now, this should be more on their compass than it is.” 

According to the New York Times, Kennedy worked for months to secure partnerships from schools across the country and at times threatened funding eligibility if schools did not teach enough about nutrition. 

Schools involved were listed on the HHS website as a “committed partner,” including Tulane University School of Medicine, University of Texas Houston McGovern Medical School and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth. 

Kennedy encouraged participation from schools that did not join the initiative. 

“If your school is not on today’s list, that does not mean the door’s closed,” Kennedy said. “We expect you to step forward.” 

Senators question surgeon general nominee Casey Means on vaccine and autism beliefs

WASHINGTON – Surgeon general nominee Casey Means said at a confirmation hearing Wednesday she believes “vaccines save lives” but stopped short of saying she would encourage Americans to receive specific vaccines.

“I do believe that each patient, mother or parent needs to have a conversation with their pediatrician about any medication they’re putting in their body or their children’s bodies,” Means said.   

As a leader of the “Make America Healthy Again” movement, Means, if confirmed, would join Human and Health Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s administration, which has sowed skepticism about vaccines and changed the recommended U.S. childhood vaccine schedule. 

Means, if confirmed to be surgeon general, would be responsible for providing Americans with scientific information on improving their health and decreasing the risk of illness and injury. The role also includes overseeing over 6,000 officers in the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, according to the HHS website. 

Means is a wellness influencer, author and entrepreneur. She graduated from the Stanford School of Medicine but did not complete her residency. Means has an inactive medical license in Oregon, according to the Washington Post.

In his introduction of Means, Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., said she did not complete her residency because she was “disillusioned” by what she saw as the focus on treating symptoms rather than addressing underlying causes of health issues. 

“As a physician, I have always been inspired that the root of the word ‘healing’ means ‘to return to wholeness,’” Means said in her opening remarks. “Nothing is more urgent than restoring wholeness for Americans physically, mentally and societally.” 

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., the committee chair, probed Means on how she would communicate health advice to Americans. 

Cassidy asked if she believes people should have an in-person visit with a doctor before receiving a mifepristone prescription. 

Means repeatedly said she would encourage Americans to have thorough discussions with their doctor to understand risks and benefits that may come with birth control or other medications, but she did not commit to saying those discussions should be in-person. She also said she “absolutely” thinks oral contraception should be “widely accessible.” 

Republicans have previously shown interest in requiring in-person consultations for mifepristone prescriptions and are generally against mail-order abortion drugs. 

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., agreed with Means on the dangers of processed food but pressed her to clarify her position on vaccines.

“I think the answers you gave us were a little bit political and not to the point,” Sanders said.

On autism, Means said she believes it’s important to continue to study causes of rising rates of the condition but said she is “not here to complicate the issue” of vaccines. 

“We have a situation where autism is rising. This is a huge problem,” Means said to Sanders. “As a biomedical researcher and physician, I am not going to sit here and say that we should not study something in the future.” 

President Donald Trump nominated Means for surgeon general in May 2025, stating in a Truth Social post at the time that she has “impeccable ‘MAHA’ credentials” and would work closely with RFK Jr. 

Her confirmation hearing was originally scheduled for last October but was postponed after she delivered a baby, according to Reuters

Means’s brother, Calley Means, is a senior adviser in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and sat in the audience during the hearing. 

The committee is expected to vote on whether to send her nomination to the full Senate for a confirmation vote. 

Latest in Environment

Potomac sewer spill remains ‘active incident’ one month later

WASHINGTON — Exactly one month after a major sewer line collapsed, pouring raw sewage into the Potomac River, environmental advocates and experts warned the public health threat could continue for months.

The initial spill occurred on Jan. 19 when a section of the Potomac Interceptor, a regional sewer system, collapsed along the Clara Barton Parkway in Montgomery County, Md. According to DC Water, which operates and manages the sewer system, approximately 243 million gallons of wastewater have overflowed from the collapse site. 

Since the collapse, government and independent researchers have monitored the quality of the water around the rupture, specifically testing for E. coli. This bacterium indicates sewage contamination, which could cause vomiting and diarrhea for anyone who comes into contact with the water. Experts say water conditions can change day by day, making consistent monitoring critical.

Despite a temporary remedy, the effects of the enormous spill will likely be prolonged because of the limitations of the fix and the weather conditions. That creates uncertainty, inconvenience and possible health risks for the many people who enjoy recreation by the river. 

Betsy Nicholas, the president of the Potomac Riverkeeper Network, a local environmental advocacy group, said the weather conditions immediately following the spill could prolong its impact. 

“The entire Potomac was completely frozen just a few days after this spill started,” Nicholas said. “So all of that [sewage] was contained in the ice, and the river is going to thaw more slowly than we’d see on our streets.”

As the ice melts gradually, she said, contaminants trapped beneath the surface could continue affecting water quality for weeks or even months.

“I can’t imagine going through the warm months into the summer without being able to get in and kayak and swim and all of those things in the Potomac,” Nicholas said. “Hopefully, we will get enough information to do that and stay safe.” 

The Potomac Riverkeeper Network’s latest findings suggested people should avoid areas closest to the rupture site, particularly around Lock 10 and the adjacent C&O Canal, where contaminated water has reached the banks. Walking along the waterfront in places such as Georgetown or National Harbor was considered low risk, Nicholas said, but kayaking, rowing or other activities that involve direct contact with the water should be avoided for now. 

DC Water Chief Engineer Moussa Wone said permanent repairs of the pipe would take up to nine months. A temporary bypass structure was installed to reroute wastewater back into the sewer system. 

“There’s also the potential, until it’s fully repaired, that we’re going to have small overflows there,” Nicholas said. “Ultimately, we would like to see daily monitoring and posting of the results so that we can make sure that everyone stays safe.”

Hedrick Belin, President of the Potomac Conservancy, an environmental non-profit organization, called the spill “an active incident.” He said public access to up-to-date water quality data is critical to protecting public health and safety.

“Until [the] 40 to 60 million gallons of sewage that’s flowing every day is back in a pipe, fully contained, risks to public health, to the environment, to recreation continue,” Belin said. 

DC Water is conducting daily water quality tests and posting the results online, while the Potomac Riverkeeper Network is working with the University of Maryland to publish weekly updates on Instagram. Nicholas said it’s essential to have multiple independent sources sharing and verifying data. 

Nicholas and Belin both said that they believe local and federal governments have not adequately warned the public. Washington did not issue an advisory urging people and pets to avoid the river until Feb. 12, nearly a month after the spill began.

“People should be calling for stronger leadership at the local, state, and federal level about this ongoing incident, demanding more accountability, more communication, more information, and ultimately urgency to get this crisis under control,” Belin said.

Latest in National Security

Senators discuss new legislation on foreign financial gifts to American universities, amid national security concerns

WASHINGTON — In a debate over the exploitation of American universities by foreign governments, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions examined what lawmakers described as a “critical national security vulnerability” at Thursday’s hearing.

Republicans argued that foreign governments, particularly China, are giving money to American universities to gain access to sensitive research, intellectual property and political influence on campuses. Democrats warned that while transparency and oversight are necessary, overly restrictive policies could undermine international academic collaboration and exaggerate the scale of the threat. 

“We cannot be naive. There are times when the money serves allegedly as cover to infiltrate universities to steal research and talent and to foment anti-American ideology,” said Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., the committee’s chairman. “This is a national security concern and requires federal legislation.” 

Senators discussed potential ways to increase transparency and oversight of universities’ reporting of foreign gifts and contracts. 

Sen. Andy Kim, D-N.J., questioned witnesses on whether Congress should fully cut off academic ties with Chinese institutions and researchers.

“I don’t think you have to throw the baby out with the bath water, but I do think much more stringent restrictions need to be enacted here,” said Craig Singleton, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. 

However, Kim warned that completely cutting off ties with Chinese universities could have negative effects on research and academia. He worried about the “presumption of concern upon people of Asian descent, people of descent of other countries that we are raising suspicion about.”

“The Asian American community has raised significant concerns about this,” he said. “I just want us to be knowledgeable about these broader knock-on effects that can cascade and very much affect not just the health of our universities and our research partnerships but also…the signal that it sends to the diversity of different communities in America.” 

Republican senators countered that the scale of foreign funding demands strong action. 

“Foreign government influence in our universities is gaining traction through these large, obscene gifts or grants,” Sen. Ashley Moody, R-Fla., said.

Federal data shows that China has contributed roughly $6.8 billion in gifts and contracts to American universities over time. Universities also reported about $400 million in transactions involving entities on U.S. government watchlists or restricted entity lists that pose threats to national security, foreign policy interests or public safety.

Peter Wood, president of the National Association of Scholars, pointed out that incomplete reporting by universities has made it difficult for lawmakers and the public to fully understand the scale and purpose of foreign funding. 

At the center of the legislative debate was the proposed Defending Education Transparency and Ending Rogue Regimes Engaging in Nefarious Transactions (DETERRENT) Act, which would require universities to report foreign gifts greater than $50,000. It would change Section 117 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, which already requires universities to report gifts above $250,000 to the Department of Education. 

Senator Patty Murray, D-Wash., said she worried about adding more responsibilities to a “dismantled” Department of Education by changing the reporting system. 

“I’m pretty troubled that we’re having this hearing today to add even more responsibilities to the Department of Education when we still in this committee have not had Secretary (Linda) McMahon before us to answer some really serious questions about what she is doing right now which is an illegal scheme to dismantle the Department of Education,” said Murray. 

She also expressed concern over the new shared oversight of foreign gifts and contracts between the Department of Education and the Department of State. It’s “part of its broader effort to dismantle the Department of Education,” and that it would make compliance more complicated for universities. 

Cassidy closed the hearing by thanking President Donald Trump for his action on the issue and said passing the DETERRENT Act is the next step to close loopholes and increase transparency to Congress, intelligence agencies and the public, thereby increasing accountability.  

DETERRENT was received in the Senate, read twice, and referred to the committee in late March. There is no vote scheduled on the bill as of yet.

Republicans want to see Iran’s nuclear program destroyed. Democrats are asking if an end to the war is in sight.

WASHINGTON — Congressional Democrats Tuesday demanded clarity on an exit strategy for the Iran war. Republicans said their focus remains on what the military campaign would ultimately accomplish.

On Feb. 28, the U.S and Israel initiated strikes against Iran, killing the country’s Supreme Leader Ayotollah Ali Khamenei. On Monday, President Donald Trump held a press conference for the first time since the war began, pushing back against criticisms of the operation and suggesting the campaign was nearing an end.

“We’re achieving major strides toward completing our military objective. And some people could say they’re pretty well complete,” he said from his golf resort in Doral, Fla. “We’ve wiped every single force in Iran out, very completely. Most of Iran’s naval powers have been sunk.”

The following day, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth showed no indication that strikes against Iran would slow down. He told reporters at the Pentagon the U.S. was ramping up to make Tuesday the “most intense day” of American strikes against Iran since the start of the war. The Senate Armed Services Committee received a closed briefing on the Iranian military action Tuesday morning.

Amid mixed messaging from the Trump administration, Democrats are questioning the reasoning and timeline for the war, although many Republicans expressed support for Trump’s decision to engage. 

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said after leaving the briefing that she remains concerned the Trump administration has not explained why it entered the war without congressional approval, the military strategy behind the operation or its broader goals in the region.

“I’m very worried about how long this will drag on. We are hearing no logistical estimates about when it will be over,” Warren said. “This is not a war that’s supported by this country, and this is not a war that makes us safer.”

Republican lawmakers seemed less concerned about when the operation would end and expressed approval for the war. Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., said he has never been more impressed with a military operation than he is with Epic Fury, and argued the strikes were necessary because of Iran’s capability to develop nuclear weapons. 

“We did this in the nick of time,” he said. “Thank god President Trump acted.” 

In a video released on social media the morning after the U.S. and Israel struck Iran in February, Trump said the country had continued to develop nuclear missiles that could “soon reach the American homeland.” He said the threat persisted after the United States first initiated strikes against three nuclear sites in June 2025. 

A 2025 Defense Intelligence Agency assessment contradicted these claims, reporting that Iran is years away from the ability to produce long-range missiles. 

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., expressed little concern about the length of the war, describing the conflict as a “short-term phenomenon.” He said he expects the United States to leave the region soon.

Graham argued the timeline of the war matters less than its outcome.

“It’s not when it ends, it’s how it ends,” Graham said. “There’s no way you can say you won this war with an Ayatollah in charge.”

He said that a sustainable victory would require Iran’s future leaders to abandon the pursuit of nuclear weapons, which he believes could open the door to peace in the region.

Democrats, meanwhile, questioned Trump’s decision to launch strikes without congressional authorization. Senator Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M, said the president should have sought approval from Congress before initiating military action.

“When it comes to reducing costs in America, everything should be on the table,” Luján said. 

“Make no mistake: When President Trump decided to go to war in Iran on his own and refused to ask his Republican colleagues in the House and the Senate to give him authorization for use of force, he really doesn’t care.”

Some Republicans have indicated they would support funding the war effort if additional resources are needed. Kennedy said lawmakers have not yet been asked to approve additional funding.

Democrats say they will put up a fight if asked to financially support the war. Warren said she’d be a “hard no” if asked to approve supplemental funding to continue the military campaign.

“The one thing Congress has the power to do is to stop actions like this through the power of the purse,” she said. “The military already has $1 trillion.”

Latest in Living

Amid anti-ICE protests, peace-marching Buddhist monks deliver a non-controversial message to thousands in DC

WASHINGTON — Tears welled in Cynthia Flanders’ eyes Wednesday as she reflected on a group of Buddhist monks’ walk to promote peace. Wearing a beanie that read “it’s okay not to be okay,” Flanders traveled from her Michigan hometown to the Washington region solely for this experience.

“When I heard that they were marching to remind us of the peace that each one of us has, every time I say that, it brings tears to my eyes because I’m so touched by that reminder, you know?” Flanders said. “I’m here to get back in touch with a warm, soft, less brutal heart, and remember we’re all connected.”

The monks’ 4-month, 2,300-mile walk journey to DC came at a time when anti-ICE protests have popped up around the country, but the monks avoided political comments about ICE or anything else, Brandon Dotson, a Georgetown University professor of Buddhist studies, said in an interview with the Medill News Service. 

“I think we can interpret it in that context and say, ‘Well, this is an opportune time to talk about non-violence, to talk about peace, when we do have so many voices in our country that are promoting violence,” Dotson said. “But I don’t think that [the monks] are necessarily leading us to that conclusion.”

In fact, their public statements at a Lincoln Memorial ceremony on Wednesday afternoon did not advocate particular religious principles, but rather urged kindness and mindfulness practices.

“Love and kindness does not need power, money, or a title,” said Walk for Peace leader Bhikkhu Pannakara as he stood in front of the Lincoln Memorial. “It is simply the choice to stop before hurting, to sharpen before speaking, If each person takes just one second to ask, will this hurt anyone? The world would already be kinder.”

Dotson said this nonpolitical approach may protect them from potential criticism.

“For their sake, I hope that they’re not going to be too politicized, just because it is dangerous in our country, especially as an immigrant and as a foreigner, to be putting your head above the parapet,” Dotson said. “So I think what they’ve done has been very skillful.”

Regardless of what prompted them, Flanders said she was touched by the monks’ reminders of peace during this moment in politics that has frustrated her. 

“I’ve been really, quite filled with anguish about what is happening in our country and how people feel so divided,” Flanders said. “My heart has felt very brittle and in anger about things that I feel are unjust.”

Flanders and longtime friend Amy Moore have engaged in transcendental meditation, a practice that draws from Buddhist principles, since attending Iowa’s Maharishi International University 50 years ago. Moore, who lives in Utah, was compelled to travel across the country to support the monks. After meeting up in DC, the two friends spent three days walking alongside the monks. 

“I’ve been following the monks and I have been praying for peace forever,” Moore said, arm in arm with Flanders.

Moore was one of the first people to arrive at the monks’ first DMV appearance at Washington National Cathedral on Tuesday. She said that as she watched the crowd grow, a warm and joyful energy was “palpable.” 

After concluding their march in Maryland on Thursday, the marchers posted to Facebook: “Every welcome, every smile, every offering, every prayer, and every step you took with us brought us to this beautiful moment of completion today.”

In Photos: ‘Walk for Peace’ Buddhist monks complete Unity Walk on Embassy Row

WASHINGTON — On the 108th day of their walk across much of the U.S., a group of Buddhist monks arrived in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday for the final leg of their ‘Walk for Peace’. 

The monks, who began their pilgrimage in Fort Worth, Texas, described the walk as a spiritual journey promoting peace, compassion and unity.

After an interfaith ceremony at the Washington National Cathedral, the monks were joined by others for a Unity Walk down Embassy Row. 

D.C. police escorted the monks down the street with cars, motorcycles and police bikes. 

Monks smiled at babies who greeted them down the row. (Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)Many walkers handed out flowers to onlookers. (Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)Over a thousand people walked with and behind the monks. (Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)(Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)Many of the people on the sidewalk filmed the monks as they passed. (Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)(Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)(Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)(Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)(Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)Onlookers brought snacks and water for the monks and volunteers walking with them. (Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)

Latest Business

WATCH: Pop-ups become D.C.’s new path to storefronts

WASHINGTON — From a coffee cart inside the Cannon House Office Building to a pop-up inside a vintage clothing store, Washington entrepreneurs are rethinking how to start a business by turning to temporary setups instead of traditional storefronts.

With commercial vacancy rates nearing 23 percent and federal spending cuts reshaping the District’s economy, many small business owners are starting with pop-ups as a lower-risk path to building permanent storefronts. The pop-up model allows business owners to test ideas, build a community, and generate revenue without committing to costly long-term leases.

Black Crown Collective started as a simple coffee cart inside the Cannon House Office Building. Today, it operates as a permanent storefront serving customers on Capitol Hill, which is a model many entrepreneurs are now trying to replicate.

Watch the video report here:

Senators fault tax policy, Iran war spending for climbing national debt

WASHINGTON – Senators from both parties raised concern over both Iran war spending and how future generations will be impacted by the national debt in a Finance subcommittee hearing on Wednesday.

Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis., called out past Democratic and Republican administrations for increasing the rate of the climbing debt. He said he was not satisfied with tax cuts in Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill, calling the current deficit an “aberration” enabled from both sides of the aisle. 

“We still have not taken the first step in solving the problem, which is admit we have one,” Johnson said.

The Congressional Budget Office’s Feb. 11 report predicted that the budget deficit for the 2026 fiscal year would be $1.9 trillion with debt held by the public as 101% of GDP, which is about equal to the value of annual economic output. By 2036, the nonpartisan research office predicted the annual deficit to be $3.1 trillion with debt rising to 120% of GDP. 

These projections were based on the assumption that the government would not take legislative action to dramatically cut taxes or reduce spending. 

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) criticized how the Department of War’s spending in Iran is contributing to the national debt. In the first week of the war alone, the Pentagon spent more than $11.3 billion, according to the New York Times.

“It seems to me, that when we’re talking about money here, that the way we can save the most money would be to stop bombing Iran now,” she said. “Just as a side benefit, we could save a lot of lives.”

The rising deficit should cause significant concern to government leaders, considering the relative strength of the economy, Dr. Phillip Swagel, Congressional Budget Office director, said.  His office projects the unemployment rate will remain below 5% over the next 10 years, which signals a healthy economy.  

Ultimately, Swagel said today’s young generation will not be able to avoid making hard economic choices to sustain programs like Social Security, and may also face more difficult economic conditions. 

“Future generations will bear the burden of the deficit that will have to come in the future,” he said.

Meanwhile, the mounting national debt exacerbates the affordability crisis, according to Maya MacGuineas, the president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonprofit advocacy group.

She said the spiralling deficit raises inflation and costs, stifles economic opportunity and makes it harder to take out loans for mortgages and start-ups since interest rates remain high. 

The U.S. has been able to spend at such a rate despite its debt by relying on other countries, which have historically borrowed against the U.S. because it has the largest economy. However, in the future, when it becomes commonplace for other countries to borrow against each other rather than the U.S., national markets will collapse, predicted Martha Gimbel, executive director of Yale University’s Budget Lab. 

Gimbel compared the U.S. to a boyfriend at the beginning of a Hallmark movie, who only exists as a precursor to when the main character finds a better alternative. 

“The girlfriend is still going out with him even though she knows it is wrong,” Gimbel said. “But, at some point she’s going to go home to the small town and find the nice firefighter and realize that there is another option.”

SOTU: Health Care

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Congress should approve his plan to replace Obamacare with a new health care program that would provide “affordable alternative” insurance options and criticized Democrats for trying to impose “a socialist takeover of our health care system.”

“A good life for American families requires the most affordable, innovative and high-quality health care system on earth,” Trump said in his third State of the Union address.

Trump said he has proposed health care plans that would be up to 60% cheaper than the Affordable Care Act plans. Both the White House and the Department of Health and Human Services did not respond when asked if a specific replacement plan has existed or ever will.

The president blamed Democrats for not providing the American people with the health care reforms he has promised.

“As we work to improve Americans’ health care, there are those who want to take away your health care, take away your doctor, and abolish private insurance entirely,” said Trump, referring to the Democrats.

Democrats stood up at this comment, pointed their fingers at Trump and shouted “YOU.”

Trump said 130 Democrats endorse legislation to impose a “socialist takeover” of the health care system by “taking away the private health insurance plans of 180 million.”

Democratic presidential candidates Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., are pushing for a “Medicare for All” plan that would end private health insurance while other candidates like former Vice President Joe Biden, Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., are pushing to expand on Obamacare.

“We will never let socialism destroy American health care,” Trump said.

Trump emphasized the administration’s efforts to protect patients with pre-existing conditions, to which Democrats threw up their hands and shook their heads in disagreement. Led by House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate and House Democrats brought more than 80 patients, doctors and health care advocates from across the country as guests to the speech.

“President Trump will speak to an audience filled with Americans who are suffering because of his broken promises on prescription drug costs and his all-out assault on Americans with preexisting conditions,” Pelosi said in a press release Tuesday morning.

The president also called upon Congress to pass legislation to lower prescription drug prices.

“Get a bill to my desk, and I will sign it into law without delay,” the president said.

Democrats responded to this by booing and holding up three fingers to represent H.R. 3, legislation proposed by the late Rep. Elijah E. Cummings that would require the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to negotiate certain drug prices. The bill has been on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s desk for over a month after being passed in the House.

Generic prescription drug prices dropped 1% in 2018, the first price drop in 45 years, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. Trump said it was the first time in 51 years. Brand-name drug prices, however, are still increasing.

Trump said the administration will continue to make health care more transparent by requiring hospitals to make their prices negotiated with insurers public and easily accessible online. He also pointed to the passage of administration-backed legislation called “Right to Try,” which allows terminally ill patients access to drugs not fully approved by the Food and Drug Administration if they feel they have tried all other options.

He also said he has launched new initiatives to improve care for Americans with kidney disease, Alzheimer’s and those struggling with mental health challenges, in addition to pursuing new cures for childhood cancer and AIDS.

The House Ways and Means Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday afternoon to further discuss Trump’s health care policies and overcoming pharmaceutical barriers in particular.

Trump Sticks By Wall in State of the Union Address

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump’s call for a wall to secure America’s southern border in his State of the Union address Tuesday night was no surprise to opponents.

Jennifer Johnson, the policy director at the Southern Border Communities Coalition, said Trump continually characterizes the southern border as a violent area.

“More of a reality check, these are families and children seeking protection, fleeing spiraling violence and poverty,” she said.

Chris Montoya, who served as a Customs and Border Protection agent for 21 years, said that “crime rates are pretty low in border cities. Being a border patrol agent is one of the safest law enforcement jobs. All those things together means a safe border.”

Rep.  Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y., invited as his guest a mother who had been separated from her children at the border.

Other Democrats brought undocumented immigrants as their guests, including Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., Rep. Jimmy Gomez, D-Calif., and Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-N.J.

Rep. Sheila Jackson, D-Texas, was enthusiastic about their attendance at the address. “Their presence here today is representative of the big tent that America is,” she said.

In his address, Trump attributed what he called at crisis at the border to America’s “reduced jobs, lower wages, overburdened schools, and hospitals that are so crowded you can’t get in.” He referenced San Diego and El Paso as being cities that were once violent, and now safe with the addition of physical barriers.

Trump also mentioned the prevalence of MS-13 within the country. “They almost all come through our Southern border,” he said.

Montoya said MS-13 members do enter through the southern border on rare occasions, but it is uncommon for CBP agents to make an arrest.

Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin is the ranking member on the Senate Subcommittee for Border Security and Immigration. He said nothing changed in Trump’s rhetoric. “If we’re waiting on him, we’re not going to get this solved,” he said.

Washingtonians alternately protest, celebrate the State of the Union

WASHINGTON – DC-area residents had very different reactions to President Donald Trump’s second State of the Union address Tuesday night. But whether they celebrated or denounced the event, emotions were strong.

Around 40-50 people gathered at each of two intersections near the Capitol ahead of the address  — far fewer than the 400 people who protested last year, according to Resist DC, the community action group that organized both years’ protests.

People lined the sidewalks along the streets that President Donald Trump, Vice President Mike Pence and other Trump cabinet members’ motorcades were expected pass by. They held homemade signs lit with string lights so they would be visible to government officials in their cars and chanted anti-Trump messages to music and drums.

Eileen Minarick, 70, said she was protesting simply “because the state of our union is terrible.”

Members of Herndon-Reston Indivisible, a group created to resist President Trump's policies and elect Democrats to office, held lit-up letters spelling “Fraud” and “Yuge Liar.” (Ester Wells/MNS)40-50 protestors were stationed at each of two points along 3rd Street NW in Washington, D.C. (Ester Wells/MNS)Protestors waved Russian flags as they waited along the sidewalk. (Ester Wells/MNS)A protestor held a lit-up sign as he shouted the words. (Ester Wells/MNS)Eileen Minarick, 70, said, “I don’t feel I’m protesting Trump. I’m protesting the policies of his administration, which are inhuman.” (Ester Wells/MNS)(Ester Wells/MNS)Police cars and officers patrolled the streets surrounding the Capitol, many of which were blocked off to both vehicles and pedestrians. (Ester Wells/MNS)Patrons don pink stickers and resistance apparel as they listen to activist speakers and wait for President Trump's State of the Union address to begin  (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Sitting in front of the projector, a stray star is caught on actor Danny Glover's face as he prepares to educate attendees about the conflict in Latin America. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Co-founder of CODEPINK, Madea Benjamin addresses the crowd as other speakers converse with audience members. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)The classic pairing of wine and board games is at every table, except with a twist. In order to ‘survive the night’ patrons mark a square every time President Trump utters a common saying. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Violence against women must end, said Chad Smith, a trainer with nonprofit organization Men Can Stop Rape. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)All eyes are trained on the screen as Trump enters the House Chamber for the State of the Union address. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Grinning, a man in a Make America Great Again hat listens as President Donald Trump announced “I will get it built” in reference to a southern border wall at a local Young Republicans watch party. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)A sign welcomes members of the DC Young Republicans and Arlington Falls Church Young Republicans. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Members of Republican organizations gather around as President Trump continues past expected time in his State of the Union speech. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)The scene is more mellow downstairs, where a few recluse bar patrons chat with each other as the television screens broadcast in synchrony. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)

Elsewhere in the city, local bar patrons gathered to drink beer, compete in presidential bingo and watch the State of the Union.

Grassroots activist group CODEPINK hosted a number of guest speakers, including actor Danny Glover, for a lively discussion before the main event. Topics ranged from the Bolivarian revolution to ending domestic violence.

Anita Jenkins, spokeswoman for Stand Up for Democracy, riled the crowd with a call to establish the District of Columbia the 51st state in the United States.

“The people of D.C. have no representation… We have nobody to speak for us,” she said. Modifying the words of America’s early founders, she said, “Taxation without representation is a rip-off.”

As President Trump appeared on the projector, shouts of disapproval rose from the bar patrons. The State of the Union 2019 had begun and the energy was energetic in its moroseness.

Across town, the atmosphere was also charged. Members of DC Young Republicans and Arlington Falls Church Young Republicans filled a restaurant for a celebratory viewing party.

“In the past, most of the people in this room voted for a wall… but the proper wall never got built,” said Donald Trump. He paused and then said, “I’ll get it built.” Hoots and hollers erupted in the bar and two girls were seen smiling and hugging each other.

Though Trump stressed unity in his national address, DC-area residents remained divided in their reactions.

2020 Candidates Alternate Cheers, Hisses to Trump Wall, Immigration Proposals during State of Union

WASHINGTON – Several Democratic 2020 presidential candidates expressed their displeasure with many of President Donald Trump’s policies during the State of the Union address Tuesday.

Sens. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., could be seen shaking their heads when Trump mentioned controversial topics such as his commitment to building a border wall and the dangers of migrant caravans heading to the U.S. southern border.

Harris, who announced her candidacy on Jan. 21, shook her head and visibly mouthed, “They’re not,” as Trump said, “Large, organized caravans are on the march to the United States.”

In a Facebook Live address before the State of the Union, Harris told viewers, “It’s a moment for a president to rise above politics and unite the country with a vision that includes all Americans, not just the ones who may have voted for them. It’s a moment to bring us together.”

Early in the address, Harris was often reluctant to give Trump a standing ovation, asking her colleagues, “Really?” as they cheered the president’s comments about space exploration.

The candidates and their Democratic colleagues booed and hissed as Trump labeled the numerous investigations into his campaign finance and relationship with Russia “ridiculous partisan investigations.”

“If there is going to be peace and legislation, there cannot be war and investigation,” he said. “It just doesn’t work that way!”

Democrats cheered later as Trump mentioned that women have filled 58 percent of new jobs in the past year. New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who has formed a presidential exploratory committee, pointed at the newly elected House Democrats, who stood up and chanted, “USA, USA.”

“I think he didn’t realize that all the female jobs he created were for [congresswomen],” Gillibrand said after the speech.

The Democratic candidates stood and applauded with everyone in the chamber when Trump recognized World War II veterans, a SWAT team member and a childhood cancer survivor.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., sat stoically as Trump denounced socialism. Sanders, who calls himself a democratic socialist, is widely considered likely e to enter the presidential race. Unlike Sanders, Gillibrand and Harris stood and applauded as Trump said, “America will never be a socialist country.”

TRUMP STRIKES CHORD WITH WOMEN, FALLS FLAT ON BIPARTISAN BORDER WALL PITCH

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump got one of his biggest rounds of applause during his State of the Union address Tuesday night when he noted that Congress now has a record-high number of elected women, but it wasn’t lost on the crowd that when the women rose to cheer they were mostly on the Democratic side of the aisle.

“Americans can be proud that we have more women in the workforce than ever before,” Trump said as the women lawmakers rose to clap and celebrate. He then advised them “Don’t sit. You’re going to like this.”

“Exactly one century after the Congress passed the constitutional amendment giving women the right to vote, we also have more women serving in the Congress than at any time before,” he said. There were 117 women elected to Congress in 2018.

Bipartisan chants of “USA! USA!” filled the chamber as both the Democrats and Republicans broke into uproarious applause. Many of the Democratic women wore white and donned pins that read “ERA YES,” in a nod to the women of the suffragette movement.

Trump called his list of priorities “the agenda of the American people” in his second State of the Union address Tuesday, which was delayed a week because of the 35-day government shutdown, which didn’t end until the previous Friday. The address was the first the president has delivered before the new Democratic majority in the House.

The president remained on-script for the duration of the 84-minute speech and touted his administration’s achievements from the past two years. He also laid out several legislative priorities going forward, including a “smart, strategic, see-through steel barrier,” an infrastructure bill and the eradication of HIV and AIDS.

Rep. French Hill, R-Ark., was glad that health care was a topic in the speech, while Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., described the speech as “terrific.”

“We haven’t gotten that right when it comes to protection our citizens with pre-existing conditions, correcting all the problems and costs associated with the ACA,” French said. “I like that he kept an emphasis on that while also tackling the prescription drug process.”

For Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., laying out these broad initiatives wasn’t enough.

“I wrote down a number of initiatives — defense spending, cancer research, transportation, infrastructure — and never heard anything of how we’re going to pay for them,” he said.

The president also pushed his plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria and to reduce drastically the number of troops in Afghanistan.

Among Democrats, reactions were mixed as Trump highlighted his achievements. When Trump lauded the U.S. increase in gas and oil production, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., who has championed a Green New Deal to address accelerating climate change, remained seated.

Many Democrats applauded Trump’s push for a new infrastructure bill and decision to withdraw troops from Syria and Afghanistan.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who sat behind Trump with Vice President Mike Pence, was clearly following a printed version of the speech. She applauded when Trump mentioned criminal justice reform and bipartisan efforts on lowering drug costs and furthering women’s rights.

After praising a recent bipartisan effort to secure criminal justice reform, Trump shifted to a project he said would require the same bipartisan effort: a southern border wall.

“Simply put, walls work and walls save lives,” he said. “So let’s work together, compromise and reach a deal that will truly make America safe.”

However, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was not encouraged by the president’s attempt to strike a bipartisan tone.

“I just don’t think he is to be trusted,” she said. “This is not a president who is working for the middle class of this country.”

Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., said that while parts of Trump’s speech were good, he was too combative at times.

“There should have been more emphasis on the fact that the government was shut down and we all need to work together to bring it back,” he said. “Blaming the Democrats is not going to keep the government open.”

Freshmen members of Congress excited, disappointed at their first State of the Union address

WASHINGTON — Before attending his first State of the Union address, Rep. Jefferson Van Drew, D-N.J., felt a sense of excitement and joy, but also feared the president might once again fan partisan flames by rehashing controversial issues.

“I hope that right now, he doesn’t talk about closing the government again. I hope he doesn’t talk right now about declaring a national emergency. I would so much rather see that we try to work together and get something done. That requires flexibility on Democrats side as well. Both sides have to do this,” said Van Drew.

Partisanship is the reason the approval rating for Congress is so low, but issues like border security, and infrastructure deserve cooperation between the two parties, said Van Drew.

“Rather than just argue and disagree and investigative and be hurtful on both sides, maybe we can actually get something get done.”

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Chris Pappas, D-N.H.

Although having been full-fledged members of Congress for a little over a month, the freshmen class of senators and representatives still retains a “sense of awe” about the State of the Union address, said Rep. Chris Pappas, D-N.H. Pappas said he hoped Trump would strike a conciliatory tone with Democrats, allowing lawmakers to avoid a second government shutdown.

Pappas brought a transgender military veteran from his home state to hear the president as a symbol of his hope that Trump’s transgender military service ban will be lifted.

“That doesn’t make us any safer and in fact plays politics with the military,” he said.

In addition to passing social justice reform, Pappas said he would like Trump to speak about the opioid crisis, prescription drug costs and infrastructure — and Trump did.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Sean Casten, D-Ill.

In Illinois Rep. Sean Casten’s dreams, Trump’s State of the Union address would make climate change a priority, but said his expectations were low. Trump did not in fact mention the environment.

“Truth is what I hope he doesn’t say is what I fear he will say,” Casten said, “which is that he’s going to threaten to shut down the government again if he doesn’t get a wall.”

Casten’s guest was Julie Caribeaux, the executive director of Family Shelter Service, which receives federal aid and provides support for victims of domestic abuse. He said domestic violence victims are some of the “primary victims” of Trump’s rhetoric.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Anthony Brindisi, D-N.Y.

Rep. Anthony Brindisi, D-NY, was hoping for a message of bipartisanship and unity, things that “the American people are calling for.” Trump did call on Congress to act together on many issues.

Brindisi’s top priorities this year are trying to find common ground with the Republicans on immigration reform, infrastructure and lowering prescription drug costs. On infrastructure, he said he specifically wanted to hear Trump’s ideas on investing in job training programs. Trump mentioned all the issues, but with little specificity except that he wants a border wall and enforcement to stop what he called “caravans of migrants” heading to the southern border.

“Those are things that I talked about during the campaign that many people back in upstate New York are calling for and those are things I hope he does say,” Brindisi said.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev.

Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev., said she gets excited every time she walks onto the House floor, and Tuesday was no exception. Although there were parts of the speech she did not agree with, namely Trump’s insistence on a border wall, Lee said she appreciated the call for bipartisanship.

Lowering prescription drug prices, investing in infrastructure and a comprehensive border control strategy — these are all components of his speech Lee said she could agree with.

“These are all ideas I can get behind and they work together to produce some results for American families,” she said.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Deb Halaand, D-N.M.

Rep. Deb Haaland, D-N.M., said she was dismayed about Trump’s urgency regarding funding for a border wall.

“I wasn’t surprised. Let’s put it that way about the president’s speech. I mean, of course, we don’t want a wall,” said Halland. “He instilled fear and everybody about the danger, you know, the danger that’s coming across the border.”

Haaland hopes to focus on promoting awareness about climate change and wished the President would be more receptive to the diverse issues and people around the country.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Chuy Garcia, D-Ill., said he enjoyed his first State of the Union in a historical sense, but wanted President Trump to address issues he feels are important, including raising the minimum wage and healthcare.

Rep. Jesus “Chuy” Garcia, D-Ill.

He said while the president did mention lowering prescription drug costs, there was another area of healthcare that was not noted, such as the millions who do not have healthcare at all.

“He wrapped himself around a lot of patriotism and recognition of your courageous battles and victories and but in the end, I think he failed to address important things more,” Garcia said.

 

 

Post-SOTU Interviews with Illinois Democratic Reps. Jan Schakowski and Cheri Bustos

Our Alex Lederman sat down with Illinois Democratic Reps. Jan Schakowski and Cheri Bustos after the State of the Union to hear their thoughts on President Obama’s address.

Schakowski — Evanston’s congresswoman since 1999 — said “(Obama)’s vision of what makes our country strong was so human and so true.”

Bustos said Obama is focused on the future — our children and grandchildren — and working together to solve the nation’s problems.

Medill on the Hill produces live State of the Union broadcast

WASHINGTON — It was the third day of reporting for the 21 students in Medill on the Hill. It also happened to be the day the president would deliver his final State of the Union address.

Months ago, buoyed by the excitement of the possibilities and the folly of youth, some of us came up with the idea of taking Medill on the Hill to a new level — producing live TV while also finding new ways of storytelling for the website and social media.

On State of the Union night, Jan. 12, the Washington web team led by Alex Duner and Celena Chong managed the flow of copy and constant web updates streaming in from reporters around Capitol Hill and elsewhere in D.C. There also was a constant stream of @medillonthehill tweets and snapchats as well as several Periscopes.

Tyler Kendall, Allyson Chiu and Shane McKeon were responsible for the main story, and Chiu said the experience was, “the highlight” of her journalism career.

“It was hectic, crazy and we were definitely all running on adrenaline by the end of the night,” she said.

Other reporters were assigned to stories on specific issues the president mentioned, or how local college students reacted to the speech. One even tweeted the speech in Spanish.

My task was to produce the Washington end of a live television broadcast.

Nine months ago Jesse Kirsch came back from 2015 Medill on the Hill with an idea for Carlin McCarthy, another producer with the Northwestern News Network, and me.

He said, with the optimism of a television anchor, that for the 2016 State of the Union we should produce a live broadcast with analysts at our home studio in Evanston and reporters in our D.C. bureau and on Capitol Hill. I said, with the skepticism of a television producer, that I thought he was crazy.

It took long nights, patience and a lot of support from the Medill faculty and staff, but we pulled it off.

Jesse opened the show in Evanston and before we knew it Isabella Gutierrez was doing a live hit from the Washington bureau. Then we were live in Statuary Hall with Noah Fromson, followed by a live report from graduate student Ryan Holmes on what to watch for just minutes before we streamed the live feed of President Barack Obama addressing a joint session of Congress for his final State of the Union.

We did a live interviews with Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin, wrote scripts while we counted down the seconds until they were read and gathered quotes from senators and members of Congress. Alex Lederman also provided quick-turn video interviews with two congresswomen.

Associate Producer Geordan Tilley, who interviewed Durbin, was nervous before the show, but she said she is proud of the Medill effort.

“I thought the show was some of our best work, Tilley said. “Especially considering how many firsts were involved, not the least of which was our first time going live.”

 

 

Medill Today | Tuesday, March 10, 2026