Lawmakers press HHS Secretary on unaccompanied migrant children

During a House Judiciary Immigration Subcommittee hearing Wednesday, Republican lawmakers pressed Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra over concerns that the department may be prioritizing speed over public safety when placing unaccompanied migrant children with sponsors.

Experts speculate potential Russian response to Kyiv’s use of Western weapons

As the world braces for Moscow’s response to Kyiv’s use of U.S. and UK-made missiles to strike into Russian territory, experts agree that no nuclear weapon use is to come. There might be an escalation in hybrid attacks on European soil, though.

Lawmakers clash on partisan immigration records in hearing on migrant children trafficking

In a joint hearing, the House Subcommittees on Border Security and Oversight clashed on President Biden and Trump’s immigration records while witnesses provided testimony on migrant child trafficking.

Trump’s shadow looms as Ukraine allies mark 1,000 days of the war

As tensions escalate and uncertainty looms over the future of the conflict, U.S. and Ukrainian officials face the delicate task of balancing their advocacy for Ukraine with attempts to curry favor with President-elect Donald Trump.

Protesters call for ending U.S. aid to Israel at postponed House Homeland Security Committee meeting

Protesters mimicked voting on resolutions to end all U.S. aid to the Israeli military, and called for a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war.

Latest in Campaign 2024

Latest in Politics

Trump’s shadow looms as Ukraine allies mark 1,000 days of the war

WASHINGTON — On Tuesday, Nov. 19, Ukraine marked 1,000 days since Russia launched its full-scale invasion with a military milestone—its first use of the U.S.-manufactured Army Tactical Missile Systems to strike into Russian territory.

The move came days after President Joe Biden’s administration approved Kyiv’s long-sought demand to use American-manufactured weapons to strike deep into Russia.

Shortly after, Russian President Vladimir Putin formalized changes to the country’s nuclear doctrine, lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons and enshrining Russia’s right to respond to “aggression by any non-nuclear state with the participation or support of a nuclear one” in what appears to be a direct reference to the Biden administration’s action.

As tensions escalate and uncertainty looms over the future of the conflict, U.S. and Ukrainian officials face the delicate task of balancing their advocacy for Ukraine with attempts to curry favor with President-elect Donald Trump.

“I look forward to working with President Donald Trump to rebuild the deterrence that the Biden-Harris regime has wandered into endless one-sided war, one with Ukrainian sovereign borders,” Joe Wilson (R.-S.C.), the U.S. Helsinki Commission Chair, said in an opening statement at the commission’s hearing to acknowledge the war’s milestone on Tuesday. 

Still, Wilson expressed his support for continuing and accelerating U.S. support of Ukraine, diverging from Trump’s national security approach.

“Unprecedented restrictions that should have never been applied to an ally have led tragically to countless Ukrainian deaths, and have put the world in greater danger than ever before,” Wilson said, adding that  “peace through strength is ensuring that Ukraine can strike legitimate military targets within Russia.”

Key Trump allies, such as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and the president-elect’s son Donald Trump Jr., have accused President Joe Biden of trying to start World War III by lifting the restriction. Trump himself has not commented on the development, but has criticized the amount the U.S. has spent on supporting Ukraine and pledged to end the war swiftly, repeatedly saying he could end it “in a day.”

Steve Cohen, (D-Tenn.) a member of the Helsinki Commission, noted that Wilson’s outspoken support for Ukraine might hurt his political future under the president-elect’s government.

“At this time, he’s seeking a higher position on the Foreign Affairs Committee, which I hope he gets, but some of his support for Ukraine may be used against him because of the change of administrations,” Cohen said.

“I don’t have much hope for the continued American support which Ukraine needs, but they’ll have mine, and I think they’ll have most of the Democrats, and hopefully they’ll have Republicans like Joe Wilson too,” Cohen added.

Ukraine and Trump 

Ukrainian officials speaking at the hearing also appeared preoccupied with getting in Trump’s good grace. 

“​​We cannot call a pause in the war ‘peace.’ We cannot say that justice has been solved while Russian war criminals are still smiling,” Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a message pre-recorded specifically for the hearing. 

The statement appears to be a criticism of the mounting pressure to pursue peace talks with Moscow. Among the main advocates for the negotiations is Trump’s incoming administration: Vice-President JD Vance outlined a plan that critics call an equivalent to a Russian victory, with Moscow retaining de facto control over the Ukrainian territory it occupies now and Ukraine left with no membership to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO, which it has sought after.

“This war must end in accordance with international law, with peace built through strength, so that Russian forces can never again shatter peace anywhere, anywhere in the world,” Zelenskyy added, paying tribute to Trump’s own pledge. The president-elect has promised “peace through strength” in announcements of several key nominees, and Secretary of State-designate Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) also used the phrase.

This statement is the latest in a series of Zelenskyy’s apparent attempts to win favor with Trump. He told Ukrainian broadcaster Suspilne on Friday, Nov. 15, that Trump’s reelection as president means the conflict will “end faster,” playing to Trump’s “dealmaker” reputation. The Ukrainian leader was also among the first to congratulate the president-elect on his victory, saying he appreciates “President Trump’s commitment to the ‘peace through strength’ approach in global affairs.”

Foreign Minister of Ukraine Andrii Sybiha also attempted to strike a balance between opposing Trump’s alleged plans to strike a deal with Russia and building rapport with the president-elect.

“When facing such a brutal and lawless regime as Putin’s Russia, there can be no alternative to peace through strength,” Sybiha said in testimony at the hearing, honoring Trump’s national security approach.

“Ukraine will not accept any initiative that suggests compromises on our sovereignty or territorial integrity,” he added. “Rewarding Russia with territorial gains will not restore peace, but instead provoke further aggression.”

Protesters call for ending U.S. aid to Israel at postponed House Homeland Security Committee meeting

WASHINGTON — The gallery filled and protesters chanted, but the House Homeland Security Committee hearing entitled “Worldwide Threats to the Homeland” did not start on Wednesday.

The hearing, which would be the second on the same topic hosted by this committee, was slated to focus on issues related to the southern border, while also touching on threats from Russia and the Middle East.

Instead, protesters arrived early and staged a mock hearing, sitting in the committee members’ chairs and agreeing to resolutions ending U.S. support and involvement in the Israel-Hamas war. One protester acted as a pretend chairwoman, declaring a resolution to end all U.S. aid to Israel as “unanimously agreed” to.

Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas was slated to testify at the hearing. Mayorkas’s tenure at DHS has been marred by partisan accusations of dereliction of duty surrounding the influx of crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border, which led to a successful impeachment by House Republicans with a near-party line vote in January. 

FBI Director Christopher Wray, appointed by former President Donald Trump, and Brett Holmgren, acting director of the National Counterterrorism Center, were also scheduled to testify.

Instead, demonstrators homed in on the Israel-Hamas war before the hearing was scheduled to begin, with many arriving more than an hour early. Some wore matching keffiyeh, a traditional cotton headdress worn in parts of the Middle East, and shirts adorned with the names and photos of children killed in Gaza.

Multiple people in the group, the majority of which were women, wore pink-colored keffiyeh, a reference to their membership in the anti-war non-profit Code Pink: Women for Peace. 

“Bombs and weapons and guns do not keep us safe,” the protesters chanted before the hearing. “We keep us safe, the community keeps us safe, stop arming Israel.”

Protester Ann Wright said they have been focused on this issue for over a year, staging events across Washington and in both chambers of Congress.

Recently, some senators have proposed a measure to appease these protesters’ demands. Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, announced he would call for a floor vote on the “Joint Resolutions of Disapproval,” a piece of legislation pushed by progressives to end weapons shipments to the State of Israel. The measure is unlikely to pass, as members from both sides of the aisle have spoken against it.

But some protesters seek more than just the cut-off of U.S. weapons.

“I’m from Hawaii, but I’ll be here until we have a ceasefire,” Wright said. “I’ve been opposing U.S. international action for 21 years, and I’m not stopping anytime soon.”

At the mock hearing, the group held up signs on printer paper reading, “Israel: A threat to national security.”

Upon learning of the hearing’s postponement, the group planned where they would protest for the remainder of the day, splitting their time between the House and Senate chambers before returning tomorrow for the Senate Homeland Security committee hearing.

Latest in Education

Republican senators slam delays for student financial aid forms

WASHINGTON –  Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) announced Thursday that he and other senators are directing the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, to examine  the delays surrounding the updates to the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) form. 

The Education Department said earlier this week that colleges and universities will now receive the key information during the first half of March instead of late January. 

This new timeline further delays when students will receive their financial aid packages, and ultimately see whether they can afford college 

Most college acceptance decisions come out in March or April, but the delay means that colleges won’t be able to send out aid packages until weeks afterward. Most colleges require students to accept offers by May 1, so it will be a tight turnaround for many high school seniors to see if their aid packages match up with their dream college.

The Department of Education had to fix a problem with the way it calculates how much a family can contribute to tuition. The Student Aid Index calculation replaced the Expected Family Contribution formula; however, the department initially did not correctly account for inflation.

The updated tables “will allow students to benefit from an additional $1.8 billion in aid and ensure that all students can access the maximum financial aid they are eligible for,” the Education Department said in a press release

Cassidy, ranking member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, placed blame on the Biden administration, saying at a news conference on Thursday that it had “upside down priorities.” 

The rollout of the new form was far bumpier than intended by the Department of Education.

It soft launched on Dec. 30 but was not fully available for students to fill out until Jan. 8. Last school year,  the form was available starting Oct. 1. 

Starting with the 2024-2025 award year, a normally tedious process was supposed to be simplified. The most noteworthy differences included a faster application process and an increase in eligibility for federal Pell Grants. 

“We are moving the federal financial aid application into the 21st century,” said Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona, “putting affordable higher education within the reach of 610,000 students from families with low incomes.”

The latest changes to the form are a part of the FAFSA Simplification Act passed by Congress in 2020, so the Biden administration had roughly three years to implement the new system. 

“If ever there was a time for the department to signal to the American people, listen, we squandered our dollars. But now we’re going to tighten our belts. And we’re going to do it right and come up with a solution to this problem that we created,” Cassidy said. 

“Instead, it is kind of like, ‘Oh, I’m sorry, pitiful us.’”

Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Sen. Shelly Moore Capito (R-W.Va) and Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) joined Cassidy in underscoring their disappointment in the rollout. 

“What we need is transparency for Iowa families, and that’s why I’m demanding an investigation,” Ernst said. “No more delay Department of Education. We need to get this straightened out right now.”

While there have been unexpected delays in the process, the Department of Education is committed to continuing to “provide regular progress updates to schools and stakeholders.”

More than 3.1 million FAFSA forms have been successfully submitted since the application launched.

Ahead of DEI ban, UTD grapples with student expression, transparency

For 15 years, three large boulders located on the University of Texas at Dallas campus were used to publicize events, display art and present political messages. 

After Hamas’ Oct. 7 terrorist attack of Israel, which killed about 1,200 people, and Israel’s subsequent assault on Gaza, which has killed more than 17,000 Palestinians, the boulders – dubbed the Spirit Rocks – became a campus hot spot in the pro-Israeli and pro-Palestinian student messaging campaign. Sometimes, these designs changed in a matter of minutes

At 2:16 a.m. on Oct. 12, the main boulder was painted with the Palestinian flag with the message, “Free Palestine.” Nine minutes later, the rock was painted over with the Israeli flag. By 2 p.m. on Oct. 12, it was split in half: the left with a pro-Israel message and the right with a pro-Palestinian message.

Student Government President Srivani Edupuganti said leading up to Thanksgiving break, political discourse around Israel and Gaza had died down, and the Spirit Rocks weren’t being painted over as frequently. 

On Nov. 20, students planned to paint the Spirit Rocks for the Transgender Day of Remembrance. When they showed up, the three boulders were missing. In their place were three freshly planted trees. 

“The fact that they were removed so sneakily left students under the impression that they were removed because of the Israeli and Palestinian discourse,” Edupuganti said. 

In an email to students, staff and faculty, the Division of Student Affairs said the Spirit Rocks were removed because they “were not intended to be a display for extended political discourse.” The Division of Student Affairs did not respond to a request for a comment. 

However, since their beginning in 2008, the Spirit Rocks have continually displayed political messages. As early as 2009, students painted the rocks to support the Iranian Green Movement. In 2011, students used the rocks to protest the arrest of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, and in 2015, students painted a design in support of the Black Lives Matter movement. 

“It seems weird that now (the Middle East conflict), for some reason, was the breaking point, even though students have been civil and peaceful,” said Junior Anika Sultana. 

UTD is one of many national universities grappling with student expression amidst the conflict in Gaza. 

Jade Steinberg, soon to be UTD Hillel President, said UTD has also failed to take action after antisemitic events on campus. Steinberg said someone vandalized a student’s door, which had a mezuzah, a traditional Jewish doorpost decoration. Steinberg also said a Jewish student was called a slur on the way to class, and when UTD Hillel painted the Spirit Rocks, students shouted “baby killers.”

“We’ve tried to explain to (the administration) how we don’t necessarily feel safe or heard on campus,” Steinberg said. “And so far, unfortunately, nothing has really come of that besides the removal of the Spirit Rocks.”

Steinberg said the removal “lit a new fire” under the tension at UTD. Starting on Nov. 27, the Progressive Student Coalition organized a week of protests over the Spirit Rocks’ removal. Students gathered at the former site of the rocks, painted pebbles with the Palestinian and pride flag and drew pro-Palestinian art on the sidewalk by the student center.

Sultana said students are fearful UTD may take away other platforms for student expression. Fatimah Azeem, Editor-in-Chief of The Mercury, UTD’s independent student newspaper, said although the Spirit Rocks were not the only way to exercise free speech, they were the most popular and barrier-free. 

“It’s not like anything else on campus,” Azeem said. “It’s not like putting up a flier, which can be taken down or putting up a bulletin board, which you have to get pre-approval for. (The Spirit Rocks) don’t have all these layers of bureaucracy.”

Azeem said the administration has been “evasive” when students and Mercury reporters approach with questions regarding the Spirit Rocks’ removal. 

She said on Nov. 29, Vice President of Student Affairs Dr. Gene Fitch hosted an event with pizza to help students relax ahead of finals week. Students asked Fitch about the decision to remove the Spirit Rocks, Azeem said. 

“He literally answered with, ‘I’m standing here serving pizza, thank you,’” Azeem said. 

Sultana, who is also a graphic designer and contributor for The Mercury, said UTD students have felt left in the dark when it comes to campus speech. 

“At this point, it’s really frustrating because whenever we go to admin for answers, they just run,” Sultana said. “And it’s not like the student body isn’t willing to compromise with them either.”

During Homecoming Weekend, Sultana said the administration requested students stop changing the Spirit Rocks’ design during the weekend. Sultana said students respected the administration’s wishes. The administration should work with students when making decisions that will impact campus life, Sultana said. 

Edupuganti said the administration did not consult Student Government when deciding to remove the Spirit Rocks, even though they were a “Student Government-supported installation.”

“(The Spirit Rocks’ removal) is something that dealt a blow to that trust in the relationship,” Edupuganti said.

Student Government Senator Avinash Chivakula said the administration’s choice to remove the Spirit Rocks is indicative of a larger problem on campus. He said the removal has further fractured the trust students have in the administration’s ability to facilitate productive conversations around nuanced political issues.

“It’s very much a lack of administrative foresight,” Chivakula said. “And we’re going to see more of that, especially with SB 17 and a further lack of administrative cohesion.”

SB 17 comes amidst a national conservative opposition to diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in higher education. The law prohibits Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) offices at public colleges and universities. 

The law also prevents institutions from asking for DEI statements; giving preferential treatment in the hiring process based on race, sex or ethnicity; and requiring participation in DEI training. 

SB 17 does not affect student organizations and academic course instruction. 

Chivakula, however, said the burden to foster open conversations around DEI and politicized topics will fall unfairly on students. These issues are intimate and emotional, Chivakula said, but that doesn’t mean the university’s response should be suppression. 

“A campus’s job is to facilitate opportunities for students to let out those emotions because I don’t think anger is inherently a bad thing,” Chivakula said. 

Steinberg said the elimination of UTD’s DEI office will make students feel less confident in the administration’s ability to support minority students. It is more difficult for Hillel UTD to feel it has “allies” within the administration, Steinberg said, especially after the antisemitic incidents. 

Since SB 17’s passing, Student Government has asked the UTD administration for greater transparency and clarity around its policies, Edupuganti said. In May, the Student Government passed a resolution asking for the administration to use an “open decision-making process” and use open forums to hear students’ input. 

In November, the UTD Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion attended a Student Government meeting and presented on what will happen to different programs once SB 17 takes effect in 2024. 

In a Nov. 29 email, Benson told students, faculty and staff the Office of Campus Resources and Support will replace the Office of DEI. The new office will “enhance student community-building and support employees and employee resource groups.” In the email, Benson said details were still being ironed out.

Azeem said since that email, the administration has been receptive to questions about DEI. But due to the uncertainty around SB 17, they may not be able to provide answers, she said.

Azeem said one step the administration can take to address campus unrest is reinstating the Spirit Rocks. Edupuganti said Student Government has passed a resolution calling for the reinstatement, but it has not gone to the president’s office yet. 

Chivakula said UTD should be transparent around its administrative decisions so that the school can work toward its goal, which should be to foster growth amongst its student body. 

“There’s no better place to talk about these topics than a campus where people are actively trying to learn and be better,” Chivakula said.

Health & Science

Why voters chose to protect abortion and vote for Donald Trump, according to experts

WASHINGTON– Experts say the successful protection of abortion rights in seven states Tuesday shows reproductive rights are popular among voters. However, an interesting scenario in four states is raising questions about the issue.

Voters in Nevada, Arizona, Montana and Missouri voted for both state amendments to protect reproductive rights and former President Donald Trump, helping him win the 2024 presidential election. 

The former President has taken credit for the fall of Roe v. Wade in 2022, removing federal protections for abortion rights. Trump nominated three justices to the Supreme Court, all of whom voted to overturn the 1973 decision in the case Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. 

The two outcomes represented a stark “dissonance” among voters, according to Melissa Goodman, Executive Director of the UCLA Center on Reproductive Health, Law and Policy. She said that voters simultaneously voted to protect and harm those rights.

“We have these overwhelming wins in ballot measures to protect abortion rights around the nation and a majority of voters obviously elected Donald Trump, which will unquestionably have extremely devastating consequences for reproductive health care access and gender equality in our country for the next four years,” Goodman said. 

Exit polling shows abortion was not the most important thing on voters minds in the voting booth. According to a Washington Post report, 66% of voters felt the economy and “the state of democracy” were the most important issues. On abortion, polling found just 14% of voters had reproductive rights as their top issue. 

Goodman contends that a big reason for the lesser concern and disconnected results was that Donald Trump effectively “obfuscated” his own views and policies on the issue. She points to the former president’s repeated commitment to leave things to the states and at times murky view on signing a national abortion ban.

“In these states where they had the ability to kind of express their views about abortion in the way of a state ballot measure, that was the way they expressed their feelings on that subject, and then possibly felt free to express their opinion on other topics in their candidate votes,” Goodman says. 

Long-time Democratic party pollster Celinda Lake agrees. She said the state amendments “almost gave [voters] permission” to vote on their other concerns by making it “impossible for [politicians] to act further on the abortion issue.”

Lake said that Vice President Kamala Harris did a “brilliant job on the abortion issue,” and that her loss was not a failure in her messaging on reproductive rights. She said the results of the election and abortion amendments shows Harris fell short in her messaging about the economy, something Lake says is a long-time issue in Democratic platforms. But the issue in Lake’s eyes isn’t the quality of the policy, but trouble with getting the word out about them. 

According to Lake, she found through focus groups that 60% of people don’t really know what Democrats stand for economically, and that lack of clarity may have impacted voters when deciding who to give the economic reins to for the next four years. 

“We don’t have an economic brand, and we start out every campaign 20 points behind on the economy,” Lake says. “We have to step back and have an economic brand that works for working people.”

Goodman and Lake both said that pollsters, strategists and academics will have to work to find out what happened this election, and understand how abortion was outshone by other concerns. 

But they agree the takeaway here should not be that abortion does not matter to voters. 

“There remains extremely strong support for abortion rights throughout this country, despite the actual presidential election result,” Goodman said.

NASA’s Parker Solar Probe Completes Final Venus Flyby

WASHINGTON – NASA’s Parker Solar Probe executed its final gravity-assist maneuver on Wednesday, flying past the surface of Venus and setting it on a path to come within 3.86 million miles of the solar surface, the closest any human-made object has ever come to the sun. 

The probe used gravitational pull to alter its trajectory, coming within 233 miles of the surface of Venus, according to a NASA press release. Parker has now completed seven flybys of Venus in preparation for its approach to the sun, which will occur on Dec. 24, 2024. 

“The physics of how the energy from the sun turns into space weather, which affects the earth, is not well understood,” said Dr. James Lattis, professor of astronomy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Director of the UW Space Place. The probe’s solar approach will be instrumental in understanding space weather, or conditions in the portion of space closest to Earth’s surface, which includes magnetic fields and particles that affect the earth. 

“The main goal of this probe is to improve our understanding of that very important physics,” Lattis said. 

NASA launched the Parker Solar Probe in 2018 in order to garner more data about the sun’s outermost layer, called its corona, and the magnetic processes that occur on the solar surface. Entering Venus’ gravity is critical to the mission in order to slow the probe’s trajectory prior to its solar approach, during which it will come within an unprecedented 3.86 million miles of the solar surface, according to NASA. 

Additionally, images taken during the flyby will contribute to NASA’s knowledge of the conditions on Venus’ surface. The Wide-Field Imager for Parker Solar Probe (WISPR) is the imaging instrument on the Parker Probe, and during previous Venus assist maneuvers, WISPR captured images of Venus’ surface below its thick cloud cover. 

“This is an unexpected bonus science,” said Dr. Adam Szabo, chief of the Heliospheric Physics Laboratory at NASA. “Parker Solar Probe was not designed to do planetary science, but since we are flying next to Venus, we started to assess ‘well, what can we do to look at the planet?’”

In 1989, NASA launched the Magellan spacecraft, which studied the topography of Venus. Szabo noted that the more current images taken by WISPR showed possible physical and chemical changes to Venus’s surface since the Magellan mission. Wednesday’s final gravity assist maneuver will provide additional information regarding these potential changes. 

“We’re actually able to compare what changes have happened over time. We don’t really understand the geology of Venus that well, so it’s an opportunity to see how things have changed, and try to think about why it’s changed in the years since Magellan,” said Dr. Veronica Dike, a post-doctoral research associate at the University of Illinois. 

Astronomists look forward to the probe’s findings following its Dec. 24 approach, especially since there is still so much to learn about how the sun functions. 

“The big takeaway with this flyby of Venus is that we are going to get closer than humanity has ever gotten to a star before,” Dike said. “I think it’s a big engineering achievement that we built something that can get as close as the Parker Solar Probe will.”

Latest in Environment

Congress presses Coast Guard on Arctic icebreaker shortfalls amid growing international competition

WASHINGTON — Transportation committee ranking member Richard Larsen (D-Wash.), questioned Coast Guard leadership on the U.S. ability to ice break in the Arctic Circle compared to competitors Russia and China after the Government Accountability Office released a scathing report about the operations.

The U.S. Coast Guard is tasked with managing American responsibilities in the Arctic through its presence in Alaska.  This team’s primary aim is icebreaking recapitalization, which involves regulating the quantity of and patrolling ice in the Arctic Circle. 

Despite this, the American fleet has only two ships capable of breaking heavy ice in the Arctic. Russia has 55 vessels and China, which does not have an Arctic coast, has four.

Rep. John Garamendi (D-Calif.), appeared frustrated about the timeline for new ships still being many years away. He asked the panel whether the U.S. is threatened by our lack of ships.

“We have a national security threat now,” Coast Guard Vice Admiral Peter Gautier said. “We need eight to nine ships as soon as possible, but it’s going to take a long time to build them.”

In recent years, this task has become more difficult, with longer and colder winters affecting much of the northern hemisphere. Alaska and, by extension, the Arctic Circle are valuable to United States national security, serving as the closest domestic military port to Russia.

Chairman Daniel Webster said the U.S. needs to catch up in our need for more icebreaking ships. 

“It is well beyond time to carry out our mission with new ships,” Webster said. “Nearly a year has passed [since Congress first inquired] and we don’t have a plan.”

Vice Admiral Thomas Allan Jr. emphasized that the Coast Guard must receive support from the Navy in this process, as these new ships will be the Coast Guard’s first icebreakers in more than fifty years.

“We do not have enough to complete ship one,” Allan said. “The Coast Guard is a capital intensive operation, and we fall further and further behind the Department of Defense each year.” 

Larsen, whose district features the third largest domestic port with significant shipbuilding facilities, echoed this sentiment and insisted that “our presence in the Arctic equals our sovereignty.”

Heather MacLeod, who authored the GAO report and directs the Homeland Security and Justice team, testified before the subcommittee. 

“The Coast Guard has done a good job at assessing risk in the region,” MacLeod said. “But its reliance on an aging fleet has hindered the service’s ability.”

MacLeod said the program to build new ships has experienced design challenges as it does not have its own facility. The Coast Guard leases its hangar space in Alaska.

Gautier, who has served in the Coast Guard for 37 years, said the committee must consider providing more funds to Arctic operations to see successful reinvestment rather than just focusing on vessels.

“The Coast Guard is more valuable today than ever before,” Gautier said. “We promote a peaceful, stable and cooperative Arctic in this unique and challenging maritime environment.”

Allan said the first of these ships will be approved to begin production before the end of the year.

Warnings over climate finance, Paris Agreement take center stage at COP29

WASHINGTON – World leaders discussed climate change solutions at the United Nations’ climate change conference in Azerbaijan this week, amid the increasing threat of global warming during the hottest year on record.

The conference, known as COP29, brought together roughly 70,000 people from 196 countries. Talks focused on investing in ways to combat climate change and meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement.

“The world must pay up, or humanity will pay the price,” U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres said to world leaders at the opening of the summit.

2024 is on track to be the hottest year on record nearly a decade after the Paris Agreement, where 196 countries pledged to limit global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees celsius. In order to reach this goal, emissions must peak before 2025 and decline 43% by 2030, according to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change.

As global temperatures continue to rise, world leaders began to discuss plans to meet the lofty goals of the agreement at the conference.

The agenda

The World Leaders Climate Action Summit opened Tuesday morning with speeches from dozens of heads of state. Speakers emphasized commitment to a green future and called for increased action from G20 countries.

Climate finance took center stage at the conference, and U.N. speakers urged world leaders to pledge more money to the Fund for responding to Loss and Damage, which finances climate change mitigation and relief in developing countries.

Speakers also cited the potential toll of climate change on the global economy to incentivize state and business leaders to act.

“Worsening climate impacts will put inflation on steroids unless every country can take bolder climate action,” U.N. Climate Change executive secretary Simon Stiell said.

Stiell urged leaders not to make the same mistake they did during the pandemic in acting too slowly when supply chains were disrupted. He called on leaders to create a global climate finance goal at the conference.

Business leaders set the tone for climate finance at the conference with an announcement on Tuesday from a group of multilateral development banks that their collective climate financing would reach an estimated $170 billion by 2030.

Leaders from small island nations, some of the most significantly affected by climate change, urged G20 nations to contribute to international climate resilience efforts and relief funds.

“In this hour of crisis, it seems some would choose isolation over unity, self-interest over collective action,” said Bahamas Prime Minister Philip Davis. “But we, the nations most at risk, do not have the luxury to retreat.”

Davis implored his fellow world leaders to contribute to global climate finance and warned against inaction. But only some answered the call.

Major players

United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer made headlines with his announcement of new targets for emissions and climate change action. Starmer said the U.K. will aim for an 81% cut in emissions by 2035.

“There is no national security, there is no economic security, there is no global security, without climate security,” Starmer said at the conference.

Some major leaders were notably absent at the conference including U.S. President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping, heads of the top two countries in greenhouse gas emissions. Other key powers like India, France and Germany also did not send their heads of state.

John Podesta, Biden’s senior advisor on international climate policy, led the U.S. delegation at the conference, during which the Environmental Protection Agency finalized a new policy to reduce methane emissions.

The policy requires oil and gas companies to pay a fee for excessive methane emissions, following the directive of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which the Biden administration and environmental groups have called the most significant climate legislation in U.S. history.

Under the Biden administration, the U.S. has increased climate finance for developing countries from $1.5 to $9.5 billion from 2021 to 2023. Biden pledged to work with Congress to scale this number up to over $11 billion by 2024.

Donald Trump’s victory in the presidential election makes U.S. negotiations at the conference somewhat futile. The president-elect is expected to roll back many Biden-era environmental policies and regulations. Trump has promised to withdraw from the Paris Agreement as he did in his first term, reversing Biden’s act of rejoining it in 2021.

Despite the uncertain future for U.S. climate policies, Podesta reiterated the country’s ongoing commitment to fighting climate change at the conference.

“Science is still science,” Podesta said. “The fight is bigger than one election, one political cycle and one country.”

Azerbaijan in the limelight

The location of the climate conference has also garnered outrage from many activists due to Azerbaijan’s position as a major oil producer and the country’s recent conflicts with Armenia.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev acknowledged the irony of a climate change conference hosted in the city where the first industrial oil well was drilled. Aliyev called oil and gas a “gift of the God,” while also emphasizing the country’s commitment to a “green transition.”

Climate activists have accused Azerbaijan of “greenwashing,” attempting to appear more environmentally friendly than the country actually is.

Swedish activist Greta Thunberg gathered with fellow activists in Tbilisi, Georgia on Tuesday to protest Azerbaijan’s hosting of the conference, where she accused the country of being a “repressive, occupying state” in a video from the Associated Press, referring to its displacement of ethnic Armenians in September 2023.

Despite the underlying controversies, the conference opened as usual and will continue through Nov. 22 as countries evaluate the progress of old agreements and negotiate new solutions.

Latest in National Security

Trump’s shadow looms as Ukraine allies mark 1,000 days of the war

WASHINGTON — On Tuesday, Nov. 19, Ukraine marked 1,000 days since Russia launched its full-scale invasion with a military milestone—its first use of the U.S.-manufactured Army Tactical Missile Systems to strike into Russian territory.

The move came days after President Joe Biden’s administration approved Kyiv’s long-sought demand to use American-manufactured weapons to strike deep into Russia.

Shortly after, Russian President Vladimir Putin formalized changes to the country’s nuclear doctrine, lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons and enshrining Russia’s right to respond to “aggression by any non-nuclear state with the participation or support of a nuclear one” in what appears to be a direct reference to the Biden administration’s action.

As tensions escalate and uncertainty looms over the future of the conflict, U.S. and Ukrainian officials face the delicate task of balancing their advocacy for Ukraine with attempts to curry favor with President-elect Donald Trump.

“I look forward to working with President Donald Trump to rebuild the deterrence that the Biden-Harris regime has wandered into endless one-sided war, one with Ukrainian sovereign borders,” Joe Wilson (R.-S.C.), the U.S. Helsinki Commission Chair, said in an opening statement at the commission’s hearing to acknowledge the war’s milestone on Tuesday. 

Still, Wilson expressed his support for continuing and accelerating U.S. support of Ukraine, diverging from Trump’s national security approach.

“Unprecedented restrictions that should have never been applied to an ally have led tragically to countless Ukrainian deaths, and have put the world in greater danger than ever before,” Wilson said, adding that  “peace through strength is ensuring that Ukraine can strike legitimate military targets within Russia.”

Key Trump allies, such as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and the president-elect’s son Donald Trump Jr., have accused President Joe Biden of trying to start World War III by lifting the restriction. Trump himself has not commented on the development, but has criticized the amount the U.S. has spent on supporting Ukraine and pledged to end the war swiftly, repeatedly saying he could end it “in a day.”

Steve Cohen, (D-Tenn.) a member of the Helsinki Commission, noted that Wilson’s outspoken support for Ukraine might hurt his political future under the president-elect’s government.

“At this time, he’s seeking a higher position on the Foreign Affairs Committee, which I hope he gets, but some of his support for Ukraine may be used against him because of the change of administrations,” Cohen said.

“I don’t have much hope for the continued American support which Ukraine needs, but they’ll have mine, and I think they’ll have most of the Democrats, and hopefully they’ll have Republicans like Joe Wilson too,” Cohen added.

Ukraine and Trump 

Ukrainian officials speaking at the hearing also appeared preoccupied with getting in Trump’s good grace. 

“​​We cannot call a pause in the war ‘peace.’ We cannot say that justice has been solved while Russian war criminals are still smiling,” Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a message pre-recorded specifically for the hearing. 

The statement appears to be a criticism of the mounting pressure to pursue peace talks with Moscow. Among the main advocates for the negotiations is Trump’s incoming administration: Vice-President JD Vance outlined a plan that critics call an equivalent to a Russian victory, with Moscow retaining de facto control over the Ukrainian territory it occupies now and Ukraine left with no membership to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO, which it has sought after.

“This war must end in accordance with international law, with peace built through strength, so that Russian forces can never again shatter peace anywhere, anywhere in the world,” Zelenskyy added, paying tribute to Trump’s own pledge. The president-elect has promised “peace through strength” in announcements of several key nominees, and Secretary of State-designate Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) also used the phrase.

This statement is the latest in a series of Zelenskyy’s apparent attempts to win favor with Trump. He told Ukrainian broadcaster Suspilne on Friday, Nov. 15, that Trump’s reelection as president means the conflict will “end faster,” playing to Trump’s “dealmaker” reputation. The Ukrainian leader was also among the first to congratulate the president-elect on his victory, saying he appreciates “President Trump’s commitment to the ‘peace through strength’ approach in global affairs.”

Foreign Minister of Ukraine Andrii Sybiha also attempted to strike a balance between opposing Trump’s alleged plans to strike a deal with Russia and building rapport with the president-elect.

“When facing such a brutal and lawless regime as Putin’s Russia, there can be no alternative to peace through strength,” Sybiha said in testimony at the hearing, honoring Trump’s national security approach.

“Ukraine will not accept any initiative that suggests compromises on our sovereignty or territorial integrity,” he added. “Rewarding Russia with territorial gains will not restore peace, but instead provoke further aggression.”

Protesters call for ending U.S. aid to Israel at postponed House Homeland Security Committee meeting

WASHINGTON — The gallery filled and protesters chanted, but the House Homeland Security Committee hearing entitled “Worldwide Threats to the Homeland” did not start on Wednesday.

The hearing, which would be the second on the same topic hosted by this committee, was slated to focus on issues related to the southern border, while also touching on threats from Russia and the Middle East.

Instead, protesters arrived early and staged a mock hearing, sitting in the committee members’ chairs and agreeing to resolutions ending U.S. support and involvement in the Israel-Hamas war. One protester acted as a pretend chairwoman, declaring a resolution to end all U.S. aid to Israel as “unanimously agreed” to.

Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas was slated to testify at the hearing. Mayorkas’s tenure at DHS has been marred by partisan accusations of dereliction of duty surrounding the influx of crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border, which led to a successful impeachment by House Republicans with a near-party line vote in January. 

FBI Director Christopher Wray, appointed by former President Donald Trump, and Brett Holmgren, acting director of the National Counterterrorism Center, were also scheduled to testify.

Instead, demonstrators homed in on the Israel-Hamas war before the hearing was scheduled to begin, with many arriving more than an hour early. Some wore matching keffiyeh, a traditional cotton headdress worn in parts of the Middle East, and shirts adorned with the names and photos of children killed in Gaza.

Multiple people in the group, the majority of which were women, wore pink-colored keffiyeh, a reference to their membership in the anti-war non-profit Code Pink: Women for Peace. 

“Bombs and weapons and guns do not keep us safe,” the protesters chanted before the hearing. “We keep us safe, the community keeps us safe, stop arming Israel.”

Protester Ann Wright said they have been focused on this issue for over a year, staging events across Washington and in both chambers of Congress.

Recently, some senators have proposed a measure to appease these protesters’ demands. Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, announced he would call for a floor vote on the “Joint Resolutions of Disapproval,” a piece of legislation pushed by progressives to end weapons shipments to the State of Israel. The measure is unlikely to pass, as members from both sides of the aisle have spoken against it.

But some protesters seek more than just the cut-off of U.S. weapons.

“I’m from Hawaii, but I’ll be here until we have a ceasefire,” Wright said. “I’ve been opposing U.S. international action for 21 years, and I’m not stopping anytime soon.”

At the mock hearing, the group held up signs on printer paper reading, “Israel: A threat to national security.”

Upon learning of the hearing’s postponement, the group planned where they would protest for the remainder of the day, splitting their time between the House and Senate chambers before returning tomorrow for the Senate Homeland Security committee hearing.

Latest in Living

DC Residents Highlight Strengths and Shortcomings of Housing Authority Restructuring

WASHINGTON — Residents and prospective tenants appeared appreciative of new leadership, but eager to see more change at the first District of Columbia Housing Authority public oversight roundtable on Tuesday, which saw benefit recipients directly address the councilmembers overseeing the fraught government agency.

“[DCHA’s new director] Keith Pettigrew is our black panther,” voucher recipient Rhonda Hamilton said. “He knows and is experienced in how to manage a housing authority.”

This hearing was part of the authority’s three-year plan to restructure and increase transparency in the agency after a 2023 controversy involving overpaying landlords alongside an uptick in housing insecurity in Washington. 

Residents currently receiving housing assistance raised concerns that the restructuring of the DCHA organizing board only maintains one seat for local representation, while previous boards had multiple neighborhood seats.

“We want our other residents to have a vote,” Christine Spencer, a DCHA housing recipient, said. She added though that she does appreciate that she can “walk out the door and see [DCHA community] events in your neighborhood…it’s refreshing.”

Councilmember Zachary Parker (Ward 5) agreed with the need for representation. “It feels like there’s a firewall between tenants and DCHA employees,” he said.

A 2023 Washington Post investigation revealed that the DCHA, which is an independent agency of the DC government, incorrectly overpaid rent for more than 15,000 households, totaling over one million dollars per month. The investigation  also reported that many units provided for by the authority lacked adequate facilities, such as electricity and accessible entrances. This led to a turnover in management.

DCHA’s new leadership said they will need time to address these critical issues and point to the three-year plan, which involves more considerable structural changes to the authority’s operation, including better landlord oversight. 

Residents also worried about problems that the DCHA takes too long to address.

“The biggest problem I think is a breakdown in communication,” Ronald Smith, who received his voucher after twenty years on the waitlist and requires extra room for his medical equipment, said. “My voucher is only for a one bedroom unit. The space [my wife and I] live in now is deplorable. I don’t know what to do, I need to leave this place but I can’t fit in a one-bedroom.”

The plan, which would be carried out through 2027, would also provide more resources to the Office of Customer Engagement, aimed at boosting assistance and support for residents in need. 

“Whenever there’s a new administration and communication changes…it feels like I’m starting over,” Linda Brown said, a resident who worries these organizational changes will make her home unaffordable. “I just don’t feel represented.”

Despite these issues, local elected officials generally approved of the new leadership. 

“Since Keith Pettigrew took over the agency has taken big strides,” Housing Committee chair Robert C. White (At-Large) said. “It’s about creating a foundation for lasting improvement. That’s what residents want and deserve.”

VIDEO: Take Steps 2024 raises $200K for IBD Support and Research

WASHINGTON — The Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation hosted Take Steps 2024 on Saturday, drawing the largest crowd in years, according to organizers. Individuals diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), their caregivers and healthcare professionals gathered to celebrate the latest fundraising achievements.

“We’ve actually hit our goal of $200,000 this morning,” said Marissa Spratley, the fundraising manager of the foundation.

Donations will fund groundbreaking research, better treatments and programs aimed at improving the quality of life for those living with IBD.

WATCH THE VIDEO STORY HERE:

Latest Business

Supreme Court grapples with Nvidia’s bid to avoid securities fraud case

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court raised concerns Wednesday about the technical complexities required to issue a ruling on a securities lawsuit against Nvidia Corp. and CEO Jensen Huang for allegedly misleading investors on its cryptocurrency sales ahead of a crash.

Nvidia (NVDA) took a dive Wednesday morning and remained down 1.36% at U.S. market close on the Nasdaq

The nine justices were faced with deciding whether a 2018 class-action, led by Stockholm-based investment firm E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB, satisfied standards under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA). Nvidia claimed the suit to be “frivolous,” due to the plaintiff’s lack of particularity in their reliance on an expert opinion that points to undisclosed internal documents.

Litigation for securities regulation remains at the top of the agenda. The case is one of two securities fraud cases argued in high court this term — a rare number for a single term. The other case, argued last week, was a multibillion-dollar Facebook lawsuit brought by Meta shareholders over data breach risks. This year, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority has made several key rulings that weakened the power of regulatory agencies to regulate big businesses.

The Facebook and Nvidia cases present the court with how to handle corporate transparency, this time with the scope of private securities actions at stake. Ten former Securities and Exchange Commission officials backed the lawsuit, stating in an amicus brief that the complaint contained sufficient fraud allegations which the high court should uphold.

Though the Supreme Court has taken a pro-business stance with past rulings, many of the judges, both liberal and conservative, appeared skeptical of the argument presented by the attorney for Nvidia, Neal Kumar Katyal.

Katyal compared the stakeholder complaint to “cotton candy,” saying “it seems like a lot” but is “all fluff,” and claimed that the expert opinion used by the plaintiff does not fulfill particularity standards under the PSLRA.

“It’s becoming less and less clear why we took the case and why you should win it,” Justice Elena Kagan said.

“It seems like you’re asking us to engage in a type of analysis that we’re not very good at,” she added, echoing sentiments from her colleague, Justice Samuel Alito, on how the court should handle a case requiring highly technical expertise.

The expert opinion was provided by Prysm Group, an economic consulting firm. In the complaint, Prysm said that Nvidia, one of the world’s leading producers of graphic processing units (GPU’s), understated its “crypto-related GPU sales by $1.126 billion” between 2017 to 2018.

Nvidia’s GPU’s are primarily marketed for computer functions, like video games, but can also be used in cryptocurrency mining. At the beginning of 2018, Nvidia saw revenue in GPU sales increase, then fall later the same year around the time of the crypto decline, ultimately leading to a steep drop in Nvidia’s share price. CEO Jensen Huang attributed this to a “crypto hangover.”

The results found by Prsym led investors from the Swedish-based firm to accuse Nvidia of knowingly concealing the extent of the company’s reliance on cryptocurrency in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Although the Northern District of California dismissed the complaint twice due to insufficient evidence of intent (scienter), the Ninth Circuit partially reversed, allowing claims against Nvidia and Huang to proceed. 

In 2022, Nvidia agreed to a $5.5 million SEC penalty for inadequate disclosures related to cryptocurrency demand. The respondents pointed to proprietary information acquired by the SEC as a potential source to shed light on Huang’s intent to mislead shareholders.

Arguments from both sides prompted broader concerns from Chief Justice John Roberts as the court wrestled with  interpreting the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, noting, “Positions on both sides are a little too absolute. How do you find the sweet spot in terms of the PSLRA?” 

“The PSLRA was raising the bar. The idea of having variable levels of particularity is difficult to apply, and the statute is not doing what it is meant to do,” Roberts added. 

Atlantic Legal Foundation Executive Vice President & General Counsel Lawrence Ebner, who filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner, said “due process in the Private Securities Act is meant to protect corporate defendants from meritless securities fraud complaints.”

On the other hand, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson voiced concerns that high evidentiary standards could hinder plaintiffs. 

“I guess my concern is that you appear to be requiring plaintiffs to actually have the evidence in order to plead their case,” Jackson said, noting that critical evidence is often only uncovered in later stages of litigation. 

Plaintiffs further argued that private securities litigation serves “as a supplement to public enforcement to ensure that our capital markets are the best in the world.”

California-based attorney Thomas Ogden, who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondents, warned that stricter standards would “completely kill the ability to have an expert come in, write up a declaration and a report, and, you know, speculate what the company must have known,” undercutting plaintiffs’ ability to build their cases.

A decision for the case, NVIDIA Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB, is expected by summer.

Fed cuts rates, Powell emphasizes independence as Trump administration looms

WASHINGTON – The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 0.25% at its Nov. 7 meeting, with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell underscoring the central bank’s commitment to its dual mandate and reinforcing its independence in response to potential political pressures from the incoming Trump administration. 

Powell detailed the Fed’s focus on inflation, labor market stability, and rate guidance while avoiding direct engagement with questions on Trump’s possible influence over future policy.

The 0.25% rate cut underscores the Fed’s focus on balancing inflation control with labor market resilience. 

“We are committed to maintaining our economy’s strength by supporting maximum employment and returning inflation to our 2% goal today,” Powell stated, signaling the Fed’s cautious stance.

The decision reflects recent economic data, with payroll growth slowing, unemployment rising to 4.1% and wage growth easing. Despite these shifts, Powell expressed confidence in the Fed’s “appropriate recalibration” to stabilize inflation while sustaining economic growth.

Facing questions about his own future under Trump, who has been critical of Powell,  he firmly asserted that he would not resign if asked by the President-elect and stating that such interference is “not permitted under the law.” The response underscores the Fed’s statutory independence. 

Powell made clear that the Fed’s decisions are driven by economic data rather than political considerations. “Our actions affect communities, families, and businesses across the country,” he remarked, reinforcing a commitment to economic stability.

Powell stated “In the near term, the election will have no effects on policy decisions,” and avoided speculating on how Trump’s potential policies might influence the economy. 

“We don’t guess, we don’t speculate, we don’t assume,” said Powell. However, he acknowledged that over time, such policies could have economic effects that might influence the Fed’s pursuit of its dual mandate. 

“We are prepared to adjust our assessments of the appropriate pace and destination as the outlook evolves,” he stated, indicating that the Fed stands ready to adjust its approach based on evolving conditions.

Powell also addressed long-term fiscal sustainability, warning that the U.S. federal deficit is “on an unsustainable path” and poses risks to economic health. In addition, he acknowledged elevated geopolitical risks but noted that the U.S. economy has shown resilience in the face of these challenges.

Uncertainty around the scope of executive influence over the Fed remains a likely focal point as Trump takes office, especially given his hints at potential new appointments and his vocal criticism of the current chair. Powell, avoiding direct remarks on his reappointment, underscored the importance of legal protections that secure the Fed’s independence. 

Changes in Fed leadership could prompt policy shifts, introducing further unpredictability for businesses and investors.

Looking forward, Powell affirmed the Fed’s commitment to data-driven decisions, emphasizing that it would continue responding to economic indicators over political influence. 

The next Federal Reserve interest rate announcement, along with updated economic projections, is scheduled for Dec.18.

SOTU: Health Care

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Congress should approve his plan to replace Obamacare with a new health care program that would provide “affordable alternative” insurance options and criticized Democrats for trying to impose “a socialist takeover of our health care system.”

“A good life for American families requires the most affordable, innovative and high-quality health care system on earth,” Trump said in his third State of the Union address.

Trump said he has proposed health care plans that would be up to 60% cheaper than the Affordable Care Act plans. Both the White House and the Department of Health and Human Services did not respond when asked if a specific replacement plan has existed or ever will.

The president blamed Democrats for not providing the American people with the health care reforms he has promised.

“As we work to improve Americans’ health care, there are those who want to take away your health care, take away your doctor, and abolish private insurance entirely,” said Trump, referring to the Democrats.

Democrats stood up at this comment, pointed their fingers at Trump and shouted “YOU.”

Trump said 130 Democrats endorse legislation to impose a “socialist takeover” of the health care system by “taking away the private health insurance plans of 180 million.”

Democratic presidential candidates Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., are pushing for a “Medicare for All” plan that would end private health insurance while other candidates like former Vice President Joe Biden, Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., are pushing to expand on Obamacare.

“We will never let socialism destroy American health care,” Trump said.

Trump emphasized the administration’s efforts to protect patients with pre-existing conditions, to which Democrats threw up their hands and shook their heads in disagreement. Led by House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate and House Democrats brought more than 80 patients, doctors and health care advocates from across the country as guests to the speech.

“President Trump will speak to an audience filled with Americans who are suffering because of his broken promises on prescription drug costs and his all-out assault on Americans with preexisting conditions,” Pelosi said in a press release Tuesday morning.

The president also called upon Congress to pass legislation to lower prescription drug prices.

“Get a bill to my desk, and I will sign it into law without delay,” the president said.

Democrats responded to this by booing and holding up three fingers to represent H.R. 3, legislation proposed by the late Rep. Elijah E. Cummings that would require the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to negotiate certain drug prices. The bill has been on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s desk for over a month after being passed in the House.

Generic prescription drug prices dropped 1% in 2018, the first price drop in 45 years, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. Trump said it was the first time in 51 years. Brand-name drug prices, however, are still increasing.

Trump said the administration will continue to make health care more transparent by requiring hospitals to make their prices negotiated with insurers public and easily accessible online. He also pointed to the passage of administration-backed legislation called “Right to Try,” which allows terminally ill patients access to drugs not fully approved by the Food and Drug Administration if they feel they have tried all other options.

He also said he has launched new initiatives to improve care for Americans with kidney disease, Alzheimer’s and those struggling with mental health challenges, in addition to pursuing new cures for childhood cancer and AIDS.

The House Ways and Means Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday afternoon to further discuss Trump’s health care policies and overcoming pharmaceutical barriers in particular.

Trump Sticks By Wall in State of the Union Address

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump’s call for a wall to secure America’s southern border in his State of the Union address Tuesday night was no surprise to opponents.

Jennifer Johnson, the policy director at the Southern Border Communities Coalition, said Trump continually characterizes the southern border as a violent area.

“More of a reality check, these are families and children seeking protection, fleeing spiraling violence and poverty,” she said.

Chris Montoya, who served as a Customs and Border Protection agent for 21 years, said that “crime rates are pretty low in border cities. Being a border patrol agent is one of the safest law enforcement jobs. All those things together means a safe border.”

Rep.  Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y., invited as his guest a mother who had been separated from her children at the border.

Other Democrats brought undocumented immigrants as their guests, including Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., Rep. Jimmy Gomez, D-Calif., and Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-N.J.

Rep. Sheila Jackson, D-Texas, was enthusiastic about their attendance at the address. “Their presence here today is representative of the big tent that America is,” she said.

In his address, Trump attributed what he called at crisis at the border to America’s “reduced jobs, lower wages, overburdened schools, and hospitals that are so crowded you can’t get in.” He referenced San Diego and El Paso as being cities that were once violent, and now safe with the addition of physical barriers.

Trump also mentioned the prevalence of MS-13 within the country. “They almost all come through our Southern border,” he said.

Montoya said MS-13 members do enter through the southern border on rare occasions, but it is uncommon for CBP agents to make an arrest.

Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin is the ranking member on the Senate Subcommittee for Border Security and Immigration. He said nothing changed in Trump’s rhetoric. “If we’re waiting on him, we’re not going to get this solved,” he said.

Washingtonians alternately protest, celebrate the State of the Union

WASHINGTON – DC-area residents had very different reactions to President Donald Trump’s second State of the Union address Tuesday night. But whether they celebrated or denounced the event, emotions were strong.

Around 40-50 people gathered at each of two intersections near the Capitol ahead of the address  — far fewer than the 400 people who protested last year, according to Resist DC, the community action group that organized both years’ protests.

People lined the sidewalks along the streets that President Donald Trump, Vice President Mike Pence and other Trump cabinet members’ motorcades were expected pass by. They held homemade signs lit with string lights so they would be visible to government officials in their cars and chanted anti-Trump messages to music and drums.

Eileen Minarick, 70, said she was protesting simply “because the state of our union is terrible.”

Members of Herndon-Reston Indivisible, a group created to resist President Trump's policies and elect Democrats to office, held lit-up letters spelling “Fraud” and “Yuge Liar.” (Ester Wells/MNS)40-50 protestors were stationed at each of two points along 3rd Street NW in Washington, D.C. (Ester Wells/MNS)Protestors waved Russian flags as they waited along the sidewalk. (Ester Wells/MNS)A protestor held a lit-up sign as he shouted the words. (Ester Wells/MNS)Eileen Minarick, 70, said, “I don’t feel I’m protesting Trump. I’m protesting the policies of his administration, which are inhuman.” (Ester Wells/MNS)(Ester Wells/MNS)Police cars and officers patrolled the streets surrounding the Capitol, many of which were blocked off to both vehicles and pedestrians. (Ester Wells/MNS)Patrons don pink stickers and resistance apparel as they listen to activist speakers and wait for President Trump's State of the Union address to begin  (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Sitting in front of the projector, a stray star is caught on actor Danny Glover's face as he prepares to educate attendees about the conflict in Latin America. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Co-founder of CODEPINK, Madea Benjamin addresses the crowd as other speakers converse with audience members. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)The classic pairing of wine and board games is at every table, except with a twist. In order to ‘survive the night’ patrons mark a square every time President Trump utters a common saying. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Violence against women must end, said Chad Smith, a trainer with nonprofit organization Men Can Stop Rape. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)All eyes are trained on the screen as Trump enters the House Chamber for the State of the Union address. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Grinning, a man in a Make America Great Again hat listens as President Donald Trump announced “I will get it built” in reference to a southern border wall at a local Young Republicans watch party. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)A sign welcomes members of the DC Young Republicans and Arlington Falls Church Young Republicans. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Members of Republican organizations gather around as President Trump continues past expected time in his State of the Union speech. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)The scene is more mellow downstairs, where a few recluse bar patrons chat with each other as the television screens broadcast in synchrony. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)

Elsewhere in the city, local bar patrons gathered to drink beer, compete in presidential bingo and watch the State of the Union.

Grassroots activist group CODEPINK hosted a number of guest speakers, including actor Danny Glover, for a lively discussion before the main event. Topics ranged from the Bolivarian revolution to ending domestic violence.

Anita Jenkins, spokeswoman for Stand Up for Democracy, riled the crowd with a call to establish the District of Columbia the 51st state in the United States.

“The people of D.C. have no representation… We have nobody to speak for us,” she said. Modifying the words of America’s early founders, she said, “Taxation without representation is a rip-off.”

As President Trump appeared on the projector, shouts of disapproval rose from the bar patrons. The State of the Union 2019 had begun and the energy was energetic in its moroseness.

Across town, the atmosphere was also charged. Members of DC Young Republicans and Arlington Falls Church Young Republicans filled a restaurant for a celebratory viewing party.

“In the past, most of the people in this room voted for a wall… but the proper wall never got built,” said Donald Trump. He paused and then said, “I’ll get it built.” Hoots and hollers erupted in the bar and two girls were seen smiling and hugging each other.

Though Trump stressed unity in his national address, DC-area residents remained divided in their reactions.

2020 Candidates Alternate Cheers, Hisses to Trump Wall, Immigration Proposals during State of Union

WASHINGTON – Several Democratic 2020 presidential candidates expressed their displeasure with many of President Donald Trump’s policies during the State of the Union address Tuesday.

Sens. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., could be seen shaking their heads when Trump mentioned controversial topics such as his commitment to building a border wall and the dangers of migrant caravans heading to the U.S. southern border.

Harris, who announced her candidacy on Jan. 21, shook her head and visibly mouthed, “They’re not,” as Trump said, “Large, organized caravans are on the march to the United States.”

In a Facebook Live address before the State of the Union, Harris told viewers, “It’s a moment for a president to rise above politics and unite the country with a vision that includes all Americans, not just the ones who may have voted for them. It’s a moment to bring us together.”

Early in the address, Harris was often reluctant to give Trump a standing ovation, asking her colleagues, “Really?” as they cheered the president’s comments about space exploration.

The candidates and their Democratic colleagues booed and hissed as Trump labeled the numerous investigations into his campaign finance and relationship with Russia “ridiculous partisan investigations.”

“If there is going to be peace and legislation, there cannot be war and investigation,” he said. “It just doesn’t work that way!”

Democrats cheered later as Trump mentioned that women have filled 58 percent of new jobs in the past year. New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who has formed a presidential exploratory committee, pointed at the newly elected House Democrats, who stood up and chanted, “USA, USA.”

“I think he didn’t realize that all the female jobs he created were for [congresswomen],” Gillibrand said after the speech.

The Democratic candidates stood and applauded with everyone in the chamber when Trump recognized World War II veterans, a SWAT team member and a childhood cancer survivor.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., sat stoically as Trump denounced socialism. Sanders, who calls himself a democratic socialist, is widely considered likely e to enter the presidential race. Unlike Sanders, Gillibrand and Harris stood and applauded as Trump said, “America will never be a socialist country.”

TRUMP STRIKES CHORD WITH WOMEN, FALLS FLAT ON BIPARTISAN BORDER WALL PITCH

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump got one of his biggest rounds of applause during his State of the Union address Tuesday night when he noted that Congress now has a record-high number of elected women, but it wasn’t lost on the crowd that when the women rose to cheer they were mostly on the Democratic side of the aisle.

“Americans can be proud that we have more women in the workforce than ever before,” Trump said as the women lawmakers rose to clap and celebrate. He then advised them “Don’t sit. You’re going to like this.”

“Exactly one century after the Congress passed the constitutional amendment giving women the right to vote, we also have more women serving in the Congress than at any time before,” he said. There were 117 women elected to Congress in 2018.

Bipartisan chants of “USA! USA!” filled the chamber as both the Democrats and Republicans broke into uproarious applause. Many of the Democratic women wore white and donned pins that read “ERA YES,” in a nod to the women of the suffragette movement.

Trump called his list of priorities “the agenda of the American people” in his second State of the Union address Tuesday, which was delayed a week because of the 35-day government shutdown, which didn’t end until the previous Friday. The address was the first the president has delivered before the new Democratic majority in the House.

The president remained on-script for the duration of the 84-minute speech and touted his administration’s achievements from the past two years. He also laid out several legislative priorities going forward, including a “smart, strategic, see-through steel barrier,” an infrastructure bill and the eradication of HIV and AIDS.

Rep. French Hill, R-Ark., was glad that health care was a topic in the speech, while Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., described the speech as “terrific.”

“We haven’t gotten that right when it comes to protection our citizens with pre-existing conditions, correcting all the problems and costs associated with the ACA,” French said. “I like that he kept an emphasis on that while also tackling the prescription drug process.”

For Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., laying out these broad initiatives wasn’t enough.

“I wrote down a number of initiatives — defense spending, cancer research, transportation, infrastructure — and never heard anything of how we’re going to pay for them,” he said.

The president also pushed his plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria and to reduce drastically the number of troops in Afghanistan.

Among Democrats, reactions were mixed as Trump highlighted his achievements. When Trump lauded the U.S. increase in gas and oil production, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., who has championed a Green New Deal to address accelerating climate change, remained seated.

Many Democrats applauded Trump’s push for a new infrastructure bill and decision to withdraw troops from Syria and Afghanistan.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who sat behind Trump with Vice President Mike Pence, was clearly following a printed version of the speech. She applauded when Trump mentioned criminal justice reform and bipartisan efforts on lowering drug costs and furthering women’s rights.

After praising a recent bipartisan effort to secure criminal justice reform, Trump shifted to a project he said would require the same bipartisan effort: a southern border wall.

“Simply put, walls work and walls save lives,” he said. “So let’s work together, compromise and reach a deal that will truly make America safe.”

However, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was not encouraged by the president’s attempt to strike a bipartisan tone.

“I just don’t think he is to be trusted,” she said. “This is not a president who is working for the middle class of this country.”

Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., said that while parts of Trump’s speech were good, he was too combative at times.

“There should have been more emphasis on the fact that the government was shut down and we all need to work together to bring it back,” he said. “Blaming the Democrats is not going to keep the government open.”

Freshmen members of Congress excited, disappointed at their first State of the Union address

WASHINGTON — Before attending his first State of the Union address, Rep. Jefferson Van Drew, D-N.J., felt a sense of excitement and joy, but also feared the president might once again fan partisan flames by rehashing controversial issues.

“I hope that right now, he doesn’t talk about closing the government again. I hope he doesn’t talk right now about declaring a national emergency. I would so much rather see that we try to work together and get something done. That requires flexibility on Democrats side as well. Both sides have to do this,” said Van Drew.

Partisanship is the reason the approval rating for Congress is so low, but issues like border security, and infrastructure deserve cooperation between the two parties, said Van Drew.

“Rather than just argue and disagree and investigative and be hurtful on both sides, maybe we can actually get something get done.”

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Chris Pappas, D-N.H.

Although having been full-fledged members of Congress for a little over a month, the freshmen class of senators and representatives still retains a “sense of awe” about the State of the Union address, said Rep. Chris Pappas, D-N.H. Pappas said he hoped Trump would strike a conciliatory tone with Democrats, allowing lawmakers to avoid a second government shutdown.

Pappas brought a transgender military veteran from his home state to hear the president as a symbol of his hope that Trump’s transgender military service ban will be lifted.

“That doesn’t make us any safer and in fact plays politics with the military,” he said.

In addition to passing social justice reform, Pappas said he would like Trump to speak about the opioid crisis, prescription drug costs and infrastructure — and Trump did.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Sean Casten, D-Ill.

In Illinois Rep. Sean Casten’s dreams, Trump’s State of the Union address would make climate change a priority, but said his expectations were low. Trump did not in fact mention the environment.

“Truth is what I hope he doesn’t say is what I fear he will say,” Casten said, “which is that he’s going to threaten to shut down the government again if he doesn’t get a wall.”

Casten’s guest was Julie Caribeaux, the executive director of Family Shelter Service, which receives federal aid and provides support for victims of domestic abuse. He said domestic violence victims are some of the “primary victims” of Trump’s rhetoric.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Anthony Brindisi, D-N.Y.

Rep. Anthony Brindisi, D-NY, was hoping for a message of bipartisanship and unity, things that “the American people are calling for.” Trump did call on Congress to act together on many issues.

Brindisi’s top priorities this year are trying to find common ground with the Republicans on immigration reform, infrastructure and lowering prescription drug costs. On infrastructure, he said he specifically wanted to hear Trump’s ideas on investing in job training programs. Trump mentioned all the issues, but with little specificity except that he wants a border wall and enforcement to stop what he called “caravans of migrants” heading to the southern border.

“Those are things that I talked about during the campaign that many people back in upstate New York are calling for and those are things I hope he does say,” Brindisi said.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev.

Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev., said she gets excited every time she walks onto the House floor, and Tuesday was no exception. Although there were parts of the speech she did not agree with, namely Trump’s insistence on a border wall, Lee said she appreciated the call for bipartisanship.

Lowering prescription drug prices, investing in infrastructure and a comprehensive border control strategy — these are all components of his speech Lee said she could agree with.

“These are all ideas I can get behind and they work together to produce some results for American families,” she said.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Deb Halaand, D-N.M.

Rep. Deb Haaland, D-N.M., said she was dismayed about Trump’s urgency regarding funding for a border wall.

“I wasn’t surprised. Let’s put it that way about the president’s speech. I mean, of course, we don’t want a wall,” said Halland. “He instilled fear and everybody about the danger, you know, the danger that’s coming across the border.”

Haaland hopes to focus on promoting awareness about climate change and wished the President would be more receptive to the diverse issues and people around the country.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Chuy Garcia, D-Ill., said he enjoyed his first State of the Union in a historical sense, but wanted President Trump to address issues he feels are important, including raising the minimum wage and healthcare.

Rep. Jesus “Chuy” Garcia, D-Ill.

He said while the president did mention lowering prescription drug costs, there was another area of healthcare that was not noted, such as the millions who do not have healthcare at all.

“He wrapped himself around a lot of patriotism and recognition of your courageous battles and victories and but in the end, I think he failed to address important things more,” Garcia said.

 

 

Post-SOTU Interviews with Illinois Democratic Reps. Jan Schakowski and Cheri Bustos

Our Alex Lederman sat down with Illinois Democratic Reps. Jan Schakowski and Cheri Bustos after the State of the Union to hear their thoughts on President Obama’s address.

Schakowski — Evanston’s congresswoman since 1999 — said “(Obama)’s vision of what makes our country strong was so human and so true.”

Bustos said Obama is focused on the future — our children and grandchildren — and working together to solve the nation’s problems.

Medill on the Hill produces live State of the Union broadcast

WASHINGTON — It was the third day of reporting for the 21 students in Medill on the Hill. It also happened to be the day the president would deliver his final State of the Union address.

Months ago, buoyed by the excitement of the possibilities and the folly of youth, some of us came up with the idea of taking Medill on the Hill to a new level — producing live TV while also finding new ways of storytelling for the website and social media.

On State of the Union night, Jan. 12, the Washington web team led by Alex Duner and Celena Chong managed the flow of copy and constant web updates streaming in from reporters around Capitol Hill and elsewhere in D.C. There also was a constant stream of @medillonthehill tweets and snapchats as well as several Periscopes.

Tyler Kendall, Allyson Chiu and Shane McKeon were responsible for the main story, and Chiu said the experience was, “the highlight” of her journalism career.

“It was hectic, crazy and we were definitely all running on adrenaline by the end of the night,” she said.

Other reporters were assigned to stories on specific issues the president mentioned, or how local college students reacted to the speech. One even tweeted the speech in Spanish.

My task was to produce the Washington end of a live television broadcast.

Nine months ago Jesse Kirsch came back from 2015 Medill on the Hill with an idea for Carlin McCarthy, another producer with the Northwestern News Network, and me.

He said, with the optimism of a television anchor, that for the 2016 State of the Union we should produce a live broadcast with analysts at our home studio in Evanston and reporters in our D.C. bureau and on Capitol Hill. I said, with the skepticism of a television producer, that I thought he was crazy.

It took long nights, patience and a lot of support from the Medill faculty and staff, but we pulled it off.

Jesse opened the show in Evanston and before we knew it Isabella Gutierrez was doing a live hit from the Washington bureau. Then we were live in Statuary Hall with Noah Fromson, followed by a live report from graduate student Ryan Holmes on what to watch for just minutes before we streamed the live feed of President Barack Obama addressing a joint session of Congress for his final State of the Union.

We did a live interviews with Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin, wrote scripts while we counted down the seconds until they were read and gathered quotes from senators and members of Congress. Alex Lederman also provided quick-turn video interviews with two congresswomen.

Associate Producer Geordan Tilley, who interviewed Durbin, was nervous before the show, but she said she is proud of the Medill effort.

“I thought the show was some of our best work, Tilley said. “Especially considering how many firsts were involved, not the least of which was our first time going live.”

 

 

 

.

 

Medill Today | November 19, 2024