Watch: Federal workers, lawmakers and demonstrators protest USAID shutdown

Protesters held demonstrations near several government buildings Wednesday following the imminent closure of USAID and Elon Musk’s increased access.

Flamethrowing over wildfire aid: lawmakers clash over conditional aid to California

In a contentious hearing Thursday morning, lawmakers and witnesses quarreled over disaster relief and how the recent L.A. wildfires could have been prevented.

Lawmakers consider measures to combat fentanyl and illicit drug production

Through emotional testimonies, witnesses spoke about the dangers of the drug epidemic.

Watch: The Great American Water Taste Test brings friendly competition to Capitol Hill

Members of the NRWA spent the week lobbying their Congresspeople, culminating in a taste test of water samples from their home states.

Watch: Lawmakers debate paths to ‘American Energy Dominance’

House Energy Subcommittee members cited national security and lowering consumer costs as reasons to prioritize domestic energy production.

Latest in Politics

Flamethrowing over wildfire aid: lawmakers clash over conditional aid to California

WASHINGTON –  Discussions about the role overregulation played in the January wildfires that tore through Los Angeles quickly devolved into partisan flamethrowing as Republicans and several witnesses blamed Democrats for the devastating event.

“This was a man-made disaster; more precisely, a Democrat-made disaster,” witness Steve Hilton, the founder of Golden Together, a California-based think tank, and Fox News contributor said in his opening statement. Throughout the tense hearing, he clashed with Democratic lawmakers and other witnesses.

Even the name of the Thursday morning hearing, held before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust, was a point of contention.

“‘California Fires and the Consequences of Overregulation’ is a gross title misnomer,” Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-Calif.) said.

Republican lawmakers used the hearing to criticize what they saw as California’s failure to prevent the wildfires by neglecting to clear brush and conduct controlled burns.

“This is not about climate change, this is not about global warming, this is about bad land use decisions (and) bad policies,” said Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-Wyo.). She called for strings to be attached to federal wildfire aid.

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) shot back, giving an impassioned statement.

“Shame on anyone who is exploiting the pain and suffering of disaster victims to jam through partisan ideological policies,” he said. “We should get disaster aid to these disaster victims now, without conditions, just like we treat every other disaster victim across America.”

Blue states aren’t the only ones affected by natural disasters, Democrats warned, reiterating that recent aid to red states has not been conditional, as is being proposed for aid to California.

Later in the hearing, Democrats slammed Trump’s recent statements in which he floated the idea of doing away with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA. Trump has also signed an executive order establishing a council to assess FEMA. 

Democratic lawmakers also pushed back on the idea that diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives were related to the catastrophe.

“Do you believe that people in L.A. died because the fire chief is a lesbian?” Rep. Becca Balint (D-Vt.) asked witnesses. “All this talk of DEI is a complete and utter distraction from the fact that we need a plan, an actual plan, to help the people of California,” she added.

Lawmakers of both parties repeatedly ceded their time to their colleagues from California. Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), who recently toured the disaster zone, called for bipartisanship.

“‘They just want the government to help them.’ That’s what a woman told me when she stood on a pile of ashes in the Palisades,” Swalwell said. “So I just ask my colleagues: let’s work together on this. Let’s be in the solutions business.”

Lawmakers consider measures to combat fentanyl and illicit drug production

WASHINGTON — Testifying about near-death experiences and losing loved ones to fentanyl, witnesses emphasized their concerns about the drug epidemic during a hearing on Capitol Hill Thursday. 

“Someone intentionally laced that cocaine with fentanyl,” said Raymond Cullen, whose son died of the narcotic. “Our son did not accidentally overdose. He was poisoned. There is a difference. Actually, we personally feel that he was murdered.” 

Democrats and Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee aligned on the dire need to curb fentanyl production and distribution, as well as increase access to naloxone, an antidote commonly referred to as Narcan that counteracts an overdose before it becomes fatal. Many representatives emphasized their own fears of their children dying of a drug overdose or poisoning. 

Witnesses spoke about the need for an “all of the above” approach to addressing the threat of illegal drugs. Some of these measures include breaking international chains of drug commerce, enacting legislation to hinder supply and demand and providing treatment programs for people with addiction. All five speakers stressed the importance of bolstering education and prevention efforts for adolescents, parents and medical professionals. 

Democrats repeatedly emphasized that many of the programs currently in place are now at risk following President Donald Trump’s federal funding freeze that was temporarily rescinded. 

Despite two judges calling for a pause on the freeze, Yale research professor and physician scientist Deepa Camenga said she heard accounts of treatment programs already operating less effectively with fewer resources after Trump pulled back funding. 

Among the many organizations that could lose significant resources to curb and combat drug threats, Medicaid, the National Institutes of Health and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration are at risk, along with various research initiatives. 

“If Medicaid were significantly reduced, more people would die of overdoses,” said Georgetown Law professor Regina LaBelle. 

Rep. Troy Carter (D–La.) underscored such concerns. “My fear is that there may be another attempt or another approach used to slow, reduce or cut resources that would aid in the slowing and hopeful elimination of these uses of fentanyl,” he said.

Multiple witnesses and representatives emphasized the importance of labeling fentanyl as a Schedule I drug, rather than maintaining its current Schedule II status. A ratchet up in drug categorization would make fentanyl illegal for both recreational and medical use, unlike its current classification, which only bars recreational use. 

“Many of the victims of fentanyl distribution, drug distribution, themselves become incarcerated while many of the upstream distributors go off scott-free,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–N.Y.) warned. Lebelle added that the risk of overdosing is more than ten times greater for people who are released from prison than for the general public, according to the NIH.

The Committee’s hearing comes after Trump designated drug cartels as foreign terrorists, and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau did the same, appointing a “fentanyl czar.” Trump also negotiated with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum to deploy 10,000 Mexican National Guard officers to the border to curb migrants and drugs from entering the U.S. 

The CDC’s estimate of approximately 80,000 deaths from overdoses, primarily fentanyl, in 2023 demonstrates a decrease in deaths from opioids. 

“We are encouraged that we are making progress, and that is important,” Committee Chairman Buddy Carter (R–Ga.) said. “However, we can’t stop. We can’t stop until we completely eradicate this.”

Latest in Education

SCOTUS to decide evidence needed to sue employer retirement plans

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday about the evidence plaintiffs must demonstrate to sue employers over company-sponsored retirement plans. 

The case, Cunningham v. Cornell University, centers on alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), which sets minimum standards for many private retirement and benefit plans.

The high court will determine whether plaintiffs need to provide additional evidence that a fiduciary, who manages and administers plans, engaged in unlawful behavior. The ruling could affect employees’ future access to retirement plans and their ability to litigate disputes with those plans.

In a 2016 lawsuit, Casey Cunningham and other retirement plan users at Cornell said they had to pay excessive administrative fees because the university offered many investment options and hired too many recordkeepers. The complaint alleged that this practice violated ERISA’s provision that fiduciaries cannot cause transactions that constitute a “furnishing of goods, services or facilities between the plan and a party in interest.”

Several justices pressed attorneys on how ERISA’s text and various legal precedents would affect the litigation process. Justice Brett Kavanaugh said employees could exploit the plaintiffs’ argument to justify frivolous lawsuits.

“Your theory means, I think, or at least the other side says that it’s a prohibited transaction just to have recordkeeping services, and that seems nuts, right?” Kavanaugh said. “That’s what they say. And it does to me seem nuts, too. So what do we do with that?”

Two circuit courts only require plaintiffs to prove a fiduciary caused a prohibited transaction. Xiao Wang, representing the petitioners, said those courts have sufficient “guardrails” to protect against more “bare-bones” employee lawsuits.

“With respect to Congress and this court’s understanding of Congress’ intent in ERISA, it’s to provide a broadly protective and remedial statute and provide an avenue for plaintiffs to enforce ERISA’s terms and conditions,” Wang said.

Four other circuit courts require plaintiffs to provide additional proof of wrongful behavior. One such court, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, ruled in favor of Cornell in 2023 because the plaintiffs did not prove the transaction was “unnecessary or involved unreasonable compensation.”

“That’s why the Supreme Court took the case — because there needs to be an answer to the question so that you can have the uniformity that encourages plan sponsors to even have plans in the first place,” said Lindsey R. Camp, an ERISA litigation partner for Holland and Knight.

A district court previously dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint in 2017, saying it lacked evidence of “self-dealing or other disloyal conduct.”

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson discussed the “information asymmetry” between plan providers and users, the latter of whom may lack information they could otherwise use to plead their cases. Nicole A. Saharsky, arguing for the respondents, said a plaintiff would only need to focus on the exemption or issue relevant to their particular case.

“Even if the Court decides to do something different from the 2nd Circuit, you know, we think the rule should be that they have to plead the unreasonable fees,” she said. “And here, you know, they just didn’t.”

Rising litigation costs may make employers more reluctant to provide benefit packages, leaving employees in a position where they may be unable to afford to retire, Camp said.

“Both the defense side and the plaintiff side want benefit plans to be successful,” she added. “And if you can have an employer be sued simply because he has a service provider agreement, that’s going to be a problem, and people are going to be more reluctant to offer plans.”

Bill targeting trans student athletes faces uncertain Senate fate

WASHINGTON — The House of Representatives passed a bill Tuesday banning transgender students from federally funded school and university sports, but its prospects in the Senate appeared dim.

The Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025 would amend Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 by recognizing only sex assigned at birth when determining eligibility for participation in women’s sports. 

Title IX is the federal civil rights law that prohibits gender discrimination in “any education program or activity” receiving federal assistance.

No Democratic senator has publicly expressed support for the bill. For it to pass, seven Democrats would have to join all Republicans.

The Senate stalled on a similar 2023 bill that passed the House along partisan lines.

In the House, two Democrats joined Republicans to pass the bill 218-206. The bill marked the latest in a years-long series of conservative attacks on transgender rights.

The legislation would give the federal government authority to prohibit trans girls and women from playing on girls’ and women’s athletic teams. Currently, states decide and more than half ban trans girls and women from playing on girls’ and women’s athletic teams that benefit from public funding.

“We know from Scripture, and from nature, that men are men and women are women, and men cannot become women,” Speaker Johnson said in a press conference following the vote.

Major medical associations differentiate gender from the sex assigned at birth. They support that an individual’s gender is determined based on how an individual identifies themselves.

However, Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) introduced the bill Jan. 3, saying on the House floor Tuesday that it restores the “integrity of women’s sports” and aligns with both biblical and biological understandings of gender.

“Our culture is subject to the perverse lie that men can be women or women can be men,” he said. “The distinction is clear, and this has been promulgated by those who seek to dismantle core society.”

The bill directs the comptroller general to launch a study into the “benefits to women or girls of participating in single sex sports that would be lost by allowing males to participate.”

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said the bill would open the floodgates to allowing children to be exploited due to unclear guidelines on how schools would determine who qualifies for girls and women’s teams. 

“The majority right now says there’s no place in this bill that says it opens up for genital examinations,” she said on the House floor. “Well, here’s the thing. There’s no enforcement mechanism in this bill, and when there is no enforcement mechanism, you open the door to every enforcement mechanism.”

Congressional Equality Caucus Chair Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.) said in a statement that Republicans prioritized their “obsession with attacking trans people” over grocery prices and school funding.

“It’s shameful that one of the first bills to pass the House this Congress limits transgender girls’ ability to be a part of their school’s community, prevents kids from playing with their friends and could force any girl to answer invasive personal questions about their bodies and face humiliating physical inspections to ‘prove’ that they’re a girl,” Takano said.

Health & Science

Photo Gallery: Senators grill RFK Jr. about “safety” in vaccines, mifepristone, and more

WASHINGTON — Senators questioned Robert Kennedy Jr. on vaccines, abortion, obesity and more on Thursday during the second day of his confirmation hearings to lead the Department of Health and Human Services. 

Kennedy’s body language communicated greater ease than Wednesday’s hearing. He sat forward in his seat, his hands clasped on the desk. His gestures, too, were larger. As senators asked questions, Kennedy alternated between dodging and addressing their concerns. Several times, the committee chair banged the gavel, marking the end of each senator’s five minutes to question Kennedy. 

Democrats and several Republicans scrutinized Kennedy’s views, with senators from both parties referencing research documenting the efficacy of various vaccines and medications. They questioned Kennedy’s past allegations about a link between autism and vaccines. One senator also cited studies on the safety of mifepristone, a drug often used in medical abortions.


One point of contention was what it takes for a drug to be considered safe, and whether Kennedy would retract his past comments casting doubt on the safety of certain vaccines and medications. Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Sen. Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) and several more senators all asked variations of that question — each focused on different topics. 

“If we were to talk about peer-reviewed, replicable studies of a medication, would you say that you needed 10 trusted studies to get the same conclusion? Fifteen? Twenty trusted studies?” Baldwin asked. “What’s your number?”

Kennedy responded, “it completely depends on the kind of study you’re talking about.” Then, he added that on mifepristone, Trump has not chosen a policy, and he would implement that policy. 

Many of Kennedy’s other statements were similar. He defended his previous statements, said he would evaluate the scientific evidence and stuck to that statement when senators cited specific scientific evidence.

Sen. Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) asked Kennedy to elaborate on a 2021 comment about how Black people should have different vaccine schedules than white people because their immune systems are “better than ours.” 

At the hearing, Kennedy defended his earlier comments, saying that there was a series of studies which showed “differences in reactions to different products by different races.”  

Alsobrooks shot back: “Your voice would be a voice that parents would listen to. That is so dangerous. I will be voting against your nomination because your views are dangerous to our state and to our country.” Several people in the hearing room began clapping. 

Three hours later, Kennedy’s confirmation hearing ended. 

“Thank you, Bobby!” several people shouted from the crowd as Kennedy shook hands with various senators before leaving the room. A group of people wearing lab coats in the back row watched silently.

Watch: Past comments on vaccines and abortion dominate RFK Jr. confirmation hearing

WASHINGTON – Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services, appeared before the Senate Committee on Finance on Wednesday. 

Kennedy’s previous comments on the efficacy of vaccines raised concern from Senate Democrats, and their questioning focused on this topic.

Watch the video report here:

Latest in Environment

Climate change activist groups demand action from Biden before term ends

WASHINGTON – Around 300 people gathered to demand climate action from the Biden administration outside the Environmental Protection Agency headquarters on Sunday, according to estimates from organizers.

Protesters called on President Joe Biden to protect public lands, cancel oil and gas projects and use all unspent money from the Inflation Reduction and Bipartisan Infrastructure Acts to invest in the climate.

Protesters came from the Washington DC metro area, New York and Pennsylvania to urge Biden to take action in his final 60 days of power before President-elect Donald Trump takes office in January.

A coalition of activist groups organized the rally, drawing hundreds of protesters to the Federal Triangle metro station. (Emma Richman/MNS)


“We cannot imagine trying to sleep any night during the Trump administration if we haven’t done everything we can first,” said Saul Levin, political and campaigns director for Green New Deal Network.

2024 has been the hottest year on record with the global average temperature reaching 1.54 degrees Celsius over pre-industrial levels, according to the World Meteorological Organization. This temporarily exceeds the Paris Agreement 1.5-degree temperature rise limit.

Trump is expected to take office in January, appointing former New York Rep. Lee Zeldin to head the Environmental Protection Agency. Together, the administration is expected to roll back the more progressive climate policies under Biden.

Levin organized the rally with over 30 climate change activist groups. He said it was the launching point for a campaign over the next 60 days to demand Democrats do as much as possible for the climate before Trump takes office.

Some protesters also held signs urging Senate Democrats to confirm more judges that would uphold environmental laws to safeguard against the Trump administration.

Jason Rylander, legal director for the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute, said there are limits to what the Trump administration can reverse. Rylander, who attended Sunday’s rally, added that the legal system is an important wall of defense.

“We will stand up with our partners and take the Trump administration to court at every turn if they’re undoing environmental protections,” Rylander said.

Several speakers addressed the rally, telling personal stories and outlining demands. The crowd cheered and chanted for climate action. Organizers led the rally in chants saying “every day counts” and “YOLO Joe.”

Protests held signs that said “60 days,” the amount of time Biden has left in office to take action on climate change. (Emma Richman/MNS)


Some protesters held signs urging Biden to pardon environmental activists. Others advocated for Biden to stop new liquified natural gas projects. Student activists led the crowd in song, and protesters of all ages attended.

Keanu Arpels-Josiah, climate organizer and first-year student at Swarthmore College, said he’s been involved in climate change activism since high school. An organizer with Fridays for Future NYC, Arpels-Josiah came to Sunday’s rally with a group of students from Philadelphia and said around 30 others came on a bus from New York.

Arpels-Josiah gave a speech at the rally and led the crowd in song alongside fellow student organizers. He urged Biden to fulfill his promises to take progressive climate action to safeguard the Earth for future generations.

“We can’t have a transition of just resignation,” Arpels-Josiah said. “We must have a transition of action and setting the groundwork to protect our democracy, protect our future, protect our rights, protect climate action.”

Congress presses Coast Guard on Arctic icebreaker shortfalls amid growing international competition

WASHINGTON — Transportation committee ranking member Richard Larsen (D-Wash.), questioned Coast Guard leadership on the U.S. ability to ice break in the Arctic Circle compared to competitors Russia and China after the Government Accountability Office released a scathing report about the operations.

The U.S. Coast Guard is tasked with managing American responsibilities in the Arctic through its presence in Alaska.  This team’s primary aim is icebreaking recapitalization, which involves regulating the quantity of and patrolling ice in the Arctic Circle. 

Despite this, the American fleet has only two ships capable of breaking heavy ice in the Arctic. Russia has 55 vessels and China, which does not have an Arctic coast, has four.

Rep. John Garamendi (D-Calif.), appeared frustrated about the timeline for new ships still being many years away. He asked the panel whether the U.S. is threatened by our lack of ships.

“We have a national security threat now,” Coast Guard Vice Admiral Peter Gautier said. “We need eight to nine ships as soon as possible, but it’s going to take a long time to build them.”

In recent years, this task has become more difficult, with longer and colder winters affecting much of the northern hemisphere. Alaska and, by extension, the Arctic Circle are valuable to United States national security, serving as the closest domestic military port to Russia.

Chairman Daniel Webster said the U.S. needs to catch up in our need for more icebreaking ships. 

“It is well beyond time to carry out our mission with new ships,” Webster said. “Nearly a year has passed [since Congress first inquired] and we don’t have a plan.”

Vice Admiral Thomas Allan Jr. emphasized that the Coast Guard must receive support from the Navy in this process, as these new ships will be the Coast Guard’s first icebreakers in more than fifty years.

“We do not have enough to complete ship one,” Allan said. “The Coast Guard is a capital intensive operation, and we fall further and further behind the Department of Defense each year.” 

Larsen, whose district features the third largest domestic port with significant shipbuilding facilities, echoed this sentiment and insisted that “our presence in the Arctic equals our sovereignty.”

Heather MacLeod, who authored the GAO report and directs the Homeland Security and Justice team, testified before the subcommittee. 

“The Coast Guard has done a good job at assessing risk in the region,” MacLeod said. “But its reliance on an aging fleet has hindered the service’s ability.”

MacLeod said the program to build new ships has experienced design challenges as it does not have its own facility. The Coast Guard leases its hangar space in Alaska.

Gautier, who has served in the Coast Guard for 37 years, said the committee must consider providing more funds to Arctic operations to see successful reinvestment rather than just focusing on vessels.

“The Coast Guard is more valuable today than ever before,” Gautier said. “We promote a peaceful, stable and cooperative Arctic in this unique and challenging maritime environment.”

Allan said the first of these ships will be approved to begin production before the end of the year.

Latest in National Security

GOP bill attempts to gradually privatize VA care

WASHINGTON — As their first move in the new presidential administration, Republican top brass on the Senate and House Veterans’ Affairs Committees introduced a bill last week loosening the threshold for veterans to access private care.

On paper, the Veterans’ ACCESS Act appears to show signs of the conservative policy blueprint Project 2025, which President Donald Trump has recently aligned himself with in his wave of executive orders. The 900-page report centers on the downsizing of multiple federal agencies, including policy suggestions that would impact the VA.

“There does seem an interest in really removing barriers to private sector care as part of that,” said Carrie Farmer, co-director of the RAND Epstein Family Veterans Policy Research Institute. “Whether or not that becomes a policy priority for the administration, I think we’ll need to wait and see.”

Notably, the bill may offer a privy window into the GOP’s desire to steer funds and resources away from federal veteran care to the private sector. 

But the ongoing struggle is nothing new.

Over the years, the VA agency has become a political hot button over complaints of long wait times, inadequate mental health care services and staffing shortages. Indeed, Republicans have had ample fodder to warrant overhauling the VA’s $300 billion budget.

In 2018, the Trump administration passed the Mission Act that codified the Community Care Network, enabling veterans to access services outside of federal care providers. 

Each year, more and more veterans have relied on the program. Today, the Community Care program delivers health care to over 2.8 million veterans.

At first glance, the ACCESS Act appears to expand on approaches taken with the Mission Act. Key provisions from the bill include restructuring veterans’ eligibility requirements for community care and instituting education programs and mental health treatment programs for veterans.

One provision of the ACCESS Act provides veterans the choice to seek in-person community care, despite telehealth treatment, a common fallback for veterans who live in remote areas, already being an option.

Many Republicans from rural states have railed against the VA’s offering of fewer in-person options there — even when the number of private options remains limited. 

A caveat of the bill, however, seems to lie in the launching of a new pilot program.

Per Section 302, the bill will direct a three-year pilot program to allow enrolled veterans to access private mental health treatment and substance use services through the community care network — without requiring a referral or preauthorization. Participants would be outside of the VA’s care jurisdiction for those care options.

The pilot, the bill says, is based on TRICARE Prime. Unlike VA Care, TRICARE Prime mainly deals with active duty service members and their families and is managed by the Department of Defense.

Experts suggest that this provision could portend the possibility of a moot VA.

“It is changing the VA primarily into an insurance carrier and paying for care that does not have to be authorized or pre-authorized by the VA,” said Russell Lemle, a senior policy advisor for the Veterans Healthcare Policy Institute.

At a Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee meeting in January, Republican lawmakers touted the new bill as a blanket solution for the VA.

“The VA health care system is an invaluable resource for veterans, but it will only remain so if it stops failing those who need it the most,” said Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), the Senate Veterans’ Affair Committee chairman.

Aside from the ACCESS Act, Republicans have offered little foresight into their plans for the VA. Doug Collins, Trump’s recently confirmed Secretary of Veterans Affairs, rejected any efforts to privatize the VA during his confirmation hearing. 

“I believe you can have both, you can have a strong VA as it currently exists and you can have the community care aspect,” Collins said.

Some of Collins’ other priorities, he told senators, were shedding department staff and bringing employees back to work in the office.

On Monday, the VA announced its return to in-person work policy, following Trump’s presidential memorandum. Given Collins’ inexperience in working in the VA, it is still unclear what his policies might entail under the new administration.

While Republicans have historically chipped away at the VA, Democrats have remained steadfast in their approach: the VA and private sector must work together.

“Wait times for community care might sometimes be longer in some instances,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). “The two systems have to be complementary, not competitive.”

Chinese influence on American college campuses concerns lawmakers despite decreasing numbers of Chinese students

WASHINGTON –  The Senate Foreign Relations Committee met on Thursday to discuss China’s influence at home and abroad with committee Chairman James Risch (R-Idaho) calling the country, “the greatest, long-term threat to the United States.”

Both lawmakers and experts raised concerns about the U.S. government’s negligence and failure to keep pace with China politically, economically and militarily. 

One specific topic of concern was China’s influence in American colleges and universities, with around 290,000 Chinese students studying in the U.S. in 2023, according to the Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange. 

“Colleges and universities are a really target-rich place for the Chinese. They show up with money, and, as pointed out here, colleges and universities respond to money,” said Risch.  

Jeffrey Stoff, founder of the Center for Research Security and Integrity said that universities have financial incentives and operations that are at odds with U.S. national and economic interests. According to his testimony, the primary goal of academia is “attracting sustaining revenue sources from anywhere and anyone,” which has enabled China to exploit the open systems of U.S. research institutions.

However, Joshua Kurlantzick, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, told the Medill News Service that is not the case. “I don’t think universities are accepting anyone from anywhere. Each university has certain standards of who they’ll accept, whether Americans or non-Americans.” he said.

Sarah Spreitzer, Vice President and Chief of Staff for Government Relations at the American Council for Education said she would “strongly disagree with the idea that [American institutions] are only in search of revenue.” She said institutions of higher education have been engaging with policymakers and federal security agencies to better understand these threats. 

“I think higher education is very aware of some of these issues. We continue to work with our policymakers to balance those national security concerns while also allowing qualified, interested international students come to the United States to study at our institutions,” she said. 

During the hearing, Risch said all Chinese students are “agent[s] of the Chinese Communist Party” because they return to China upon graduation. In fact, many students return to China because their student visa status requires them to leave the U.S. 

“Once they finish their program of study, they only have a set number of days that they can remain in the U.S. before they’re required to return to their home country,” Spreitzer said. 

Factors such as consular and visa barriers, rising U.S. crime statistics and a feeling of unwantedness in the U.S. have contributed to a decrease in the number of Chinese students in the U.S by more than 20 percent since 2019, according to the Washington Post. 

Spreitzer said countries like Australia and Canada may provide alternatives with better bridges between getting a student visa and working after graduation. 

Dr. Melanie Hart, Senior Director of the Global China Hub at the Atlantic Council said keeping the “student pipeline open” is in U.S. national interest and the government should support American students studying in China to “fill gaps in needed U.S. government China expertise.” 

“We need a scalpel for this, not a sledgehammer,” she said.

Kurlantzick saw an additional benefit. “There are pros and cons of having Chinese students but a pro would be they get to see the U.S. for themselves and not how the CCP portrays it,” he said. 

Dartmouth College Associate Professor Dr. Jennifer Lind further cautioned that U.S. policymakers should ensure that their responses to China uphold U.S. values, as she highlighted the millions of Chinese American citizens who are negatively impacted. 

“As we get frustrated that an authoritarian society is exploiting our free one, while we protect ourselves against Chinese influence operations in the ways recommended here, we must also honor our own values,” she said. “As we formulate our responses to Chinese malign influence operations, U.S. leaders should be thinking not only about this negotiation with Beijing, but also about whether our responses uphold our own values.” 

Latest in Living

Watch: The 17th Annual Lincoln Oratory Festival Brings History to Life

WASHINGTON — The 17th Annual Lincoln Oratory Festival hosted 293 local elementary and middle school students at Ford’s Theatre, the site of the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. 

The event showcased third-grade through eighth-grade students who performed historical speeches, most of which were written by Lincoln himself.


Watch the video report here:

Watch: Housing secretary nominee testifies at Senate hearing

WASHINGTON –– Eric Scott Turner, Trump’s pick for the Secretary of Housing, Development and Urban Development is headed to a full Senate vote after being narrowly approved in committee.

He is the first nominee to be approved without an FBI background check, to the dismay of democrats like Sen.Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).

Watch the video report here:

 

Latest Business

Commerce Nominee Lutnick defends Trump tariffs, promises to divest from business interests

WASHINGTON – Howard Lutnick, billionaire CEO and co-chair of the Trump/Vance transition team, vowed to use his position as commerce secretary to implement the new administration’s tariff policies in a confirmation hearing Wednesday. 

Vice President JD Vance introduced the nominee, stating, “This is a person who on a world stage will say more and do more and convince businesses that America is back, that America is growing and thriving.”

If confirmed, Lutnick will lead an agency that has an enormous influence on business, science, and technology promotion. He is one of more than a dozen billionaires tapped by President Donald Trump to serve on his cabinet. Senators on both sides of the aisle made clear their discomfort with his ties to Wall Street.  

For 42 years, Lutnick has worked at Cantor Fitzgerald, rising through the ranks to become the CEO and amass a personal fortune. The company was located in the World Trade Center and lost 658 employees, including Lutnick’s younger brother, on Sept. 11, 2001. 

Senators pressed Lutnick about whether he would be able to truly separate from his business. 

When Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) probed him on ethics concerns, Lutnick committed to divesting within 90 days of his confirmation and to cooperate with the ethics agreement. 

“So my plan is to only serve the American people. So I will divest and I will sell all of my interests, all of my business interests, all of my assets, everywhere,” Lutnick said. 

As the head of the Commerce Department, Lutnick would oversee the implementation of President Trump’s economic and trade agenda, including enforcing the tariff plan that Trump campaigned on. During the hearing, Lutnick expressed a preference for “across the board” tariffs to maintain fairness in international trade. 

Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) raised questions about how Trump’s tariff plan would impact Michigan, a center of American manufacturing. U.S. companies would have to pay higher prices for parts used in their products and could face hostile market conditions abroad. 

Lutnick defended Trump’s tariffs. 

“I think a thoughtful tariff policy that drives domestic manufacturing is fundamental to American workers, especially the workers of Michigan,” Lutnick stated. 

Under questioning, Lutnick said he had “no interest” in dividing up the agencies within National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which is part of the Commerce Department. Project 2025, a conservative blueprint for Trump’s second term, called for a split. NOAA oversees the National Weather Service and manages American fisheries. 

Lutnick had promoted cryptocurrency, specifically Tether, a type of cryptocurrency.

Lutnick fielded questions from Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) on his connection to Tether, stating that he personally does not own Tether, and that his company Cantor Fitzgerald had no equity in Tether other than 1:1 backing. 

After the hearing, Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), said he was satisfied with Lutnick’s answers, especially on the issue of cryptocurrency. 

“I was concerned about, you know, how his various things such as Tether have been shown to facilitate corrupt activities. And he was pretty direct that we just have to build in and use AI to allow government to be able to rapidly find out not only where that money went, but how it was used, who they gave it to, and begin to follow that whole chain of information,” Hickenlooper said.

Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), however, expressed concern over Lutnick’s performance and his willingness to uphold the law while working under President Donald Trump. 

“Well, he wouldn’t answer my question about opposing an illegal or unconstitutional order from Mr. Trump, and that’s deeply troubling. He says that Mr. Trump would never give an unlawful order, which we know he just did last week.”

Trump meme coin presents volatile investment alongside ethics concerns

Friday night Ogle’s head pounded, so much so that he swore off working for the rest of the night. Then, a friend messaged him that President Donald Trump just launched a cryptocurrency. He decided to invest big in the coin and, ignoring his headache, stayed up until the early hours of the morning watching the coin surge.   

“I put probably 50% of my entire portfolio worth of cash into it,” said Ogle, a crypto security expert who uses an alias but refuses to give his name for safety reasons. “By the next day, I made more money than I’ve ever made in my life in one day.”

Like many other people, Ogle was drawn to Trump’s latest business venture, the crypto meme coin $TRUMP. He launched it three days before taking the highest office in the land.

“My NEW Official Trump Meme is HERE. It’s time to celebrate everything we stand for: WINNING!” Trump wrote on Truth Social a few hours after releasing the cryptocurrency. 

The meme coin’s market capitalization rose to over $14 billion by Sunday as many Americans rushed to buy it as an investment opportunity or to show support for the incoming president. However, the coin became the center of a national debate over the ethics of Trump launching a coin right before he took office. 

The coin’s price started at less than $10 and quickly surged above $70 early Sunday morning. The price held relatively steady from Tuesday to Thursday, moving up and down in the $35-45 range. As of Thursday morning, the coin was valued at approximately $38 and has a market capitalization of $7.68 billion.

This was not Trump’s first time actively participating in the crypto universe. Trump and his family members, including his youngest son Barron, backed World Liberty Financial, a decentralized finance project. A presale for the token launched on Oct. 15, 2024, and investors cannot trade it yet. 

Ogle also acted as an adviser for World Liberty Financial and he noted the token had not gotten much traction until $TRUMP skyrocketed last week.

Ogle said that he decided to invest in $TRUMP, not as a mode of political support but as an investment opportunity. 

“I couldn’t care less about the political statement. I’m certainly not supporting Trump via purchasing a meme coin,” he said

He said that among the crypto community, there were initially concerns that Trump’s new token would be a cash grab scheme; however, worries subsided after Trump kept several promises he made to crypto fanatics, including pardoning Ross Ulbricht. Ulbricht had been serving a life sentence for crimes including distributing narcotics. Ulbricht’s website accepted bitcoin to pay for drugs.

The release of the coin less than 72 hours before Trump’s inauguration sparked criticism about the political ethics of the business. 

Aaron Scherb, senior director for legislative affairs at Common Cause, a group whose mission is “holding public officials accountable,” expressed concern over the lack of uniform regulation around the cryptocurrency industry and said the Trump coin was no exception. 

“The cryptocurrency industry, in general, has been a wild west with next to no accountability and an anything-goes approach,” Scherb said. 

He noted that even if there was nothing outright illegal about Trump’s coin, it certainly “looks and smells bad” and seemed like an attempt to line his own pockets. 

Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) said the Trump coin was released as a novelty, not as a tool for investment. 

“It was, as I understand, released for its entertainment value. … To the extent that that was made clear to people who would purchase it, I’m OK with it. If it had been released as an investment vehicle, I might feel differently,” Lummis said. 

Lummis had been a vocal advocate for the growth of cryptocurrency in the U.S. This Tuesday, she met with Eric Trump to discuss the Federal government building a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.  

When asked about whether she would support a crypto reserve for another type of coin, including $TRUMP, Lummis affirmed it should only be Bitcoin. 

“Bitcoin is unlike any other digital asset. It doesn’t have a founders group, and it’s scarce, and always will be. So I think we should limit it to Bitcoin,” she said.

SOTU: Health Care

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Congress should approve his plan to replace Obamacare with a new health care program that would provide “affordable alternative” insurance options and criticized Democrats for trying to impose “a socialist takeover of our health care system.”

“A good life for American families requires the most affordable, innovative and high-quality health care system on earth,” Trump said in his third State of the Union address.

Trump said he has proposed health care plans that would be up to 60% cheaper than the Affordable Care Act plans. Both the White House and the Department of Health and Human Services did not respond when asked if a specific replacement plan has existed or ever will.

The president blamed Democrats for not providing the American people with the health care reforms he has promised.

“As we work to improve Americans’ health care, there are those who want to take away your health care, take away your doctor, and abolish private insurance entirely,” said Trump, referring to the Democrats.

Democrats stood up at this comment, pointed their fingers at Trump and shouted “YOU.”

Trump said 130 Democrats endorse legislation to impose a “socialist takeover” of the health care system by “taking away the private health insurance plans of 180 million.”

Democratic presidential candidates Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., are pushing for a “Medicare for All” plan that would end private health insurance while other candidates like former Vice President Joe Biden, Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., are pushing to expand on Obamacare.

“We will never let socialism destroy American health care,” Trump said.

Trump emphasized the administration’s efforts to protect patients with pre-existing conditions, to which Democrats threw up their hands and shook their heads in disagreement. Led by House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate and House Democrats brought more than 80 patients, doctors and health care advocates from across the country as guests to the speech.

“President Trump will speak to an audience filled with Americans who are suffering because of his broken promises on prescription drug costs and his all-out assault on Americans with preexisting conditions,” Pelosi said in a press release Tuesday morning.

The president also called upon Congress to pass legislation to lower prescription drug prices.

“Get a bill to my desk, and I will sign it into law without delay,” the president said.

Democrats responded to this by booing and holding up three fingers to represent H.R. 3, legislation proposed by the late Rep. Elijah E. Cummings that would require the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to negotiate certain drug prices. The bill has been on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s desk for over a month after being passed in the House.

Generic prescription drug prices dropped 1% in 2018, the first price drop in 45 years, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. Trump said it was the first time in 51 years. Brand-name drug prices, however, are still increasing.

Trump said the administration will continue to make health care more transparent by requiring hospitals to make their prices negotiated with insurers public and easily accessible online. He also pointed to the passage of administration-backed legislation called “Right to Try,” which allows terminally ill patients access to drugs not fully approved by the Food and Drug Administration if they feel they have tried all other options.

He also said he has launched new initiatives to improve care for Americans with kidney disease, Alzheimer’s and those struggling with mental health challenges, in addition to pursuing new cures for childhood cancer and AIDS.

The House Ways and Means Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday afternoon to further discuss Trump’s health care policies and overcoming pharmaceutical barriers in particular.

Trump Sticks By Wall in State of the Union Address

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump’s call for a wall to secure America’s southern border in his State of the Union address Tuesday night was no surprise to opponents.

Jennifer Johnson, the policy director at the Southern Border Communities Coalition, said Trump continually characterizes the southern border as a violent area.

“More of a reality check, these are families and children seeking protection, fleeing spiraling violence and poverty,” she said.

Chris Montoya, who served as a Customs and Border Protection agent for 21 years, said that “crime rates are pretty low in border cities. Being a border patrol agent is one of the safest law enforcement jobs. All those things together means a safe border.”

Rep.  Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y., invited as his guest a mother who had been separated from her children at the border.

Other Democrats brought undocumented immigrants as their guests, including Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., Rep. Jimmy Gomez, D-Calif., and Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-N.J.

Rep. Sheila Jackson, D-Texas, was enthusiastic about their attendance at the address. “Their presence here today is representative of the big tent that America is,” she said.

In his address, Trump attributed what he called at crisis at the border to America’s “reduced jobs, lower wages, overburdened schools, and hospitals that are so crowded you can’t get in.” He referenced San Diego and El Paso as being cities that were once violent, and now safe with the addition of physical barriers.

Trump also mentioned the prevalence of MS-13 within the country. “They almost all come through our Southern border,” he said.

Montoya said MS-13 members do enter through the southern border on rare occasions, but it is uncommon for CBP agents to make an arrest.

Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin is the ranking member on the Senate Subcommittee for Border Security and Immigration. He said nothing changed in Trump’s rhetoric. “If we’re waiting on him, we’re not going to get this solved,” he said.

Washingtonians alternately protest, celebrate the State of the Union

WASHINGTON – DC-area residents had very different reactions to President Donald Trump’s second State of the Union address Tuesday night. But whether they celebrated or denounced the event, emotions were strong.

Around 40-50 people gathered at each of two intersections near the Capitol ahead of the address  — far fewer than the 400 people who protested last year, according to Resist DC, the community action group that organized both years’ protests.

People lined the sidewalks along the streets that President Donald Trump, Vice President Mike Pence and other Trump cabinet members’ motorcades were expected pass by. They held homemade signs lit with string lights so they would be visible to government officials in their cars and chanted anti-Trump messages to music and drums.

Eileen Minarick, 70, said she was protesting simply “because the state of our union is terrible.”

Members of Herndon-Reston Indivisible, a group created to resist President Trump's policies and elect Democrats to office, held lit-up letters spelling “Fraud” and “Yuge Liar.” (Ester Wells/MNS)40-50 protestors were stationed at each of two points along 3rd Street NW in Washington, D.C. (Ester Wells/MNS)Protestors waved Russian flags as they waited along the sidewalk. (Ester Wells/MNS)A protestor held a lit-up sign as he shouted the words. (Ester Wells/MNS)Eileen Minarick, 70, said, “I don’t feel I’m protesting Trump. I’m protesting the policies of his administration, which are inhuman.” (Ester Wells/MNS)(Ester Wells/MNS)Police cars and officers patrolled the streets surrounding the Capitol, many of which were blocked off to both vehicles and pedestrians. (Ester Wells/MNS)Patrons don pink stickers and resistance apparel as they listen to activist speakers and wait for President Trump's State of the Union address to begin  (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Sitting in front of the projector, a stray star is caught on actor Danny Glover's face as he prepares to educate attendees about the conflict in Latin America. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Co-founder of CODEPINK, Madea Benjamin addresses the crowd as other speakers converse with audience members. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)The classic pairing of wine and board games is at every table, except with a twist. In order to ‘survive the night’ patrons mark a square every time President Trump utters a common saying. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Violence against women must end, said Chad Smith, a trainer with nonprofit organization Men Can Stop Rape. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)All eyes are trained on the screen as Trump enters the House Chamber for the State of the Union address. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Grinning, a man in a Make America Great Again hat listens as President Donald Trump announced “I will get it built” in reference to a southern border wall at a local Young Republicans watch party. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)A sign welcomes members of the DC Young Republicans and Arlington Falls Church Young Republicans. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Members of Republican organizations gather around as President Trump continues past expected time in his State of the Union speech. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)The scene is more mellow downstairs, where a few recluse bar patrons chat with each other as the television screens broadcast in synchrony. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)

Elsewhere in the city, local bar patrons gathered to drink beer, compete in presidential bingo and watch the State of the Union.

Grassroots activist group CODEPINK hosted a number of guest speakers, including actor Danny Glover, for a lively discussion before the main event. Topics ranged from the Bolivarian revolution to ending domestic violence.

Anita Jenkins, spokeswoman for Stand Up for Democracy, riled the crowd with a call to establish the District of Columbia the 51st state in the United States.

“The people of D.C. have no representation… We have nobody to speak for us,” she said. Modifying the words of America’s early founders, she said, “Taxation without representation is a rip-off.”

As President Trump appeared on the projector, shouts of disapproval rose from the bar patrons. The State of the Union 2019 had begun and the energy was energetic in its moroseness.

Across town, the atmosphere was also charged. Members of DC Young Republicans and Arlington Falls Church Young Republicans filled a restaurant for a celebratory viewing party.

“In the past, most of the people in this room voted for a wall… but the proper wall never got built,” said Donald Trump. He paused and then said, “I’ll get it built.” Hoots and hollers erupted in the bar and two girls were seen smiling and hugging each other.

Though Trump stressed unity in his national address, DC-area residents remained divided in their reactions.

2020 Candidates Alternate Cheers, Hisses to Trump Wall, Immigration Proposals during State of Union

WASHINGTON – Several Democratic 2020 presidential candidates expressed their displeasure with many of President Donald Trump’s policies during the State of the Union address Tuesday.

Sens. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., could be seen shaking their heads when Trump mentioned controversial topics such as his commitment to building a border wall and the dangers of migrant caravans heading to the U.S. southern border.

Harris, who announced her candidacy on Jan. 21, shook her head and visibly mouthed, “They’re not,” as Trump said, “Large, organized caravans are on the march to the United States.”

In a Facebook Live address before the State of the Union, Harris told viewers, “It’s a moment for a president to rise above politics and unite the country with a vision that includes all Americans, not just the ones who may have voted for them. It’s a moment to bring us together.”

Early in the address, Harris was often reluctant to give Trump a standing ovation, asking her colleagues, “Really?” as they cheered the president’s comments about space exploration.

The candidates and their Democratic colleagues booed and hissed as Trump labeled the numerous investigations into his campaign finance and relationship with Russia “ridiculous partisan investigations.”

“If there is going to be peace and legislation, there cannot be war and investigation,” he said. “It just doesn’t work that way!”

Democrats cheered later as Trump mentioned that women have filled 58 percent of new jobs in the past year. New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who has formed a presidential exploratory committee, pointed at the newly elected House Democrats, who stood up and chanted, “USA, USA.”

“I think he didn’t realize that all the female jobs he created were for [congresswomen],” Gillibrand said after the speech.

The Democratic candidates stood and applauded with everyone in the chamber when Trump recognized World War II veterans, a SWAT team member and a childhood cancer survivor.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., sat stoically as Trump denounced socialism. Sanders, who calls himself a democratic socialist, is widely considered likely e to enter the presidential race. Unlike Sanders, Gillibrand and Harris stood and applauded as Trump said, “America will never be a socialist country.”

TRUMP STRIKES CHORD WITH WOMEN, FALLS FLAT ON BIPARTISAN BORDER WALL PITCH

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump got one of his biggest rounds of applause during his State of the Union address Tuesday night when he noted that Congress now has a record-high number of elected women, but it wasn’t lost on the crowd that when the women rose to cheer they were mostly on the Democratic side of the aisle.

“Americans can be proud that we have more women in the workforce than ever before,” Trump said as the women lawmakers rose to clap and celebrate. He then advised them “Don’t sit. You’re going to like this.”

“Exactly one century after the Congress passed the constitutional amendment giving women the right to vote, we also have more women serving in the Congress than at any time before,” he said. There were 117 women elected to Congress in 2018.

Bipartisan chants of “USA! USA!” filled the chamber as both the Democrats and Republicans broke into uproarious applause. Many of the Democratic women wore white and donned pins that read “ERA YES,” in a nod to the women of the suffragette movement.

Trump called his list of priorities “the agenda of the American people” in his second State of the Union address Tuesday, which was delayed a week because of the 35-day government shutdown, which didn’t end until the previous Friday. The address was the first the president has delivered before the new Democratic majority in the House.

The president remained on-script for the duration of the 84-minute speech and touted his administration’s achievements from the past two years. He also laid out several legislative priorities going forward, including a “smart, strategic, see-through steel barrier,” an infrastructure bill and the eradication of HIV and AIDS.

Rep. French Hill, R-Ark., was glad that health care was a topic in the speech, while Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., described the speech as “terrific.”

“We haven’t gotten that right when it comes to protection our citizens with pre-existing conditions, correcting all the problems and costs associated with the ACA,” French said. “I like that he kept an emphasis on that while also tackling the prescription drug process.”

For Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., laying out these broad initiatives wasn’t enough.

“I wrote down a number of initiatives — defense spending, cancer research, transportation, infrastructure — and never heard anything of how we’re going to pay for them,” he said.

The president also pushed his plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria and to reduce drastically the number of troops in Afghanistan.

Among Democrats, reactions were mixed as Trump highlighted his achievements. When Trump lauded the U.S. increase in gas and oil production, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., who has championed a Green New Deal to address accelerating climate change, remained seated.

Many Democrats applauded Trump’s push for a new infrastructure bill and decision to withdraw troops from Syria and Afghanistan.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who sat behind Trump with Vice President Mike Pence, was clearly following a printed version of the speech. She applauded when Trump mentioned criminal justice reform and bipartisan efforts on lowering drug costs and furthering women’s rights.

After praising a recent bipartisan effort to secure criminal justice reform, Trump shifted to a project he said would require the same bipartisan effort: a southern border wall.

“Simply put, walls work and walls save lives,” he said. “So let’s work together, compromise and reach a deal that will truly make America safe.”

However, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was not encouraged by the president’s attempt to strike a bipartisan tone.

“I just don’t think he is to be trusted,” she said. “This is not a president who is working for the middle class of this country.”

Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., said that while parts of Trump’s speech were good, he was too combative at times.

“There should have been more emphasis on the fact that the government was shut down and we all need to work together to bring it back,” he said. “Blaming the Democrats is not going to keep the government open.”

Freshmen members of Congress excited, disappointed at their first State of the Union address

WASHINGTON — Before attending his first State of the Union address, Rep. Jefferson Van Drew, D-N.J., felt a sense of excitement and joy, but also feared the president might once again fan partisan flames by rehashing controversial issues.

“I hope that right now, he doesn’t talk about closing the government again. I hope he doesn’t talk right now about declaring a national emergency. I would so much rather see that we try to work together and get something done. That requires flexibility on Democrats side as well. Both sides have to do this,” said Van Drew.

Partisanship is the reason the approval rating for Congress is so low, but issues like border security, and infrastructure deserve cooperation between the two parties, said Van Drew.

“Rather than just argue and disagree and investigative and be hurtful on both sides, maybe we can actually get something get done.”

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Chris Pappas, D-N.H.

Although having been full-fledged members of Congress for a little over a month, the freshmen class of senators and representatives still retains a “sense of awe” about the State of the Union address, said Rep. Chris Pappas, D-N.H. Pappas said he hoped Trump would strike a conciliatory tone with Democrats, allowing lawmakers to avoid a second government shutdown.

Pappas brought a transgender military veteran from his home state to hear the president as a symbol of his hope that Trump’s transgender military service ban will be lifted.

“That doesn’t make us any safer and in fact plays politics with the military,” he said.

In addition to passing social justice reform, Pappas said he would like Trump to speak about the opioid crisis, prescription drug costs and infrastructure — and Trump did.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Sean Casten, D-Ill.

In Illinois Rep. Sean Casten’s dreams, Trump’s State of the Union address would make climate change a priority, but said his expectations were low. Trump did not in fact mention the environment.

“Truth is what I hope he doesn’t say is what I fear he will say,” Casten said, “which is that he’s going to threaten to shut down the government again if he doesn’t get a wall.”

Casten’s guest was Julie Caribeaux, the executive director of Family Shelter Service, which receives federal aid and provides support for victims of domestic abuse. He said domestic violence victims are some of the “primary victims” of Trump’s rhetoric.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Anthony Brindisi, D-N.Y.

Rep. Anthony Brindisi, D-NY, was hoping for a message of bipartisanship and unity, things that “the American people are calling for.” Trump did call on Congress to act together on many issues.

Brindisi’s top priorities this year are trying to find common ground with the Republicans on immigration reform, infrastructure and lowering prescription drug costs. On infrastructure, he said he specifically wanted to hear Trump’s ideas on investing in job training programs. Trump mentioned all the issues, but with little specificity except that he wants a border wall and enforcement to stop what he called “caravans of migrants” heading to the southern border.

“Those are things that I talked about during the campaign that many people back in upstate New York are calling for and those are things I hope he does say,” Brindisi said.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev.

Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev., said she gets excited every time she walks onto the House floor, and Tuesday was no exception. Although there were parts of the speech she did not agree with, namely Trump’s insistence on a border wall, Lee said she appreciated the call for bipartisanship.

Lowering prescription drug prices, investing in infrastructure and a comprehensive border control strategy — these are all components of his speech Lee said she could agree with.

“These are all ideas I can get behind and they work together to produce some results for American families,” she said.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Deb Halaand, D-N.M.

Rep. Deb Haaland, D-N.M., said she was dismayed about Trump’s urgency regarding funding for a border wall.

“I wasn’t surprised. Let’s put it that way about the president’s speech. I mean, of course, we don’t want a wall,” said Halland. “He instilled fear and everybody about the danger, you know, the danger that’s coming across the border.”

Haaland hopes to focus on promoting awareness about climate change and wished the President would be more receptive to the diverse issues and people around the country.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Chuy Garcia, D-Ill., said he enjoyed his first State of the Union in a historical sense, but wanted President Trump to address issues he feels are important, including raising the minimum wage and healthcare.

Rep. Jesus “Chuy” Garcia, D-Ill.

He said while the president did mention lowering prescription drug costs, there was another area of healthcare that was not noted, such as the millions who do not have healthcare at all.

“He wrapped himself around a lot of patriotism and recognition of your courageous battles and victories and but in the end, I think he failed to address important things more,” Garcia said.

 

 

Post-SOTU Interviews with Illinois Democratic Reps. Jan Schakowski and Cheri Bustos

Our Alex Lederman sat down with Illinois Democratic Reps. Jan Schakowski and Cheri Bustos after the State of the Union to hear their thoughts on President Obama’s address.

Schakowski — Evanston’s congresswoman since 1999 — said “(Obama)’s vision of what makes our country strong was so human and so true.”

Bustos said Obama is focused on the future — our children and grandchildren — and working together to solve the nation’s problems.

Medill on the Hill produces live State of the Union broadcast

WASHINGTON — It was the third day of reporting for the 21 students in Medill on the Hill. It also happened to be the day the president would deliver his final State of the Union address.

Months ago, buoyed by the excitement of the possibilities and the folly of youth, some of us came up with the idea of taking Medill on the Hill to a new level — producing live TV while also finding new ways of storytelling for the website and social media.

On State of the Union night, Jan. 12, the Washington web team led by Alex Duner and Celena Chong managed the flow of copy and constant web updates streaming in from reporters around Capitol Hill and elsewhere in D.C. There also was a constant stream of @medillonthehill tweets and snapchats as well as several Periscopes.

Tyler Kendall, Allyson Chiu and Shane McKeon were responsible for the main story, and Chiu said the experience was, “the highlight” of her journalism career.

“It was hectic, crazy and we were definitely all running on adrenaline by the end of the night,” she said.

Other reporters were assigned to stories on specific issues the president mentioned, or how local college students reacted to the speech. One even tweeted the speech in Spanish.

My task was to produce the Washington end of a live television broadcast.

Nine months ago Jesse Kirsch came back from 2015 Medill on the Hill with an idea for Carlin McCarthy, another producer with the Northwestern News Network, and me.

He said, with the optimism of a television anchor, that for the 2016 State of the Union we should produce a live broadcast with analysts at our home studio in Evanston and reporters in our D.C. bureau and on Capitol Hill. I said, with the skepticism of a television producer, that I thought he was crazy.

It took long nights, patience and a lot of support from the Medill faculty and staff, but we pulled it off.

Jesse opened the show in Evanston and before we knew it Isabella Gutierrez was doing a live hit from the Washington bureau. Then we were live in Statuary Hall with Noah Fromson, followed by a live report from graduate student Ryan Holmes on what to watch for just minutes before we streamed the live feed of President Barack Obama addressing a joint session of Congress for his final State of the Union.

We did a live interviews with Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin, wrote scripts while we counted down the seconds until they were read and gathered quotes from senators and members of Congress. Alex Lederman also provided quick-turn video interviews with two congresswomen.

Associate Producer Geordan Tilley, who interviewed Durbin, was nervous before the show, but she said she is proud of the Medill effort.

“I thought the show was some of our best work, Tilley said. “Especially considering how many firsts were involved, not the least of which was our first time going live.”

 

 

 

.

 

Medill Today | February 6, 2025