‘Don’t use us as pawns’: Federal workers bear brunt of government shutdown

Federal workers discuss the Trump administration’s mass layoffs and back pay threats.

Senate debates merit of Patent Eligibility Restoration Act

The bill would expand patent eligibility for innovations in sectors including medicine and software.

Senate weighs AI’s role in health care amid safety, regulation concerns

Lawmakers at the Senate HELP Committee hearing discussed how artificial intelligence could improve health care, support rural hospitals and protect children from harmful chatbot interactions, highlighting both opportunities and urgent safety concerns.

Lawmakers, experts propose solutions to health, security risks of foreign-manufactured drugs

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) called for tariffs on all foreign generic medicines on Oct. 8, 2025.

Senate hearing on Biden-era censorship shifts to debate on Trump administration threats, Kimmel suspension

“This hearing is a farce,” Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) said. “We are not focusing on the imminent threat to the First Amendment, the beating heart of democracy.”

Latest in Politics

Lawmaker proposes legislation to commemorate Oct. 7 while Trump’s 20-point peace plan raises concerns

WASHINGTON – On the second anniversary of the start of the Israel-Hamas war on Tuesday, Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) proposed bipartisan legislation that would award the Congressional Gold Medal to all hostages held by Hamas after the attack.

During a press conference outside the U.S. Capitol, the lawmaker also introduced a resolution that condemns Hamas and calls for their surrender and the release of the remaining hostages. The bipartisan October 7th Remembrance Education Act would also direct the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum to build a curriculum for students to learn about the events of Oct. 7 and how anti-semitism led to the attacks.   

“We will fight to honor their memories and so many others by molding our pain of that tragic day into action. And, ensuring American children know their heroism in the savagery of Hamas terrorists,” Rep. Gottheimer said.

The proposed legislation comes amidst negotiations over President Donald Trump’s 20-point peace plan that seeks to end the bloody conflict. Rep. Gottheimer said he supports the overall objective of the peace plan and urged Hamas to agree to it as well.

“I think the objectives are clear, I think Israel has accepted them, the President is behind them, many of us are supportive of that objective. Now, it’s up to Hamas to actually accept the plan,” Rep. Gottheimer said.

Yet, many pro-Palestinian advocates have expressed concerns with the peace plan.

On Oct. 4, advocacy groups and protesters came together to rally in Washington. One group that attended the rally was the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition. Ben Zinevich, the D.C. regional coordinator of the coalition, believes Trump’s peace plan will not actually benefit Palestinians. 

“Congress has shown, as a body, that it really is beholden to the Zionist project. I think that we’ve seen that over the last two years, there’s really not been a move to recognize what this is as a genocide and rather just hone in as if history began on October 7, 2023,” Zinevich said.

Protesters gather for the “Rise Up for Gaza” rally on Oct. 4. (Isabella Jacob/MNS)

Josh Ruebner, a professor at Georgetown University’s Justice and Peace Studies program, also has serious concerns about Trump’s 20-point peace plan.

“It denies Palestinian self-determination. Gaza will not be governed by Palestinians for the benefit of the Palestinian people, but under Trump’s 20-point plan, it will be governed by an international board of directors, ostensibly for the benefit of Trump,”  Ruebner said.

Furthermore, he is concerned that this plan will bring anything but peace.  

“It (the plan) doesn’t ensure any type of just and lasting peace, because it doesn’t go to the heart of any of the matters that divide Palestinians and Israelis…So this is not a recipe for peace, but a recipe for the ongoing subjugation of the Palestinian people,” Ruebner said.

He fears there will be ongoing violence given Israel’s past actions. He referenced the negotiations that took place in January between Israel and Hamas that would have resulted in the exchange of all Israeli captives in exchange for Palestinian captives and would have resulted in a permanent ceasefire. But in March of 2025, Israel broke the ceasefire due to Hamas refusing to accept the terms proposed by the U.S. 

“There’s absolutely no mechanism in place that would hold Israel accountable should it decide to violate the terms of the agreement again,” Ruebner said.

As of Oct. 8, Hamas and Israel are negotiating the terms of the peace plan in Egypt alongside U.S. and Qatari officials, according to the New York Times.

Bondi dodges Democratic questioning on Comey, Epstein

WASHINGTON — Attorney General Pam Bondi deflected numerous questions about Justice Department investigations into President Donald Trump’s political rivals while testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday. Her refrain?

“I am not going to discuss personal matters or pending litigation in my office.”

Rather than addressing questions regarding the alleged weaponization of her justice department, Bondi flipped the script, pointing to instances in which she claimed the Biden administration had politicized the department.

On Monday night, Republicans made public FBI documents that demonstrated how Special Counsel Jack Smith’s 2022 inquiry into the Jan. 6 insurrection had secretly gathered metadata on the contacts of eight Republican senators.

At the Tuesday hearing and in an X post, Senate Judiciary Chair Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) described the incident as “worse than Watergate.” Bondi called it an “unconstitutional abuse of government power.” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and others falsely claimed that agents had engaged in wiretapping.

Bondi also emphasized the perceived success of the Trump administration’s deployment of federal agents to U.S. cities and blamed Democrats for the continued shutdown. When pushed, she launched direct attacks on the committee’s Democratic senators.

“I wish you’d love Chicago as much as you hate President Trump,” she said to Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) when asked if the White House consulted the department on whether to deploy troops to Chicago.

The Justice Department has been under scrutiny for the recent indictment of former FBI director James Comey on charges of making a false statement and obstruction of a congressional proceeding in relation to testimony he gave before the Senate in 2020. Comey has maintained his innocence, saying he never knowingly gave false testimony before Congress.

Trump has long called for charges against Comey, whom he has attacked for the investigation into his campaign ties to Russia during the 2016 election.

This indictment itself came mere days after Trump made a direct call for the Justice Department to prosecute several of his political rivals: Comey, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Letitia James, the New York attorney general.

“Pam: I have reviewed over 30 statements and posts saying that, essentially, ‘same old story as last time, all talk, no action. Nothing is being done. What about Comey, Adam ‘Shifty’ Schiff, Leticia??? They’re all guilty as hell, but nothing is going to be done,’” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Critics say this direct pressure undermines the independence of the DOJ, whose prosecutorial decisions are expected to be insulated from political influence.

At the Tuesday hearing, several Judiciary Committee Democrats pointed to Trump’s post as evidence that the department was succumbing to the president’s influence.

“Far from ending weaponization of justice, I would submit, Madam Attorney General, that President Trump has embodied it,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.).

The fervor over Comey’s indictment has been compounded by the department’s handling of the Epstein files.

Since Trump took office in January, pressure has been mounting from his supporters and others within the Republican Party, who have called for more transparency around the investigations into Epstein, the late financier and convicted child sex offender.

On Tuesday, Bondi largely dodged questions about Epstein’s client list.

Still, committee Democrats continually expressed concern about the state of the Justice Department.

“What was once the Department of Justice, has become the department of revenge and corruption,” said Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii). “Rather than pursuing cases without fear or favor, this DOJ seeks to favor the president’s friends and instill fear in his alleged enemies.”

Latest in Education

Tribal Leaders: BIE Schools Face Billion-Dollar Repair Backlog, Unsafe Conditions

WASHINGTON — Power outages regularly disrupt school in Arizona’s White Mountain Apache Tribe, leading to spoiled food, limited access to technology and cold classrooms. School administrators sometimes heat buildings with kerosene. In some cases, they must close the school when carbon monoxide levels become too high.

“Our students need and deserve better, and I hope you will help us deliver on the tremendous promise these young people possess,” White Mountain Apache Tribal Chairman Kasey Velasquez told congressional leaders at a Feb. 12 oversight hearing.

During the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations hearing, tribal education leaders told congressional members that the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) schools face crumbling infrastructure, unsafe conditions and a massive backlog of deferred maintenance, while receiving less than half the per-student funding of other federally operated schools.

The 183 schools run by BIE have collectively accumulated more than $1 billion in overdue repairs as of September 2022, according to testimony shared by Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-Ariz.) during the hearing. Many maintenance requests have remained unaddressed for years.

Government inspectors recently observed a crumbling foundation and an inoperable boiler at separate schools in the same Arizona town, despite work orders dating back to 2008. About 1,000 orders placed in 2000 remained unaddressed over two decades later, including requests for exit signs, fire alarm systems and replacements for asbestos floor tiles.

“How can we expect BIE students to excel when their classrooms are crumbling around them,” Westerman said.

The delays in addressing maintenance issues distract students from learning, members of Congress and tribal leaders agreed.

“Delays mean an inability to feed children because of spoiled food in the broken refrigerators. Delays mean students struggling to focus as rainwater leaks into their classroom,” said Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), chair of the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

A 2021 report from Stanford University, The Arizona Republic and ProPublica found that students in bureau-run schools score below the national average on standardized tests by more than two grade levels.

Several Indigenous leaders requested that the federal government transfer control over buildings, replacements and repairs to tribes under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975.

Jason Dropik, executive director of the National Indian Education Association, said tribal control of federal funding to run the schools themselves would help “eliminate some of that red tape.” Dropik, a member of the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, asked to increase funding from the Great American Outdoors Act and implement advance appropriations to address the backlog of deferred maintenance orders.

For the 2023-24 school year, the Interior Department projected spending about $6,900 per student in BIE schools. Conversely, the Defense Department said in 2023 that it spent about $25,000 per student in the Department of Defense Education Activity, the only other federally operated school system.

Rep. Maxine Dexter (D-Ore.) noted that none of the tribes at the hearing received more money for their schools after similar congressional testimonies in the past. She criticized Senate Republicans for seeking to decrease federal funding for tribal schools.

“We can’t fix an underfunding problem by further underfunding,” Dexter said.

Since 2013, the BIE has implemented the Government Accountability Office’s recommendations for school safety and construction, including conducting annual inspections at all buildings. However, Melissa Emrey-Arras, director of GAO’s education, workforce and income security team, said the bureau still lacks clear procedures for other key issues, like training special education staff or monitoring certain financial transactions.

Roy Tracy, interim superintendent of schools at the Department of Diné Education in the Navajo Nation, said the bureau’s changes in the last decade fail to fully compensate for over a century of failed policies for Indigenous schools. He praised the tribal leaders who sat before Congress and demanded more direct financial support for their nations.

“Empower us,” he said. “Trust us. Pass that funding along.”

Sec. of Education nominee evades questions on department’s agenda

WASHINGTON –  Senate Democrats pressed Secretary of Education nominee Linda McMahon on her views for President Donald Trump’s education agenda including DEI, school choice and the president’s promise to downsize the Department of Education at her confirmation hearing Thursday. 

“I’m not quite certain, and I’d like to look into it further and get back to you on that,” said McMahon, offering a similar answer to multiple questions from Democrats. 

McMahon’s nomination comes at a time when President Trump is seeking to abolish the Department of Education. Though he will need approval from Congress to abolish the federal agency, downsizing efforts are already underway. 

McMahon said she was on board with the president’s goals and she is “ready to enact” his vision if confirmed as secretary. 

“Long before there was a Department of Education, we fulfilled the programs of our educational system… I am really all for the president’s mission which is to return education to the states. I believe as he does that the best education is closest to the child,” she said. 

A point of emphasis was “taking the bureaucracy out of education.” However, she clarified that states and localities will continue to receive federal funding amidst downsizing efforts. 

“It is not the president’s goal to defund the programs. It is only to have it operate more efficiently,” she said. 

According to Sen. Jon Husted (R-Ohio), this means “changing the way that the money gets to these students in schools,” not cutting funding for children and disabled children. 

Though McMahon said she did not intend to cut funding for disabled children, she said the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) may be a better fit for a different federal agency. 

“Might it be better served in a different agency, I’m not sure. It started at HEW (Health, Education and Welfare) and the concerns for disabilities and health issues with students may very well rest better within an agency that has more oversight of all of those,” she said. 

McMahon said special education will continue to receive funding, but it could come from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), “where it started.”

“So I just want to be clear you’re going to put special education in the hands of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,” Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) said. 

Despite Democrat senators questioning how exactly specific programs would be cut in the process of downsizing, McMahon gave evasive answers.

“It is my goal, if I am confirmed, to get in and access these kinds of programs because I’m not sure yet what the impact of all of those programs are,” she said.

With Trump’s recent executive order on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), McMahon was also questioned on how schools will be able to determine whether they are running a DEI program and therefore at risk of cuts in federal funding. 

“[DEI] is a program that’s tough. It was put in place ostensibly for more diversity, for equity and inclusion and I think what we’re seeing is that it’s having an opposite effect,” McMahon said. “We are not achieving what we wanted to achieve with inclusion.” 

McMahon struggled to answer Sen. Christopher Murphy (D-Conn.) when he asked if public schools would be risking funding if they had clubs that students could belong to based on their racial or ethnic identity. 

“Well I certainly today don’t want to address hypothetical situations. I would like, once I am confirmed, to get in and assess these programs,” she said. 

Murphy responded that this answer was “chilling,” and McMahon said she would “like to fully know what the order is and what those clubs are doing.” 

Murphy followed up asking if a class on African American history could also be a violation of this executive order on DEI.  

“I’m not quite certain, and I’d like to look into it further,” McMahon said. 

Protests disrupted the confirmation hearing four times, mostly by teachers. 

“Can you imagine these people teaching our kids in classrooms across America and they come here and act like children with outbursts…?” Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) said. 

Sen. Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) responded to Banks’s statement. 

“The passionate educators who have come here today not on behalf of themselves, they’re here on behalf of our children,” she said. “They are exactly the kind of people who we want teaching our children.” 

The committee is scheduled to vote on McMahon’s nomination on Thursday, Feb. 20, 2025.

Health & Science

Lawmakers, experts propose solutions to health, security risks of foreign-manufactured drugs

WASHINGTON – Lawmakers and experts argued that the U.S. supply chain’s overreliance on foreign-manufactured medicines, particularly from China and India, poses both health and national security risks during a Senate hearing on Wednesday.

The Senate Special Committee on Aging held the hearing after a recent ProPublica investigation uncovered that the FDA silently allowed over 20 overseas factories to continue sending medicines to the U.S., even though they were manufactured at plants the agency had banned because of contamination and other violations.

“The federal government needs to ensure access to safe and high-quality drugs now,” said Committee Chairman Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla).

On Tuesday, Sen. Scott urged Department of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer to place tariffs on foreign-made generic drugs. He also announced legislation on country of origin labeling for prescription drugs.

Other solutions proposed during the hearing included establishing a federal buyer’s market, strengthening the oversight of foreign manufacturing facilities, and increasing domestic government contracts.

“Americans shouldn’t have to worry about the quality of their prescriptions, whether they’re safe to be able to take, whether they’re effective, what will happen if the supply chain breaks,” said Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). “And for me, that’s reason enough to manufacture right here in the United States, and using federal contracts to lower those production costs.”

Tony Sardella, founder of the API Innovation Center, said that 83 of the top 100 generic drugs consumed by U.S. citizens lack a U.S.-based source for their active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). As of 2022, 91% of all prescriptions in the U.S. are for generic medicines, according to the FDA Office of Generic Drugs.

A study of FDA warning letters headed by Sardella found that one in every four prescriptions in the U.S. is supplied by a facility that has received an FDA violation since 2020. 

“We don’t want to be alarmist,” said Sardella. “Some of these are very simple paper and procedural warning letters, but it does include others where there’s more severe issues, quality issues, safety issues, manufacturing issues, impurity issues.”

Lawmakers also discussed the danger of relying on drugs manufactured overseas and the national security risks.

Ranking Member Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) said the long-term cost of poorly-manufactured medicines and risks to national security is likely much higher than the cost of compounding and manufacturing these drugs in the U.S.. 

“If we’re at war with China, and you can’t get antibiotics into this country, and how many millions of people die, the cost of that is trillions of dollars. It’s incomprehensible,” she said.

Dr. Marta E. Wosińska, Senior Fellow at the Center on Health Policy at The Brookings Institution, said the level of engagement and bipartisan cooperation by legislators was “striking.”

“I was really, really glad to see this hearing being put on by Senate Aging,” she said, “because the members of this committee sit on a lot of really other critical committees of jurisdiction where they can actually put a lot of these policies in place.”

Despite all of the concerns about where the drugs originate, Dr. Wosińska stresses the importance of continuing to take prescribed medicine.

“It’s still much better to take a Chinese drug than not to take one,” she said.

Bill Nye, Rep. Ivey fight proposed NASA cuts

WASHINGTON – Bill Nye, the “Science Guy,” called for Congress to reject the White House’s proposed cuts to NASA’s funding.

Nye is a long-time television personality and CEO of the Planetary Society, a nonprofit organization that promotes space exploration. He gathered with around 300 advocates at the U.S. Capitol on Monday as part of the society’s annual Day of Action to maintain NASA’s budget.

The proposed White House budget for the 2025-2026 fiscal year, which began Oct. 1, slashes NASA’s funding by 24%, from around $24.8 billion to $18.8 billion.

Science research funding, which includes Earth science, planetary science and astrophysics, would be hardest hit by an unprecedented 47% cut.

In a bipartisan rejection of these proposals, both the House and Senate budget drafts leave NASA’s overall funding untouched at the current $24.8 billion.

Eight representatives also signed a letter to the House Committee on Appropriations in September. Signees represented both parties, including Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) and Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.).

But Congress is far from finalizing a budget. And amid a government shutdown that has furloughed more than 15,000 of NASA’s 18,000 workers, the Trump administration’s budget recommendation could put agency funding on the chopping block.

Nye said most people do not consider the economic benefits of NASA’s research. Every dollar spent, he said, returns $3 to the U.S. economy.

NASA’s projects generated more than $75.6 billion and 300,000 jobs nationwide in the 2023-2024 fiscal year, according to its most recent report.

Indeed, Nye said most modern technology would not exist without research in space and science.

“The reason we’re able to have this recording on your phone is because of investments in space,” Nye told Medill News Service.

These innovations, along with numerous space missions, have helped develop NASA into a global brand, he said.

But the Trump administration’s proposed budget terminates what it calls “unaffordable” projects like Mars Sample Return, a mission that aims to bring samples from Mars back to Earth.

This would cause the U.S. to fall behind China in space exploration, Rep. Glenn Ivey (D-Md.) said.

“China is doing the exact opposite,” Ivey told Medill News Service. “They’re pushing money and engineers and talent towards these sorts of research fields and giving them every opportunity to thrive. We should be doing the same thing.”

Ivey said the cuts would also risk NASA’s early career resources. These include fellowships that fund graduate students like Columbia University Ph.D. student Kalima Bukenya.

Bukenya, a former NASA intern, told Medill News Service she visited Washington, D.C. for the first time to attend the Day of Action.

“My future is invested in just being able to work for NASA,” Bukenya said. “To have these cuts, I don’t know what I’m going to do next.”

Latest in Environment

EPA proposes changes to how it evaluates the risks of toxic chemicals

WASHINGTON — The EPA proposed changing how it evaluates the risks of toxic chemicals, aiming to make the process more efficient for the manufacturing industry.

“This work is yet another example of how we can and will protect human health and the environment while allowing manufacturing and industrial sectors to thrive,” EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in the news release on Sept. 22.

The Toxic Substances Control Act was passed by Congress in 1976 to protect human health and the environment from risks posed by toxic chemicals used in manufacturing commercial products, like plastics and rubber. It was flagged for review after President Donald Trump issued an executive order in February, directing agencies to identify regulations that need to change to better fit with the administration’s policies.

The EPA said in a statement that the amendments will not affect its method for reviewing toxic substances. Instead, the proposed rule would evaluate the risk of each condition of use separately, including the manufacture, distribution, use and disposal of the chemical.

It would also consider the effect of personal protective equipment in mitigating risk during the evaluations. Earthjustice Attorney Kelly Lester said that considering personal protective equipment endangers workers by lessening the danger.

“If EPA is understating the risk at the front end, then the protections that it’s going to put into place at the risk management stage are going to be insufficient,” Lester said.

Lester added she is concerned the amended evaluation process would overlook air exposure and the cumulative effects of chemical plants in the same vicinity.

For example, some chemicals involved in the manufacturing process are released through the air and water into surrounding communities. If there are multiple chemical facilities in the same area, there are increased, or “aggregate,” risks of chemical exposure for nearby residents.

By allowing aggregate risks to be excluded from evaluations, the proposed rule would underestimate the danger these toxic substances pose, Lester said.

“(TSCA) looks at a chemical throughout the life cycle in order to understand the true risk that the chemical faces,” Lester said. “You can’t just ignore slices of that and then say, ‘Okay, here’s what the risk is.’ You have to look at the entire thing.”

The American Chemistry Council, which advocates for the chemical industry, said the proposed changes to the review process would improve efficiency and transparency for businesses.

“For chemical manufacturers and the countless downstream sectors that rely on our industry’s innovative materials, clearer processes mean more predictable timelines, consistent guidelines and greater confidence when making business and investment decisions,” Kimberly Wise White, vice president of regulatory and scientific affairs at the ACC, said in an email statement.

She added that the proposal considers “real-world” applications of toxic substances.

This is not the industry’s first push for separate evaluations for each condition of use.

Under the Biden administration, the EPA changed the TSCA risk evaluation process to consider all exposure pathways and parts of the chemical’s life cycle.

The ACC, chemical manufacturers and labor unions petitioned a review of the 2024 rule in court for requiring evaluations to include all conditions of use. The litigation hinted that changes were coming down the pipe.

“We thought that a lot of these changes were coming,” Lester said. “And the rule did not disappoint in that regard.”

Some of the proposed changes backed by the EPA and chemical industry have already been challenged in court for endangering human health and the environment.

Congress passed a bipartisan act in 2016 to revise the TSCA, which allowed the EPA to identify and regulate the risks of toxic chemicals used in commercial products.

In 2017, the EPA announced a framework for evaluating the risks posed by toxic chemicals. It did not require evaluations for all conditions of use, similar to the 2025 proposal.

Several advocacy groups and labor unions sued the EPA on the grounds that its final rule endangered human health. In 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled the EPA could not ignore the long-term effect of a chemical’s use, even after it stops being manufactured. For example, asbestos is no longer manufactured but still found in older paint, insulation and more. The agency said in a statement that it will follow the court’s ruling.

The appeals court did not rule on whether the EPA was allowed to evaluate conditions of use separately.

“In that case, one very significant thing that the court did was say that certain conditions of use cannot be categorically excluded from consideration under a risk evaluation,” Lester said. “And that is something that this proposed rule basically ignores.”

Roadless Rule rescission met with outcry

WASHINGTON – As the U.S. Department of Agriculture moves to eliminate a measure prohibiting road construction in select remote areas, some experts warn of environmental consequences.

The long-contested 2001 Roadless Rule established prohibitions on road construction and timber harvesting in almost 60 million acres of inventoried roadless areas in the National Forest System, with some exceptions. Now, the USDA has encountered uproar as they begin to repeal the rule.

“The backcountry wild areas protected by the Roadless Rule are universally enjoyed and integral to what makes this nation special,” environmental advocates said in a joint statement from The Wilderness Society, Earthjustice, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Alaska Wilderness League. “As Americans, we have the right to explore these wild places — and we will not stand for auctioning them off to the highest bidder.”

These organizations say that the Roadless Rule is essential for protecting cherished public land.

Opponents of the rule have said that restricting access to natural resources like timber, minerals and energy hinders economic development. Some have also said that local land managers should have more flexibility than a national rule allows.

In a statement, a USDA spokesperson offered another reason for repealing the rule, saying it “is more important than ever” to aid wildfire mitigation.

“Roads improve access for wildland firefighting when timing is critical, and lives are at risk,” the spokesperson said. “As the Secretary stated, the lack of maintenance and access have frustrated land managers for years, including firefighters who haven’t been able to reach fires in time to slow their spread.”

Some counter this idea, claiming that wildfires are more likely to occur near roads.

Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins announced in June that the U.S. Department of Agriculture would rescind the rule. In late August, the USDA opened a public comment period, formally beginning the process to repeal it.

The document received over 600,000 comments before the Sept. 19 deadline. According to environmental non-profit Earthjustice, at least half a million of those respondents opposed the rollback.

Still, some lawmakers in affected states have lauded the decision to repeal the rule.

“The Roadless Rule has never fit Alaska, so I welcome this effort to rescind it,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said in a June statement. “Repeal will not lead to environmental harm, but it will help open needed opportunities for renewable energy, forestry, mining, tourism, and more in areas that are almost completely under federal control.”

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) agrees. In a statement issued in July, he described the rule as an “environmental disaster.”

There are several more steps that the USDA must take to formalize the measure. The Forest Service plans to publish a draft environmental impact statement around March 2026 and says it will accept more public comments around that time.

The decision aligns with a series of Trump administration executive orders that have focused on deregulation and the removal of perceived barriers to resource extraction.

Through these executive orders and other remarks, the Trump administration has rebuked climate-friendly policy. While addressing the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday, President Donald Trump lamented the “global warming hoax” that he said has captivated the globe.

“It’s the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world,” Trump said.

Yet, the USDA spokesperson cautioned that this move “would not automatically authorize commercial harvest, road construction or any other on-the-ground activity,” as decisions relating to land management would be subject to national forest or grassland management plans.

However, there have already been moves to increase drilling in protected areas outside of the Roadless Rule’s purview. In early September, the House voted in support of a mining road through the Alaskan wilderness. The measure is expected to clear the Senate soon.

And, Trump himself continues to demonstrate interest in mining and extractive operations.

“We have an expression,” Trump said Tuesday at the UN. “Drill, baby, drill. And that’s what we’re doing.”

Latest in National Security

Lawmakers agree legislation needed to protect DOD data in bipartisan consensus

WASHINGTON –  Democrats and Republicans expressed unified concerns on the need to protect Department of Defense personnel’s data during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Tuesday.

Publicly available data across social media and other private information stored in cellular devices carried by military personnel and DOD contractors can be easily weaponized by U.S. adversaries, namely China and Russia, according to testimony delivered to the Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee.

In 2018, the fitness app Strava exposed sensitive military information, including base locations and layouts, when soldiers used the app to track their exercise routes in its online map. Separately, in 2024, U.S. internet-service providers including AT&T, Verizon and Lumen Technologies, were hacked in a cyber attack by the Chinese government to gain access to presidential candidate communications. The attackers, dubbed ‘Salt Typhoon’, targeted vulnerabilities in unencrypted communication.

Justin Sherman, the founder and CEO of Global Cyber Strategies, told the Medill News Service that protections should have been put in place to protect against these attacks ten years ago.

“What can we do next year to ensure that whether it’s a contracting provision or more resourcing or a training requirement, that we are at least inserting more requirements then we have now,” said Sherman.

The United States Government Accountability Office released a report titled, “DOD Needs to Address Security Risks of Publicly Accessible Information” following the hearing. The report made 12 recommendations, including collaboration across the DOD to keep sensitive data out of public forums and called for the implementation of routine security checks as well as programs to educate service members.  

Michael Stokes, Vice President of Strategy at Ridgeline International, emphasized the need for DOD to avoid using open-source, publicly available infrastructure that can be exploited by adversaries.

“This conversation has been going on since 2016,” said Stokes, adding, “it’s just now coming out into the open more, so I’m thrilled that it’s now in the public and we are looking at this problem from a holistic view,” Stokes said. 

Sen. Garry Peters (D-Mich.) recognized the need to protect critical DOD data as the threat of emerging technology grows.

“There’s no question that AI has tremendous potential for bringing great good to our society, but there are also ways in which AI can be used in more nefarious ways, so it’s important for us to have oversight and thoughtful regulation, and there’s got to be a way we can do that in a bipartisan way,” Sen. Peters said. 

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) agreed.

“It’s just common sense we’re dealing with a lot more information that’s being put out in the digital space. We want to make sure that people know that it’s, it’s accurate, it’s authentic and it is a bipartisan bill so we’re very hopeful,” Sen. Ernst said.

Trump hosts Turkish President Erdoğan for talks on fighter jets, Russia

WASHINGTON President Donald Trump met with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan at the White House on Thursday for the first time since the U.S. imposed sanctions on Turkey in 2020 for purchasing an air defense system from Russia. Now, President Erdoğan is hoping to negotiate a deal with the Trump administration to end the sanctions and purchase F-16 and F-35 fighter jets.

Under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), Trump’s 2020 sanctions on Turkey remain in place, preventing Turkey from purchasing F-35 and F-16 fighter jets from Lockheed Martin.

Trump said on Thursday that those sanctions against Turkey could be lifted “almost immediately” if the meeting went well. 

Separately, after the meeting, U.S. Ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack announced a deal that allows Turkish Airlines to purchase up to 300 Boeing aircraft. 

Trump reflected on his relationship with Erdoğan at the beginning of the meeting. 

“This is a tough man. This is a guy who is highly opinionated,” Trump said. “Usually I don’t like opinionated people, but I always like this one.”

Erdoğan expressed hope that Trump will help bring peace to Eastern Europe and the Middle East. 

“Together we will be able to overcome the challenges in the region,” Erdoğan said.

Trump said he thinks Turkey’s role is significant in ending the war in Ukraine. However, the president emphasized “the best thing” Turkey could do is stop purchasing oil and gas from Russia.

“He’s got tremendous influence in the region,” Trump said.

Since the Alaska summit with President Vladimir Putin just over a month ago, Trump appears to have soured on the Russian president, admitting he is “very disappointed in Putin” regarding his continued aggression in Ukraine.

“It’s such a waste of human life,” Trump said. “Putin ought to stop.”

The Israel-Gaza war was also discussed during Thursday’s meeting. On Tuesday, Erdoğan was present during a meeting in New York between Trump and eight leaders of Arab and Muslim-majority countries, where Trump laid out a 21-point postwar plan to end the war. 

“I have to meet with Israel. They know what I want,” Trump said on Thursday. “I think we can get that one done.”

Turkey has been firm in its criticism of Israel. In late August, the country announced that it would close its airspace to Israeli planes and end trade between Israel and other countries seeking to use Turkey’s ports.

Despite continued support for Israel from the Trump administration, Trump and Erdoğan appeared friendly towards each other Thursday, signaling continued cooperation between the two leaders.

“I have great respect for this man, and we’ve had a very good relationship for a long time,” Trump said.

Latest in Living

Photo Essay: New Orleans spirit comes to Washington at eighth annual Mardi Gras celebration

WASHINGTON – Mardi Gras celebrations filled Wharf Street Saturday as attendees packed the street with food, laughter, music and dancing. 

The celebration kicked off with an hour-long parade down Wharf Street. Over 40 organizations participated in the parade, including community partners like the Eastern High School Marching Band and Command Force of the Washington Commanders. 

Golf carts embellished in purple, green and gold, the Mardi Gras king and queen and jugglers were just a few of the parade’s highlights. The New Orleans spirit could be felt in Washington as crowds cheered and reached for the beads, toys and candy that were tossed their way. 

The parade was followed by live music by local bands at different outdoor stages along Wharf Street. Families and friends came together to enjoy food and drinks while dancing to the music. The celebrations came to a close with fireworks that decorated the sky. 


Mardi Gras flags lined Wharf Street as Batalá Washington, an all-women Afro-Brazilian music band, announced the start of the parade with the sound of drums. (Jiah Choe/MNS)


Addie, Asia and Jodie showed their Mardi Gras spirit from head to toe. Jodie is from New Orleans, and Addie and Asia are Washington residents. “It’s a big deal, bring the party home,” Asia said. (Jiah Choe/MNS)


Rachelle, Kathleen, Margie, Jennifer, Lynn and Melissa are long-time friends and residents of D.C. and Virginia. Kathleen has been to every single one of the eight Mardi Gras celebrations at The Wharf. “We love it. It gets us out of the house,” Rachelle said. (Jiah Choe/MNS)


Beads and candies weren’t the only things being tossed to the audience. Children and adults alike reached for the bubbles flowing out of the bubble machines while some took photos. (Jiah Choe/MNS)


The Wharf invited local businesses to decorate golf carts as an alternative to the floats traditionally used in New Orleans. The family friendly event had several young participants, some even playing a role in the parade and tossing beaded necklaces to attendees. (Jiah Choe/MNS)


Some attendees chose to enjoy the parade with an aerial view from restaurant balconies and rooftops. Parade participants made sure everyone was included in the celebration, as they tossed beads as high as they could to reach the attendees watching from above. (Jiah Choe/MNS)


Humans weren’t the only ones celebrating Mardi Gras at The Wharf. Local residents “Percy and his human servants” also joined the celebrations in colorful Mardi Gras costumes. (Jiah Choe/MNS)


Performers, jugglers and stilt walkers filled the parade with entertainment and excitement. (Jiah Choe/MNS)


Bella, Manny and Prince are from New Orleans. They came to Washington for their catering business, Mardi Gras Munchies (@mardigrasmunchies on Instagram). They are “an authentic Cajun Creole New Orleans cuisine” with pop-ups every week. Their son, Prince, is six months old. This was his first Mardi Gras. (Jiah Choe/MNS)


Attendees lined up to take photos with Mardi Gras performers at a photo station set up near the outdoor stages. (Jiah Choe/MNS)


Attendees gathered around outdoor stages along Wharf Street after the parade to listen and dance to live music performed by local bands. (Jiah Choe/MNS)


The Experience Band & Show was one of the local bands that performed live music at The Wharf. They performed on the Transit Pier Floating Stage. (Jiah Choe/MNS)


Watch: The Great American Water Taste Test brings friendly competition to Capitol Hill

WASHINGTON — The National Rural Water Association held its 26th annual Great American Water Taste Test on Wednesday. The Bear River Water Conservancy District of Utah took home the championship. 

Samples are judged on three categories: clarity, bouquet and overall taste.

This competition is a part of the NRWA’s annual rally. Members of the organization travel to the nation’s capital to lobby their representatives about issues facing the rural water industry. 

Watch the video report here:

Latest Business

Senate hearing on Biden-era censorship shifts to debate on Trump administration threats, Kimmel suspension

WASHINGTON – Lawmakers and witnesses emphasized the threat government censorship poses to First Amendment rights in a Senate Commerce hearing Wednesday, with Republicans referencing Biden officials’ censorship of social media and Democrats focusing on the current weaponization of free speech by the Trump administration. 

The hearing followed an investigation led by Committee Chairman Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)’s role in “jawboning” big tech companies into disproportionately silencing conservative viewpoints during the Biden presidency. The practice of jawboning refers to the “inappropriate demands made of private actors by government officials,” according to a paper published by the Cato Institute

In a report outlining the investigation, the Committee found that CISA “acted outside both the First Amendment and its own authority” by conducting a censorship campaign of “constitutionally protected speech.” The Supreme Court reviewed these censorship claims in a 2024 case Murthy v. Missouri and sided with the Biden administration in a 6-3 ruling, citing that the plaintiffs lacked sufficient standing to sue. 

“This hearing is a farce,” Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) said. “We are not focusing on the imminent threat to the First Amendment, the beating heart of democracy.” 

Markey noted that the Committee is “re-litigating an issue that the Supreme Court has already decided” and focused his questioning on the ongoing threats made by the Trump administration to revoke media outlets’ access and licenses based on their “editorial decisions.” 

Senate Democrats also tailored their remarks and questioning to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chair Brendan Carr’s role in the temporary suspension of Jimmy Kimmel’s late night show. In an appearance on Benny Johnson’s podcast last month, Carr said, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” in reference to ABC and local affiliates. Hours later, ABC announced it was pulling Kimmel’s show. 

Ranking Member Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) outlined the chain of events that led to the pre-empting of Kimmel’s show following his comments on Charlie Kirk’s assassination and argued that they should “alarm every American.” 

“I think indeed the remarks made by Chairman Carr seemed to be an attempt at coercion,” said Eugene Volokh, senior fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. “Whether or not they actually caused the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel, they were an attempt to do something the Constitution does not allow.”   

“I certainly hope that Chairman Carr does come here to testify,” said Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-New Mexico). “There’s several of us that have authored legislation to protect [the First Amendment] and maybe it’s something that can become bipartisan.” 

In his testimony, CEO and Co-Founder of conservative magazine The Federalist Sean Davis claimed that the “defenses of media millionaires like Jimmy Kimmel are based more on partisanship than any sort of actual belief in free speech.” Davis testified on CISA’s role in “directing and funding censorship efforts” based on the outlet’s criticism of the government and media response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the Black Lives Matter (BLM) moment. 

Kirk’s assassination itself also emerged as a recurring topic among lawmakers and witnesses, with Davis describing his murder as an example of the rippling effects of censorship. 

“It begins with censorship, it moves to the destruction of statues and monuments, and it ends with the murder of people,” Davis said. 

Despite intense debate and divided opinion on Biden and Trump censorship campaigns, Luján acknowledged that “there is a lot of agreement” within the Committee. 

“I don’t know anyone in that room that disagrees with protecting the First Amendment…no one,” Luján said. 

The Committee will continue ongoing discussions on free speech protections and has invited Carr to testify before a panel over Kimmel’s suspension. A hearing date has not yet been announced.


Published in conjunction with UPI Logo

Government shutdown leaves policymakers, economists in the dark on ‘jobs Friday’

WASHINGTON – From Washington to Wall Street, policymakers and economists await the release of the monthly jobs report, published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on the first Friday of every month, commonly known as “jobs Friday.”

This past Friday morning, October 3, however, the anticipated economic release was replaced with something else —an announcement on the BLS website regarding the “suspension of federal government services.”

The government shutdown halted nonessential services across several agencies, including the production of economic data by the BLS. That meant a delay in September’s employment report.

The last time a government shutdown delayed the jobs report was in 2013, and the report was released a few weeks later once the government reopened.

The jobs report provides Americans a snapshot of employment trends, drawing upon two primary surveys: Current Employment Statistics (CES) and Current Population Survey (CPS). The CES program or “establishment” survey tracks metrics such as payroll, hours worked and wages earned. The CPS or “household” survey tracks labor force characteristics such as participation, unemployment rate and demographic factors.

“I think the jobs report is the most personal part of the economy,” said Tom Beers, executive director of the National Association for Business Economics (NABE). “It’s who’s working and who’s not, and it allows you to put your own life into that perspective.”

In addition to helping individuals keep track of the national employment situation, the jobs report informs critical policymaking, namely that of the Federal Reserve. The central bank relies on employment data, among other metrics, to determine the path forward for interest rates.

A cooling labor market coupled with above-target inflation has left the Board of Governors in a precarious position regarding interest rate cuts. The delayed September jobs data makes their job even harder.

“Sometimes (the jobs report) may be the only data that the Fed or business decision makers have on the previous month when they’re trying to make a call on something,” Beers said. “They’ll have to look elsewhere to piece the story together.”

Alternative sources of data include a private-sector employment report from payroll processor Automatic Data Processing (ADP) as well as proprietary data from the Carlyle Group, an alternative asset management firm.

While the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) announced a 25-basis-point reduction at last month’s meeting, St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President Alberto Musalem emphasized the need to “tread cautiously.”

St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President Alberto Musalem discusses economic and monetary policy at Brookings. (Courtesy of The Brookings Institution)

“Overemphasizing the labor market objective runs the risk of excessive policy easing,” Musalem said. “Overemphasizing the inflation objective runs the risk of not providing enough support to maintain a full employment labor market at a time when downside risks have risen.”

BLS reports may be in limbo during the government shutdown, but the Trump administration’s attacks on the data’s integrity poses a roadblock for the agency even after the government reopens.

In a statement following the BLS’s annual benchmark revisions in September, the White House argued for the need to “restore Americans’ trust in the data after years of inaccuracy that has misled policymakers and eroded confidence.”

According to Elise Gould, a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, the value of the Bureau’s data “cannot be overstated.”

“The politicalization of that data can be harmful to public trust and the agencies themselves,” Gould said. “Federal employees have come under attack and the loss of workers could impact the quality and timeliness of the data that’s provided.”

Nearly one week into a government shutdown and a Federal Reserve meeting on the horizon, lawmakers have reiterated the need for this data as well.

In an interview with Medill News Service, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said, “Donald Trump has undermined the integrity of that report and it’s essential that it be done by nonpartisan federal employees. We hope we can resume getting it as soon as possible.”

SOTU: Health Care

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Congress should approve his plan to replace Obamacare with a new health care program that would provide “affordable alternative” insurance options and criticized Democrats for trying to impose “a socialist takeover of our health care system.”

“A good life for American families requires the most affordable, innovative and high-quality health care system on earth,” Trump said in his third State of the Union address.

Trump said he has proposed health care plans that would be up to 60% cheaper than the Affordable Care Act plans. Both the White House and the Department of Health and Human Services did not respond when asked if a specific replacement plan has existed or ever will.

The president blamed Democrats for not providing the American people with the health care reforms he has promised.

“As we work to improve Americans’ health care, there are those who want to take away your health care, take away your doctor, and abolish private insurance entirely,” said Trump, referring to the Democrats.

Democrats stood up at this comment, pointed their fingers at Trump and shouted “YOU.”

Trump said 130 Democrats endorse legislation to impose a “socialist takeover” of the health care system by “taking away the private health insurance plans of 180 million.”

Democratic presidential candidates Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., are pushing for a “Medicare for All” plan that would end private health insurance while other candidates like former Vice President Joe Biden, Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., are pushing to expand on Obamacare.

“We will never let socialism destroy American health care,” Trump said.

Trump emphasized the administration’s efforts to protect patients with pre-existing conditions, to which Democrats threw up their hands and shook their heads in disagreement. Led by House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Senate and House Democrats brought more than 80 patients, doctors and health care advocates from across the country as guests to the speech.

“President Trump will speak to an audience filled with Americans who are suffering because of his broken promises on prescription drug costs and his all-out assault on Americans with preexisting conditions,” Pelosi said in a press release Tuesday morning.

The president also called upon Congress to pass legislation to lower prescription drug prices.

“Get a bill to my desk, and I will sign it into law without delay,” the president said.

Democrats responded to this by booing and holding up three fingers to represent H.R. 3, legislation proposed by the late Rep. Elijah E. Cummings that would require the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to negotiate certain drug prices. The bill has been on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s desk for over a month after being passed in the House.

Generic prescription drug prices dropped 1% in 2018, the first price drop in 45 years, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. Trump said it was the first time in 51 years. Brand-name drug prices, however, are still increasing.

Trump said the administration will continue to make health care more transparent by requiring hospitals to make their prices negotiated with insurers public and easily accessible online. He also pointed to the passage of administration-backed legislation called “Right to Try,” which allows terminally ill patients access to drugs not fully approved by the Food and Drug Administration if they feel they have tried all other options.

He also said he has launched new initiatives to improve care for Americans with kidney disease, Alzheimer’s and those struggling with mental health challenges, in addition to pursuing new cures for childhood cancer and AIDS.

The House Ways and Means Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday afternoon to further discuss Trump’s health care policies and overcoming pharmaceutical barriers in particular.

Trump Sticks By Wall in State of the Union Address

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump’s call for a wall to secure America’s southern border in his State of the Union address Tuesday night was no surprise to opponents.

Jennifer Johnson, the policy director at the Southern Border Communities Coalition, said Trump continually characterizes the southern border as a violent area.

“More of a reality check, these are families and children seeking protection, fleeing spiraling violence and poverty,” she said.

Chris Montoya, who served as a Customs and Border Protection agent for 21 years, said that “crime rates are pretty low in border cities. Being a border patrol agent is one of the safest law enforcement jobs. All those things together means a safe border.”

Rep.  Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y., invited as his guest a mother who had been separated from her children at the border.

Other Democrats brought undocumented immigrants as their guests, including Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., Rep. Jimmy Gomez, D-Calif., and Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-N.J.

Rep. Sheila Jackson, D-Texas, was enthusiastic about their attendance at the address. “Their presence here today is representative of the big tent that America is,” she said.

In his address, Trump attributed what he called at crisis at the border to America’s “reduced jobs, lower wages, overburdened schools, and hospitals that are so crowded you can’t get in.” He referenced San Diego and El Paso as being cities that were once violent, and now safe with the addition of physical barriers.

Trump also mentioned the prevalence of MS-13 within the country. “They almost all come through our Southern border,” he said.

Montoya said MS-13 members do enter through the southern border on rare occasions, but it is uncommon for CBP agents to make an arrest.

Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin is the ranking member on the Senate Subcommittee for Border Security and Immigration. He said nothing changed in Trump’s rhetoric. “If we’re waiting on him, we’re not going to get this solved,” he said.

Washingtonians alternately protest, celebrate the State of the Union

WASHINGTON – DC-area residents had very different reactions to President Donald Trump’s second State of the Union address Tuesday night. But whether they celebrated or denounced the event, emotions were strong.

Around 40-50 people gathered at each of two intersections near the Capitol ahead of the address  — far fewer than the 400 people who protested last year, according to Resist DC, the community action group that organized both years’ protests.

People lined the sidewalks along the streets that President Donald Trump, Vice President Mike Pence and other Trump cabinet members’ motorcades were expected pass by. They held homemade signs lit with string lights so they would be visible to government officials in their cars and chanted anti-Trump messages to music and drums.

Eileen Minarick, 70, said she was protesting simply “because the state of our union is terrible.”

Members of Herndon-Reston Indivisible, a group created to resist President Trump's policies and elect Democrats to office, held lit-up letters spelling “Fraud” and “Yuge Liar.” (Ester Wells/MNS)40-50 protestors were stationed at each of two points along 3rd Street NW in Washington, D.C. (Ester Wells/MNS)Protestors waved Russian flags as they waited along the sidewalk. (Ester Wells/MNS)A protestor held a lit-up sign as he shouted the words. (Ester Wells/MNS)Eileen Minarick, 70, said, “I don’t feel I’m protesting Trump. I’m protesting the policies of his administration, which are inhuman.” (Ester Wells/MNS)(Ester Wells/MNS)Police cars and officers patrolled the streets surrounding the Capitol, many of which were blocked off to both vehicles and pedestrians. (Ester Wells/MNS)Patrons don pink stickers and resistance apparel as they listen to activist speakers and wait for President Trump's State of the Union address to begin  (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Sitting in front of the projector, a stray star is caught on actor Danny Glover's face as he prepares to educate attendees about the conflict in Latin America. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Co-founder of CODEPINK, Madea Benjamin addresses the crowd as other speakers converse with audience members. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)The classic pairing of wine and board games is at every table, except with a twist. In order to ‘survive the night’ patrons mark a square every time President Trump utters a common saying. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Violence against women must end, said Chad Smith, a trainer with nonprofit organization Men Can Stop Rape. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)All eyes are trained on the screen as Trump enters the House Chamber for the State of the Union address. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Grinning, a man in a Make America Great Again hat listens as President Donald Trump announced “I will get it built” in reference to a southern border wall at a local Young Republicans watch party. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)A sign welcomes members of the DC Young Republicans and Arlington Falls Church Young Republicans. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)Members of Republican organizations gather around as President Trump continues past expected time in his State of the Union speech. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)The scene is more mellow downstairs, where a few recluse bar patrons chat with each other as the television screens broadcast in synchrony. (Brooke Fowler/MNS)

Elsewhere in the city, local bar patrons gathered to drink beer, compete in presidential bingo and watch the State of the Union.

Grassroots activist group CODEPINK hosted a number of guest speakers, including actor Danny Glover, for a lively discussion before the main event. Topics ranged from the Bolivarian revolution to ending domestic violence.

Anita Jenkins, spokeswoman for Stand Up for Democracy, riled the crowd with a call to establish the District of Columbia the 51st state in the United States.

“The people of D.C. have no representation… We have nobody to speak for us,” she said. Modifying the words of America’s early founders, she said, “Taxation without representation is a rip-off.”

As President Trump appeared on the projector, shouts of disapproval rose from the bar patrons. The State of the Union 2019 had begun and the energy was energetic in its moroseness.

Across town, the atmosphere was also charged. Members of DC Young Republicans and Arlington Falls Church Young Republicans filled a restaurant for a celebratory viewing party.

“In the past, most of the people in this room voted for a wall… but the proper wall never got built,” said Donald Trump. He paused and then said, “I’ll get it built.” Hoots and hollers erupted in the bar and two girls were seen smiling and hugging each other.

Though Trump stressed unity in his national address, DC-area residents remained divided in their reactions.

2020 Candidates Alternate Cheers, Hisses to Trump Wall, Immigration Proposals during State of Union

WASHINGTON – Several Democratic 2020 presidential candidates expressed their displeasure with many of President Donald Trump’s policies during the State of the Union address Tuesday.

Sens. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., could be seen shaking their heads when Trump mentioned controversial topics such as his commitment to building a border wall and the dangers of migrant caravans heading to the U.S. southern border.

Harris, who announced her candidacy on Jan. 21, shook her head and visibly mouthed, “They’re not,” as Trump said, “Large, organized caravans are on the march to the United States.”

In a Facebook Live address before the State of the Union, Harris told viewers, “It’s a moment for a president to rise above politics and unite the country with a vision that includes all Americans, not just the ones who may have voted for them. It’s a moment to bring us together.”

Early in the address, Harris was often reluctant to give Trump a standing ovation, asking her colleagues, “Really?” as they cheered the president’s comments about space exploration.

The candidates and their Democratic colleagues booed and hissed as Trump labeled the numerous investigations into his campaign finance and relationship with Russia “ridiculous partisan investigations.”

“If there is going to be peace and legislation, there cannot be war and investigation,” he said. “It just doesn’t work that way!”

Democrats cheered later as Trump mentioned that women have filled 58 percent of new jobs in the past year. New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who has formed a presidential exploratory committee, pointed at the newly elected House Democrats, who stood up and chanted, “USA, USA.”

“I think he didn’t realize that all the female jobs he created were for [congresswomen],” Gillibrand said after the speech.

The Democratic candidates stood and applauded with everyone in the chamber when Trump recognized World War II veterans, a SWAT team member and a childhood cancer survivor.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., sat stoically as Trump denounced socialism. Sanders, who calls himself a democratic socialist, is widely considered likely e to enter the presidential race. Unlike Sanders, Gillibrand and Harris stood and applauded as Trump said, “America will never be a socialist country.”

TRUMP STRIKES CHORD WITH WOMEN, FALLS FLAT ON BIPARTISAN BORDER WALL PITCH

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump got one of his biggest rounds of applause during his State of the Union address Tuesday night when he noted that Congress now has a record-high number of elected women, but it wasn’t lost on the crowd that when the women rose to cheer they were mostly on the Democratic side of the aisle.

“Americans can be proud that we have more women in the workforce than ever before,” Trump said as the women lawmakers rose to clap and celebrate. He then advised them “Don’t sit. You’re going to like this.”

“Exactly one century after the Congress passed the constitutional amendment giving women the right to vote, we also have more women serving in the Congress than at any time before,” he said. There were 117 women elected to Congress in 2018.

Bipartisan chants of “USA! USA!” filled the chamber as both the Democrats and Republicans broke into uproarious applause. Many of the Democratic women wore white and donned pins that read “ERA YES,” in a nod to the women of the suffragette movement.

Trump called his list of priorities “the agenda of the American people” in his second State of the Union address Tuesday, which was delayed a week because of the 35-day government shutdown, which didn’t end until the previous Friday. The address was the first the president has delivered before the new Democratic majority in the House.

The president remained on-script for the duration of the 84-minute speech and touted his administration’s achievements from the past two years. He also laid out several legislative priorities going forward, including a “smart, strategic, see-through steel barrier,” an infrastructure bill and the eradication of HIV and AIDS.

Rep. French Hill, R-Ark., was glad that health care was a topic in the speech, while Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., described the speech as “terrific.”

“We haven’t gotten that right when it comes to protection our citizens with pre-existing conditions, correcting all the problems and costs associated with the ACA,” French said. “I like that he kept an emphasis on that while also tackling the prescription drug process.”

For Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., laying out these broad initiatives wasn’t enough.

“I wrote down a number of initiatives — defense spending, cancer research, transportation, infrastructure — and never heard anything of how we’re going to pay for them,” he said.

The president also pushed his plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria and to reduce drastically the number of troops in Afghanistan.

Among Democrats, reactions were mixed as Trump highlighted his achievements. When Trump lauded the U.S. increase in gas and oil production, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., who has championed a Green New Deal to address accelerating climate change, remained seated.

Many Democrats applauded Trump’s push for a new infrastructure bill and decision to withdraw troops from Syria and Afghanistan.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who sat behind Trump with Vice President Mike Pence, was clearly following a printed version of the speech. She applauded when Trump mentioned criminal justice reform and bipartisan efforts on lowering drug costs and furthering women’s rights.

After praising a recent bipartisan effort to secure criminal justice reform, Trump shifted to a project he said would require the same bipartisan effort: a southern border wall.

“Simply put, walls work and walls save lives,” he said. “So let’s work together, compromise and reach a deal that will truly make America safe.”

However, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was not encouraged by the president’s attempt to strike a bipartisan tone.

“I just don’t think he is to be trusted,” she said. “This is not a president who is working for the middle class of this country.”

Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., said that while parts of Trump’s speech were good, he was too combative at times.

“There should have been more emphasis on the fact that the government was shut down and we all need to work together to bring it back,” he said. “Blaming the Democrats is not going to keep the government open.”

Freshmen members of Congress excited, disappointed at their first State of the Union address

WASHINGTON — Before attending his first State of the Union address, Rep. Jefferson Van Drew, D-N.J., felt a sense of excitement and joy, but also feared the president might once again fan partisan flames by rehashing controversial issues.

“I hope that right now, he doesn’t talk about closing the government again. I hope he doesn’t talk right now about declaring a national emergency. I would so much rather see that we try to work together and get something done. That requires flexibility on Democrats side as well. Both sides have to do this,” said Van Drew.

Partisanship is the reason the approval rating for Congress is so low, but issues like border security, and infrastructure deserve cooperation between the two parties, said Van Drew.

“Rather than just argue and disagree and investigative and be hurtful on both sides, maybe we can actually get something get done.”

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Chris Pappas, D-N.H.

Although having been full-fledged members of Congress for a little over a month, the freshmen class of senators and representatives still retains a “sense of awe” about the State of the Union address, said Rep. Chris Pappas, D-N.H. Pappas said he hoped Trump would strike a conciliatory tone with Democrats, allowing lawmakers to avoid a second government shutdown.

Pappas brought a transgender military veteran from his home state to hear the president as a symbol of his hope that Trump’s transgender military service ban will be lifted.

“That doesn’t make us any safer and in fact plays politics with the military,” he said.

In addition to passing social justice reform, Pappas said he would like Trump to speak about the opioid crisis, prescription drug costs and infrastructure — and Trump did.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Sean Casten, D-Ill.

In Illinois Rep. Sean Casten’s dreams, Trump’s State of the Union address would make climate change a priority, but said his expectations were low. Trump did not in fact mention the environment.

“Truth is what I hope he doesn’t say is what I fear he will say,” Casten said, “which is that he’s going to threaten to shut down the government again if he doesn’t get a wall.”

Casten’s guest was Julie Caribeaux, the executive director of Family Shelter Service, which receives federal aid and provides support for victims of domestic abuse. He said domestic violence victims are some of the “primary victims” of Trump’s rhetoric.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Anthony Brindisi, D-N.Y.

Rep. Anthony Brindisi, D-NY, was hoping for a message of bipartisanship and unity, things that “the American people are calling for.” Trump did call on Congress to act together on many issues.

Brindisi’s top priorities this year are trying to find common ground with the Republicans on immigration reform, infrastructure and lowering prescription drug costs. On infrastructure, he said he specifically wanted to hear Trump’s ideas on investing in job training programs. Trump mentioned all the issues, but with little specificity except that he wants a border wall and enforcement to stop what he called “caravans of migrants” heading to the southern border.

“Those are things that I talked about during the campaign that many people back in upstate New York are calling for and those are things I hope he does say,” Brindisi said.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev.

Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev., said she gets excited every time she walks onto the House floor, and Tuesday was no exception. Although there were parts of the speech she did not agree with, namely Trump’s insistence on a border wall, Lee said she appreciated the call for bipartisanship.

Lowering prescription drug prices, investing in infrastructure and a comprehensive border control strategy — these are all components of his speech Lee said she could agree with.

“These are all ideas I can get behind and they work together to produce some results for American families,” she said.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Deb Halaand, D-N.M.

Rep. Deb Haaland, D-N.M., said she was dismayed about Trump’s urgency regarding funding for a border wall.

“I wasn’t surprised. Let’s put it that way about the president’s speech. I mean, of course, we don’t want a wall,” said Halland. “He instilled fear and everybody about the danger, you know, the danger that’s coming across the border.”

Haaland hopes to focus on promoting awareness about climate change and wished the President would be more receptive to the diverse issues and people around the country.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Rep. Chuy Garcia, D-Ill., said he enjoyed his first State of the Union in a historical sense, but wanted President Trump to address issues he feels are important, including raising the minimum wage and healthcare.

Rep. Jesus “Chuy” Garcia, D-Ill.

He said while the president did mention lowering prescription drug costs, there was another area of healthcare that was not noted, such as the millions who do not have healthcare at all.

“He wrapped himself around a lot of patriotism and recognition of your courageous battles and victories and but in the end, I think he failed to address important things more,” Garcia said.

 

 

Post-SOTU Interviews with Illinois Democratic Reps. Jan Schakowski and Cheri Bustos

Our Alex Lederman sat down with Illinois Democratic Reps. Jan Schakowski and Cheri Bustos after the State of the Union to hear their thoughts on President Obama’s address.

Schakowski — Evanston’s congresswoman since 1999 — said “(Obama)’s vision of what makes our country strong was so human and so true.”

Bustos said Obama is focused on the future — our children and grandchildren — and working together to solve the nation’s problems.

Medill on the Hill produces live State of the Union broadcast

WASHINGTON — It was the third day of reporting for the 21 students in Medill on the Hill. It also happened to be the day the president would deliver his final State of the Union address.

Months ago, buoyed by the excitement of the possibilities and the folly of youth, some of us came up with the idea of taking Medill on the Hill to a new level — producing live TV while also finding new ways of storytelling for the website and social media.

On State of the Union night, Jan. 12, the Washington web team led by Alex Duner and Celena Chong managed the flow of copy and constant web updates streaming in from reporters around Capitol Hill and elsewhere in D.C. There also was a constant stream of @medillonthehill tweets and snapchats as well as several Periscopes.

Tyler Kendall, Allyson Chiu and Shane McKeon were responsible for the main story, and Chiu said the experience was, “the highlight” of her journalism career.

“It was hectic, crazy and we were definitely all running on adrenaline by the end of the night,” she said.

Other reporters were assigned to stories on specific issues the president mentioned, or how local college students reacted to the speech. One even tweeted the speech in Spanish.

My task was to produce the Washington end of a live television broadcast.

Nine months ago Jesse Kirsch came back from 2015 Medill on the Hill with an idea for Carlin McCarthy, another producer with the Northwestern News Network, and me.

He said, with the optimism of a television anchor, that for the 2016 State of the Union we should produce a live broadcast with analysts at our home studio in Evanston and reporters in our D.C. bureau and on Capitol Hill. I said, with the skepticism of a television producer, that I thought he was crazy.

It took long nights, patience and a lot of support from the Medill faculty and staff, but we pulled it off.

Jesse opened the show in Evanston and before we knew it Isabella Gutierrez was doing a live hit from the Washington bureau. Then we were live in Statuary Hall with Noah Fromson, followed by a live report from graduate student Ryan Holmes on what to watch for just minutes before we streamed the live feed of President Barack Obama addressing a joint session of Congress for his final State of the Union.

We did a live interviews with Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin, wrote scripts while we counted down the seconds until they were read and gathered quotes from senators and members of Congress. Alex Lederman also provided quick-turn video interviews with two congresswomen.

Associate Producer Geordan Tilley, who interviewed Durbin, was nervous before the show, but she said she is proud of the Medill effort.

“I thought the show was some of our best work, Tilley said. “Especially considering how many firsts were involved, not the least of which was our first time going live.”

 

 

Medill Today | Wednesday, October 9, 2025